We should also notice that the White House hasn’t backtracked a single thing he has said. Obviously, this stuff is coming straight from Obama, himself.

If we also look at the fact that the CDC did not immediately send a team to TX to handle America’s 1st Ebola case, and whisk the patient off to one of the govt facilities set up to handle such cases, it becomes clear that the Obama Adminisitration is determined to ALLOW Ebola to come into the country unabated. (They have done similar things before.) The CDC has vast experience in dealing with Ebola overseas, and knows how dangerous it is, and yet they chose to leave it to amateurs in the Homeland. If those 2 nurses die, CDC Bob has blood on his hands, and couldn’t care less.

Betsy McCaughey, known for doing her homework, observed (on a news talk show) that the White House statements regarding the new Czar literally said that it was so that the CDC wouldn’t have to be “distracted from their primary mission”, which is to stomp out Ebola IN AFRICA.

I could imagine several reasons why they might be this way, but I think your observations from D’Souza’s work (especially since it quotes Obama’s book) speaks volumes. He refers to Africans as “his people”, and he seeks revenge for Western Colonialism (which also explains his treasonous Middle East policy). I have long observed that his odd behavior is explained by by 4 things, in this order of importance: (1) narcissism (2) socialism (3) anti-colonialism and (4) cronyism. So I guess I knew it all along, but didn’t realize it – it’s #3 this time.

Oddly, people take his pick for “Ebola Czar” seriously too, when it’s obviously bureaucrat-speak for “You want me to do something to stop Ebola in the US? F*** y**!” It’s a response, but the choice is an outright show of contempt for the American People. (Sorry about the bad language, but it loses something if you “translate” it!)

PS: I think of your research on Patient Zero every time they mention him as having lied to get here. To me, it’s even worse that he walked on in here without so much a violating a single rule or law. You really do your homework too.

Most of that is true, but America in that sense means the Left. Most of the evil comes from the lEft, and since the Left is part of America, that means America is tainted and responsible as well.

The solution is simple. Wipe out the evil, and the guilt will go away. Don’t wipe it out, as people refuse to fight the Left even now, and guess what happens.

“{…} I’ve never considered Obama brilliant, but he’s also not this dumb. The only conclusion one can make is that this is intentional, whether it’s anti-colonialism, the need to maintain his “all immigrants are safe and good” narrative, or because he’s a trans-nationalist who no longer perceives America as a sovereign nation — that taking in and caring for people, regardless of their origin, is a greater responsibility than caring for the “haves”/US citizens.”
= = = = = = =

I ran across a possible scenario of Obama’s mindset in a comment at Patterico:

http://patterico.com/2014/10/16/is-it-unfair-to-criticize-obama-over-ebola/

See comment #181 — it’s WAAAY long, but there are some jaw-dropping insights. From the Obama-Commie point of view America has “… been doing everything wrong” from its inception, and it’s time for our “chickens to come home to roost”. We will only appreciate how evil we’ve been after we’ve suffered the way the rest of the world does. “He thinks of America as one giant, affluent, suburban community. We’re only rich because we’ve plundered everyone else. We must be made to realize …”

So, by bringing the woes of the world to us, (the woes that according to Commie doctrine, WE have caused the rest of the world to suffer) “he’ll have to show us how we’ve been doing everything wrong our entire history by bitterly clinging to our undeserved wealth {and} our military might, …”

Once we’ve been humbled, like Winston Smith was, THEN we’ll understand. THEN, 2+2 will equal 5 (or whatever else it needs to be). We’ll be healed.

I don’t wish to sound hysterical, but the various alphabet soup international bureaucracies, including our own bureaucracies are incapable of responding due to the foolish, incompetentence of bureaucracies to operate with efficency under the umbrella of pc.

The goal of evil doesn’t require brilliance or dumbness. The goal of evil can work with either one, which in another way it means ability or IQ is irrelevant to evil.

So what results is displacement. Talking about feminists and what not, at least won’t get you fired from your job, if you are anonymous. Which is also why he doesn’t run his own blog, since he wrote before that when he did, he went off talking about his work and home location and the Leftists came for him.

Well, that’s not surprising. Who doesn’t expect the Left to come knocking if you start talking crazy heretical anti dogma? Did the Tea Party expect the IRS? Sooner or later, they would have to.

So the point is, blaming various stuff over there is easier than dealing with problems over here. That’s been the case for humans, regardless of what crutch they say they got in “disabilities”, for awhile now.

A person that cannot change himself, improve his own position, or defeat his personal enemies, cannot be expected to change the world of corruption and feminism. After all, that’s unreasonable.

Mrs Whatsit

I heard Eastern block countries routinely had various “health checks” to keep certain people out. It was a document printed with the passport, so all documentation had to be handed in. Although it was more detailed than merely the vaccination ones used normally.

We can’t get enforce any law 100% – there are still criminals who get their hands on illegal guns, tax evaders who hide income, addicts who obtain illegal drugs, drivers who exceed posted speed limits, and yet no one says we should banish those laws (OK, maybe Libertarians & the drug laws).

We can protect people from themselves by banning them from purchasing “large” sodas despite the fact that they could just as easily purchase and consume two smaller ones in one sitting, but we can’t protect people from others who would bring a deadly disease to our communities.

I’ve never considered Obama brilliant, but he’s also not this dumb. The only conclusion one can make is that this is intentional, whether it’s anti-colonialism, the need to maintain his “all immigrants are safe and good” narrative, or because he’s a trans-nationalist who no longer perceives America as a sovereign nation – that taking in and caring for people, regardless of their origin, is a greater responsibility than caring for the “haves”/US citizens.

http://www.themonitor.com/opinion/commentary-myths-about-deadly-ebola/article_ab2522c6-530d-11e4-983e-001a4bcf6878.html