Comments on: Texas voter ID law struck down; Wisconsin’s halted

By: NeoConScum

NeoConScum — Sun, 12 Oct 2014 23:37:41 +0000

How Clarence, Scalia and Alito keep from mugging the Lefty Fems on the Court is a mystery to me.

So, let’s see: In Texas and Wisconsin it’ll be fine and dandy for Latinos and Blacks to board airliners without Valid Photo ID??

By: Eric

Eric — Sun, 12 Oct 2014 14:21:34 +0000

The activist game is full spectrum.

By: n.n

n.n — Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:10:42 +0000

The opinion is right about one thing, positive identification is the first, not last, step in mitigating disenfranchisement.

By: gracepmc

gracepmc — Sat, 11 Oct 2014 16:08:16 +0000

Well, it we had a functioning press and a responsive opposition party these rulings may not be so easy to make and stand.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:49:07 +0000

The Democrats in 1860 thought the Republican abolitionists were too chicken and unmanly to fight a war. They were wrong.

These days, they actually got it right for once. Second or third time’s the charm.

By: Rachelle

Rachelle — Sat, 11 Oct 2014 05:30:20 +0000

I think it would have a salutary effect on the entire judicial system if the House impeached a few of these radical judges for failure to follow the law. Even if conviction in the Senate is a long shot on the first few, the idea will look as if it might ultimately work and might begin to scare a few straight. Letting them run wild unchallenged seems weak and not very bright. But, that is the Republican way.

By: John Dough

John Dough — Sat, 11 Oct 2014 01:29:32 +0000

I’m really glad they’re stopping the voter ID movement. I mean what would the Democrat party do with all of those cars whose trunks are loaded with ballots, just waiting to appear at recount time. (sarcasm)

By: Oldflyer

Oldflyer — Fri, 10 Oct 2014 22:48:50 +0000

How ironic is it that Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos specifically identified Hispanics and African-Americans in her ruling? It is almost as if she is ruling in favor of certain ethnic groups at the expense of all others.

So, what will happen when states simply refuse to accept the rulings of Federal Judges who tamper with state laws?

It could get very ugly; but, the outcome could be cleansing.

A person could argue–not that I am Mr Holder, if you are monitoring–that the outrages against the populace are more extreme than those which existed in 1776; and the divisions in the country are approaching the levels that prevailed in 1861.

By: blert

blert — Fri, 10 Oct 2014 22:43:54 +0000

Rufus, you can’t expect everything to be duck soup.

Buckle up.

By: blert

blert — Fri, 10 Oct 2014 22:41:07 +0000

Chicago on the Potomac strikes again.