I am reading backwards from your most recent posts, since I have been busy and negligent of reading, though I have wanted to. I know people are starting to wake up to the fact that this guy blew it big time. The blame game just makes him absolutely despicable in my book.

I think you have the right idea when you state that he grew up not believing in “accountability” and being more into this “self-esteem”. And, he was elected by a population that accepts that as well. Well not everyone, but it is wide-spread.

But the power of Presidents was still there, people just didn’t want to use it due to patriotism or other limitations.

For example, a lame duck President could write blank pardons for any number of things, and people would do them. Lame duck? Not yet.

“Obama is or might as well be a member of the muslim brotherhood, same goes for vj. Soros like a spider holds them all within a sticky web. Bho was their perfect candidate.”

%%%

I don’t know how much credence to put with this tale: But I’ve read that Barry can’t stand Soros’ company.

When they’re together George Soros is doing 98% of the talking.

Barry can’t stand that.

Further, if George is talking — then he’s talking w a a a a y over Barry’s head.

(Listen to George Soros on any topic, you’ll see what I mean.)

&&&

Against that dynamic, Soros is chronically visiting the White House — off the record.

So, I have to assume that Soros has some players in the White House that can follow instructions.

As for Barry, in many respects, he’s a perpetual loose cannon. I don’t think that he can bear to take a straight up course of action.

I think he steeples his fingers and — being smarter than anyone on the planet — come up with another ‘faculty-lounge’ solution, magical thinking at its finest.

This tick makes American (Barry’d) policy quite random. He HAS to spin away from orthodoxy — even if it’s his own faction’s.

Barry wants to assume a god-like gaze downward upon the ‘petty’ issues of governance. Can’t we just all play along?

2 sides of the same coin.

If we can’t even muster the will to counter a clearly antithetical, proseltyzing and spreading, barbaric – even evil – activist movement over there, then how can you expect us to counter indigenous social cultural/political activist movements that look like, sound like, and talk like us here?

In the activist game, you need the paradigm of good guys and bad guys and good guys contesting bad guys, and the self-certainty we are the good guys and they are the bad guys. We yield to the bad guys over there, we break the paradigm we need to win here.

Spot on. It is weak and unmanly (and unwomanly) and shows lack of leadership.

For this reason I believe we will see a wave of negative truths about this administration put forth in books and interviews unlike we’ve ever had before. It will definitely occur after 2016, but we’ll see some defectors (~whistle blowers) before then. Obama’s staff know he will readily through them under the bus at the first sign of expediency. As soon as they are free to speak openly about what really goes on behind the scenes they will return the favor. He has done nothing to instill loyalty in those he manages.

Ron Fournier ✔ @ron_fournier

I, me, my. It’s their fault. I, me, my. It’s their fault. I, me, my. It’s their fault. I, me, my. It’s their fault. I, me, my …

I don’t buy the assertion that it is ‘titanic hubris’ that has led to American interventions around the world. In fact, I’m hard pressed to think of even one that would fully qualify.

And while I agree that our first priority should be winning the fight here, I don’t accept the premise that “We are already spent”. That apparent condition is the result of decades of seditious MSM reportage and leftist democrat machinations. We haven’t yet dug deep but when sufficient motivation is applied, America will reveal unexplored depths for the societal prospect of being hanged concentrates the public’s mind as wonderfully as an individual’s. Just as Dunkirk did for the Brits.

So I’ll confess, while I’m pessimistic about our near future, in the long run, good always triumphs over evil because evil is self-defeating and unwilling to sacrifice itself for the greater good. (Jihadist martyrdom is selfish pursuit of paradise)