My webpage large excavator hire sydney [kencoles.com.au]

Many times, the children fault themselves for the breakup and carry this weight to their shoulders.
What’s more, it requires us to be a little more “creative” with many things.
It may be hard . however , the jobs are there.

50 inch led tv viewing distance
50 inch led tv coby
50 inch led tv price comparison
50 inch led tv boxing day sale

We’re getting the policy mix you’d expect from a crowd that thinks the world is run like a nursery.

Hence, the bizarre level of food aid — which is causing ALL of these problems with Muslims.

It’s not that we’re importing Muslim oil. It’s that we’re selling food too cheaply — resulting in TFRs that compel mass bloodshed.

You’ve created millions of Muslims with nothing to do, and only one place to go. The result must end up in a horrific race war — to beat all.

And all of it was triggered by the best of intentions.

You’ll get almost all of the real world results you want by just taking women out of the voting population.

The skew is THAT pronounced.

A woman — a normal woman — is biologically programmed to take care of family matters FIRST. This is so for strictly Darwinian reasons. Only a young woman has the energy to actually enjoy toddlers. Women can still have babies when they’re older, but they’re never going to enjoy them quite like they would if they were younger.

( The same twist happens to men. Young men actually enjoy boot camp, the whole band-of-brother schtick. As men get older, they can still survive boot camp. But you can’t get them to really like it. Weirdly, the older men make BY FAR the better soldiers. This has been known since ancient times.)

The obvious fact that young women make better mothers than older women has been known since ancient times. It’s why men lust so for Y O U N G women — walking past entirely suitable gals ten years older.

All of this is wired into the human DNA. It’s beyond debate.

&&&

Because of this universal shift, young women voters have a hugely skewed voting preference — for family benefits — and essentially ZERO interest in foreign affairs. The college crowd interviews neo has posted are absolutely perfect evidence of this skew.

Even young men have a sharply reduced interest in foreign affairs.

&&&

By the time a woman is mature, really mature, her interests expand to just about everything. The kids no longer dominate her moment to moment thoughts.

For both sexes, enough history has passed to begin informing them that their professors and high school teachers lived in a dream world. (They always do.)

Teachers / professors never establish businesses, hiring and firing, and dealing with bonafide dummies — as in having to get actual production out of them — as against just handing out a failing grade and walking on.

They also don’t ever deal with business death, business turn-arounds, and witness when the rubber meets the road.

Consequently, the professors/ teachers skew insanely to the Left — and to the notion of perfecting humanity — hopefully in one generation — right now!

No-one can make good judgments until this fantasy is cast aside.

All of the above is why adults keep drifting to the Right — and toward limited government.

Raw experience informs adults that TV cops are not at all like real cops, that real court cases are not at all like TV court… etc. This takes a while.

Whereas, Hollywood, Big Media, — they all STAY in the professorial bubble. They’ve got an even bigger pulpit — and absolutely no connection to reality.

Soetoro and Holder are acmes of this career track.

Because of the children, young women skew the entire woman’s vote to the Hard Left.

This is something that can’t be changed. It’s innate.

If women were to be restricted to voting until they were 42, the skew would largely vanish.

And, due to modern shifts, the men should be restricted to voting only after they’ve reached 32.

This would replicate the economic dynamic of the early republic. By the time any man was 21 he was economically established. He was not (generally) under the sway of some clique of professors with perfect plans to implement.

As we all know, Barry is ENTIRELY sustained by the ignorance of the young adults. The great mass of seasoned adults realize that Barry’s world is insane.

“The Left won that war. They won. We lost.” Mike

“i would not mind a return to the original way it was in terms of who could and couldnt vote, as it prevented people from voting benefits from the public till as only those who were putting into the public till could vote (this would also include a removal of income tax as it was)” Artfldgr

That’s a formula for an oligarchy and the ‘have nots’ becoming serfs.

But I do agree that only military veterans having the franchise is a flawed proposal. What’s an alternative that isn’t flawed? I see no substitute for an informed citizenry conversant with logic, reason and common sense.

“Political ideas that have dominated the public mind for decades cannot be refuted through rational arguments. They must run their course in life and cannot collapse otherwise than in great catastrophe…” Ludwig von Mises

America has been creating the conditions that will almost certainly result in catastrophe. The only question is which catastrophe will manifest first.

The Army reports that only 10 percent of its active-duty officers are black, which has contributed to its dearth of black officers leading soldiers with occupational specialties in infantry, armor and artillery.

the first thing is that the military has been selecting politically correct soldiers and outing the ones who are not part of that idea…

so, what you would get is more of what you ahve now, and even FASTER change based on that.

“I wonder if the Naval War College tossed out teaching Halsey, Farragut or other great naval war fighters because they were not politically correct?” wrote retired Senior Chief Electrician’s Mate (SW/AW) Charles March

you might want to look at the rules for things like CPO365 (Which is navy), and similar..

and then there is this…
Transgender is now allowed BUT only if they have not yet had surgery on their genitals and other things (The medical component). Basically they are free to serve as long as they dont show or display, and then after service can proceed on to their changes.

care to read about other changes that have been made?

Military personnel must not actively advocate supremacist doctrine, ideology, or causes, including those that advance, encourage, or advocate illegal discrimination based on race, creed, color, sex, religion, ethnicity, or national origin or that advance,encourage, or advocate the use of force, violence, or criminal activity or otherwise advance efforts to deprive individuals of their civil rights

however, the above is about active advocacy…
not what you believe without being active.

so you can have tattoos now, but cant collect money for your favorite anti government social group… in fact, you may be very surprised as to the changes that have been going on since the late 80s as the pool of acceptable recruits had been reduced by politics, and all kinds of things

see
Executive Order 10450–Security requirements for Government employment
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/10450.html

and what about things like civilian officers who have military rank, like the medical community? which of course is rife with certain kinds of thinkers..

funny funny, but i will bet you that the people who get to decide what the qualities that are best would be ACADEMICS… and so, they would not only select the qualities, but would also be the ones writing that damn program…

nope, wont work…

there is the point that people rise up to the expectations put upon them, and so, some people who would be presumed to be awful presidents may be great, and visa versa.

i can see several ways to game the system you propose, and even easier than the current one.

Despite my son being a naval officer in the pacific, I do NOT agree with your argument…

Especially given history…

It would make a country driven by military perspectives

though i would not mind a return to the original way it was in terms of who could and couldnt vote, as it prevented people from voting benefits from the public till as only those who were putting into the public till could vote (this would also include a removal of income tax as it was)