Comments on: Obama and the border: what side is he on?

By: Edith

Edith — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 04:52:26 +0000

[NeoNeoCon: Check this out – saw it today on the web!]

Revealed: The Destroyer of Obama’s Tyranny

(One of the following will stop the runaway train called “Obama” and will be famous forever! Check everyone listed and guess who will achieve this:)

A Republican; a Democrat; an Independent; a Chinese dissident; a Muslim jihadist; a talk show host; a teenager on meds; a movie star; a White House policeman; a Black rap artist; Michelle Obama; a Jewish columnist; a 90-year-old jogger; a death row inmate; YOU; a member of a Russian garden club; a Wall Street insider; a perennial lottery loser; a Secret Service agent; a recently discovered superbug; a vengeful pig farmer; a 105-year-old Tea Party member; a mad Army general; a gay alien from the Exonica Galaxy; the world’s first transgendered dog, or one of Obama’s live-in relatives.

(The correct answer, buried above, is three letters long and in caps. For more on the same tyrant, Google “The Background Obama Can’t Cover Up” and also “Coming to a theater near you: WHITE HOUSE-GROWN TERRORISTS starring Obaba Black Sheep…”)

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:54:50 +0000

My point was: why isn’t the right more hard-hitting?

They lack the will. They don’t truly believe in something worth killing or dying for, so they refuse to believe the LEft is serious. Just as the Left often refuses to believe Islamic JIhad is serious, until they have hired enough bodyguards, of course.

By: Bob From Virginia

Bob From Virginia — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:02:00 +0000

There were plenty of people who saw correctly what Obama was although I recall only one, a Brit, who stated clearly the guy was a fellow traveler. The dreaded “IT” did happen here, hopefully with fewer repercussions than in 1933. Lesson: A frivolous people cannot be expected to make wise decisions, so let’s hope in the next two years Obama’s knavery hurts his electoral entourage to the point their pain teaches them the error of their ways. Until then, they are a bunch of stupid squalid SOBs who deserve to be drawn and quartered.

By: Cornhead

Cornhead — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 03:02:18 +0000

Here in Omaha we had one illegal alien kill 3 or 4 people last summer. He had no business being in this country. And another case involving the brutal rape of an 80 something woman in her own home.

What will be the death and injury total from this latest fully preventable invasion?

Someone needs to start a websites like Religion of Peace to tally these crimes. But the media rarely reports immigration status. It should.

By: J.J.

J.J. — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 02:30:15 +0000

Here’s a 15 minute video of a retired Border Patrol agent talking about what he believes is going on. In his opinion the children are a diversion to allow something more ominous.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnkSXosZhic&feature=player_embedded

Where is the money coming from to get these people from Central America across Mexico to the border? 60,000 illegals X $13,000 in coyote payments equals $780 million. Those poverty stricken people in Central America don’t have that kind of money. Who is financing this? The answer to that question would tell us a lot about what’s going on. Is it U.S money, oil sheik money, Russian mafia money, George Soros money, or ?

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 02:02:59 +0000

Orson:

Rogers is not on the left. He is on the right.

That’s why I asked the question. My point was: why isn’t the right more hard-hitting? He worked in the Reagan White House, in addition to other things.

By: Orson

Orson — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 02:00:04 +0000

“Why is Ed Rogers so mild and tentative here?” I suppose it’s a worthy question. But I gave up reading after five sentences or so.

I’m pretty uninterested in the Left’s perception of reality – only to have my prejudices confirmed in spades.

It is pretty dull exercise. Do you really find it rewarding? Who else does? – and why?

By: M J R

M J R — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:56:07 +0000

eve, 5:02 pm — ” . . . yes, Americans have always welcomed immigrants—LEGAL immigrants.”

LEGAL immigrants who

-1- were demonstrably free from infectious disease, and
-2- showed evidence that they would be self-supporting.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 22:58:54 +0000

If they believed the Left’s propaganda on any of the historical topics, including slavery or Iraq under Bush II, then they are too weak to speak truth to power. So it was in the past, and so it is now with Hussein. Nothing has changed.

By: eve

eve — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:02:51 +0000

A few days ago my (democrat) sister posted a link on Facebook to a clip where Jon Stewart (late night) was lambasting conservatives because “Americans have always welcomed immigrants.” I replied that yes, Americans have always welcomed immigrants–LEGAL immigrants. Jon conveniently failed to differentiate.