Comments on: “Honey, I love you so much…

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Sat, 06 Sep 2014 04:02:51 +0000

Don Carlos:

Yes, it is my opinion that the commenters serving as the prosecution have failed to present any evidence whatsoever to support their case. If it were a court and were the defense, I’d move for a directed verdict of not guilty. And if I were the judge, I’d grant it.

By: Don Carlos

Don Carlos — Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:09:27 +0000

Like I said, the audio and video data are the evidence. The commenters here serve either on the prosecution or defense sides in interpreting the evidence before an off-stage jury. Are you the judge, favoring a directed verdict, Neo?

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Fri, 05 Sep 2014 19:29:52 +0000

People feel guilt about all the years of the 21st century that they sat around not realizing the evil around them. But inquisition level passion doesn’t really atone for much of anything, on the internet.

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:49:02 +0000

Don Carlos:

And we’re having the debate. So what’s your beef?

I say it should be a directed verdict, because the prosecution has presented no evidence. And I’m merely pointing out why it wasn’t necessary for me to have known all children, or for parker to have known all children, for me to come to the conclusion that he didn’t know enough children to know that there are plenty of kids like the child in the video.

By: Don Carlos

Don Carlos — Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:37:24 +0000

Golly, Gee, what I said: “A debate about the audio & video evidence presented, rather than a PC “consensus”, is what this is all about.”
Prosecution vs. Defense. Seems like a hung jury. And minds are difficult things to change, no?

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:11:19 +0000

Don Carlos:

Of course I don’t know all kids. I just need to know kids who are an exception to parker’s generalization to say he’s wrong in his generalization. My saying he doesn’t know all kids means he doesn’t know the exceptions to his generalization, which exist. I know they exist because I know some.

In that argument, race doesn’t even enter into it. And there’s no similarity to leftist reasoning. It is merely logic.

I have no idea about the facts behind this video. But I see no reason whatsoever to doubt it’s for real. I know quite a few kids like that, and this kid seems to me to be speaking spontaneously, for himself.

By: Don Carlos

Don Carlos — Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:41:43 +0000

A debate about the audio & video evidence presented, rather than a PC “consensus”, is what this is all about. That Neo doesn’t like it (“parker-you don’t know all kids”) is troubling. No one knows ALL kids, not even Neo. I see a resemblance to leftist reasoning here. Those of us who do not like modern black culture and are somewhat suspicious of it are, well, dubious of the motives and truth behind the vid; we have been lied to too much.
The black frame around the video that I clicked on had vulgar obscene language on it. No one has said anything about that…is the fault in my computer? I think not. More PC pretending that ugliness is not seen.

By: Beverly

Beverly — Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:31:57 +0000

My impression is that they’re part of a married, comfortably middle class family. Mom says “we” aren’t going to get rid of you, etc. Note also her educated tones, and the nice, size-appropiate car seats.

/Sherlock off

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:57:28 +0000

parker:

You don’t know all kids.

As I said, I know quite a few kids who at that age (and even younger) were fully capable of that sort of conversation all on their own.

By: parker

parker — Thu, 04 Sep 2014 23:39:51 +0000

I know kids, until this year I worked as a volunteer in an elementary school for 10 years, we raised 3 kids, and we have 5 and soon to be 6 grandchildren. Either this 7 year old is the next Tesla or this was staged.