You are making an error that is common, which is calling those Jews who were Communists and Stalin apologists “Jews.”

Yes, they were and are Jews in the sense Hitler defined Jews (i.e. of Jewish ancestry). Some of them define themselves as Jews culturally or ethnically; some not. But I think you’d have to look long and hard to find any observant Jew who apologizes for Stalin. The Jews I knew and know who were and are pro-Communist defined themselves as atheists. Their replacement religion was Communism.

So, it’s the use of the term “Jews” that causes the confusion. Granted, it’s a difficult term to define.

Nazi and Soviet influences.

Haj Amin al-Husseni, reportedly was housed next door to the Wannsee conference building. (Pam Gellar)

It’s also alleged that he issued a fatwa in favor of the Holocaust; which I figure must be true.

####

And I grant you that the Muslim Brotherhood were re-launched out of failure by Nazi monies — long before WWII erupted.

And, it’s true that the MB was massively involved in Northwest Africa (French North Africa) working actively against the Western Allies from Torch onward.

###

But, it’s a major error to keep conflating post-war politics with the Nazis. The best fit is the Communists.

The KGB’s fingerprints are all over every single faction of radical Islam — going back at least as far as the High Aswan Dam and Nasser’s revolution.

Curiously, Nasser started out with the MB ‘on board’ — and then ejecting them. The split did not take very long.

As long as Moscow and Cairo were tight, the MB was on the outs.

The second Cairo switched over to Washington, Moscow become enthused with the MB, and every other shade of radical.

With all the cut-outs used by the KGB, one would need a playbill to keep up.

Certainly the PLO was a KGB construct.

Islamic fanatics breed new fronts like Hydra regenerates snake heads.

But, on the whole, they rather consistently get their weapons and funding from the Second World. Even their terror tactics are crafted by Moscow.

While I can certainly understand Jewish loathing for Hitler and Nazism; I must point out that the CURRENT threat emanates from MOSCOW, and has been ever since 1948.

&&&

In my personal life, I’ve encountered no end of American Jewry that give Communists a ‘pass’ because they fought the Nazis.

That’s SOME revisionism.

Stalin, not Hitler, started WWII in Europe.

How’s that, you say?

While Hitler was looking for conquest all along…

He was actually trapped in a strategic box by Paris, London and Warsaw. Now entirely overlooked by history, Nazi Germany faced a resource crisis of the first magnitude: ALL of its rubber had to be imported via either the French or British trading blocs. Paris and London kept Adolf on a short leash.

Likewise, Hitler was building a massive air force — with no aviation fuel to power it. (!!!!)

Stalin eliminated all of Hitler’s bottlenecks at a stroke, AND he selected the START DATE OF THE ATTACK. (9-1-1939) This is now known to be in writing, drafted in Moscow.

Stalin’s original deal was to attack on the 1st. He cleverly dodged his massive guilt by delaying his attack until Warsaw was wrapped up by Nazi armies.

This stunt was later to cost the Red Army dearly. It was the primary rationale advanced by Adolf to his generals that brought them around to full support of Barbarossa. [Any army that couldn’t organize a walk over surely couldn’t respond in a timely manner in front of Moscow….]

And then there’s the horrific nature of Stalin’s anti-Semitism. Nikita declared Stalin to be an anti-Semite of the first water. He TOTALLY PURGED his (Jewish) Diplomatic staff — at a stroke. This was the beginning of Molotov’s reign. [ No, they didn’t all go off to a happy retirement. ]

And then there’s the Doctor’s Plot. Stalin intended to pick up where Adolf had left off — and liquidate any remaining Jews in Russia. So, Beria killed him with Warfarin. (Rat poison) It’s the kind of poison that you can ingest, side by side with Stalin, — and then go out and take the antidote before anything untoward were to happen.

And then there’s Stalin’s complicity in the Holocaust. There are enough tea leaves to believe that Stalin’s the reason why the repression of European Jewry lurched into lethal gear — only after Barbarossa. Some co-incidence.

Yet, after all of these indications, American Jews tend to give Stalinists a ‘pass.’

I can’t.

I maintain that Communists — now Putinists — are a global threat to peace — and that Russians STILL have a hard-on for victimizing Jewry. That will never change. I think it’s in their DNA.

Even now I spot obvious anti-Semitic trolling that stinks like Moscow. The Hydra keeps regrowing heads.

Without Moscow, Islamism would collapse due to economics. The Ummah can’t produce the weapons it needs to be a player. Never forget that.

Yet, virtually all of my Jewish (brainiac) friends DO forget that.

Can you explain it?

While the Arab Muslims did not go so far as to think that Hitler supplanted Allah, they certainly did admire Hitler and Nazis tremendously in terms of their attitude towards the Jews, as Paul in Boston has written.

I wrote a post on the topic in 2010, here.

The Nazis, looking for partners in the Arab world, funded and trained the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1930’s helping them increase their membership from a few hundred to two hundred thousand in Egypt. Many, many Egyptians fought on the side of the Nazis and against the British in Africa. Two of the most famous were Nassar and Sadat.

One of the most important Brothers was Haj Amin Al-Husseni, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, leader of the Arabs in Palestine. He escaped to Berlin about 1940 and was an honored guest of Hitler in Berlin for the entire war. He repaid the hospitality by making a daily broadcast to the Muslim world extolling the virtues of Nazism. He also organized an SS brigade of Bosnian Muslims who marched around the Balkans killing Serbs, Croats, and Jews. After the war, The British wanted to try him as a war criminal but the French let him go and he escaped to Egypt.

After WWII thousands of Nazis escaped to Egypt, including many SS and Gestapo officers, and helped the Brotherhood. Some even converted to Islam.

To this day Mein Kampf, along with the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, is a very popular book in the Arab world.

But, but, but…

Islamism IS a fusion of Islam and Communism.

As in 30::70.

It’s MORE Communism than it is Islam.

Mo’s dicta have no economic relevance for today.

There aren’t enough camel caravans to go around — or anything like them.

This fusion is EXTREMELY evident within the agitprop of the opfor. It just gets suppressed in OUR MSM.

Our MSM doesn’t consider the Communist aspect of Islamism to be worthy of comment. Like a fish, the MSM does not recognize the sea of Communism that it swims in. Further, the MSM does not consider such matters as even being controversial… more towards: “the sky is blue, the Sun comes up in the east…”

In sum: not news, and certainly not news fit to print.

&&&

More generally, collectivism is RETROGRADE, a return to our tribal norms, of GROUP ACTION, of “you didn’t build this…”

Most of humanity STILL lives by this rule set.

%%%

One people, one nation, one leader… it’s not just for Nazism.

It’s embedded in Stalinism, and many another ‘ism.

###

I must take exception with Islamofascism. It’s logically incorrect.

Islamists are either Communist knock-offs… or a differing flavor of Shintoism.

Islamism is simply an Arab version of Shintoism.

The two track each other / parallel each other FAR, FAR, more than any linkage to Nazism — or Italian Fascism.

Islamists don’t even believe in the corporatist state.

Like the Shintoists, they see a fusion of religion with economics with triumphalist superiority — with epic domination.

While Hitler certainly admired Islamic fanaticism, Muslims did NOT return the favor. No living despot could supplant Allah.

I tend to agree.

Some members of the totalitarian-collectivist class will probably ally for convenience with Islam, but others will probably “discover” in Islam certain core values which they themselves embrace: universalism, the abolition of superstructural law (however perceived or defined), the end of: usury, individualism, private conscience, and civil society. They will find what they want in the form of “deep structural affinities” or whatever. They will worry about patriarchy later.

Hell, there was Freudian Marxism, why not Islamo-Progressivism? Or Islam inspired “progressivism”?

The original population of Gaza was 95% military age males! It was dinky.

Without a doubt, the Israelis expected that the Egyptian army would accept their men back.

The fact that these boys humiliated themselves — and Cairo — was over looked in the calculus.

The women were imported AFTER the Egyptian ‘campaign’ devolved into a sitzkrieg. (1949-1967)

[In 1948, the Israelis were a tad short in the tank department. This is why the Gazan position was not promptly driven into the sea.]

Likewise, the greater bulk of the 1948 Green Line was reached as Israelis finally met even token Arab resistance — particularly the southern wing of Judea.

The Israeli stab towards the Red Sea was inspired. It was not pre-figured at the beginning of the campaign. This is something that amazes. Keeping Egypt and Jordan separate has proven to be a war winner, time and time again.

Now with a population of 1.8 million and a whoppingly high birth rate of 2.9%, where is Gaza to go?