<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hillary Clinton does not believe in free speech	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-789462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-789462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The early message seems to be she&#039;ll stay the course from Obama, but she&#039;ll consolidate and smooth out the rough edges.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The early message seems to be she&#8217;ll stay the course from Obama, but she&#8217;ll consolidate and smooth out the rough edges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Don Carlos		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-789160</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Carlos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-789160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Neo-
The common thread seems to be cronyism, with the dues-paying schlubs funding but being disregarded by their &quot;Leadership&quot;, kinda like AARP.. What&#039;s in it for the average travel agent or realtor? What, indeed, is in it for Clinical Pathologists (the blood test crowd) except possibly that LabCorp and the like employ a lot and are large, publicly-traded corporations, so cronyism again, currying favor with Medicare and HHS, a usually poor investment. We sure know what&#039;s in it for Kohlberg KravisRoberts(KKR): soft eyes at the SEC. 

Some is just money-laundering, like $ from Susan Axelrod&#039;s group.

Some of it is plain Leftist stupidity, like the 300,000 Pounds from British Jews; what&#039;s the Hill gonna do for them, HaHa?

The puzzler is the Economics Club of Grand Rapids (which i take it is in MI, not MN), but maybe Islams have moved in with turbans and shit since the days of Gerry Ford. Not according to Wiki, which says census data show several offshoots of the Dutch Reformed Church (I suspect liberal) and the United methodist Church (definitely liberal), as well as Catholics(+/_ liberal, depends on the clergy), and still ~65% white.
It turns out the Econ Club of Grand Rapids will take anyone as a member at $150/ or so per yr. Speaker for 2014 is the British Virgin, Richard Branson. Like Groucho Marx, I wouldn&#039;t join, Saints be preserved, even if I had to live there. even if I had to live there I say again. I will not belong to a club that will have me as a member.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neo-<br />
The common thread seems to be cronyism, with the dues-paying schlubs funding but being disregarded by their &#8220;Leadership&#8221;, kinda like AARP.. What&#8217;s in it for the average travel agent or realtor? What, indeed, is in it for Clinical Pathologists (the blood test crowd) except possibly that LabCorp and the like employ a lot and are large, publicly-traded corporations, so cronyism again, currying favor with Medicare and HHS, a usually poor investment. We sure know what&#8217;s in it for Kohlberg KravisRoberts(KKR): soft eyes at the SEC. </p>
<p>Some is just money-laundering, like $ from Susan Axelrod&#8217;s group.</p>
<p>Some of it is plain Leftist stupidity, like the 300,000 Pounds from British Jews; what&#8217;s the Hill gonna do for them, HaHa?</p>
<p>The puzzler is the Economics Club of Grand Rapids (which i take it is in MI, not MN), but maybe Islams have moved in with turbans and shit since the days of Gerry Ford. Not according to Wiki, which says census data show several offshoots of the Dutch Reformed Church (I suspect liberal) and the United methodist Church (definitely liberal), as well as Catholics(+/_ liberal, depends on the clergy), and still ~65% white.<br />
It turns out the Econ Club of Grand Rapids will take anyone as a member at $150/ or so per yr. Speaker for 2014 is the British Virgin, Richard Branson. Like Groucho Marx, I wouldn&#8217;t join, Saints be preserved, even if I had to live there. even if I had to live there I say again. I will not belong to a club that will have me as a member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ackler		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-789132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ackler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-789132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This clip is a wonderful example of the Clintons&#039; overall attitude: flippant, glib, utterly disdainful. And there is justification for such an attitude. Unless there is a dramatic and unimaginable change in the political landscape, Hillary is virtually guaranteed the Democratic nomination in 2016. Democrats desperately want to hold on to power; a loss of the Senate this year will only intensify this already markedly acute desire. Hillary is their safest, most likely path to that end. Period. QED. No one even dares mounting a serious challenge to her (to those of you who think Elizabeth Warren is doing anything but positioning herself for VP and/or for the 2020 or 2024 nomination, please think again). 

Moreover, the MSM desperately wants the Democrats to hold onto power in 2016. They understand Hillary is extremely likely to be the nominee and are highly reticent to do anything that might, even slightly, undercut her chances in the general election. 

The Clintons know these truths, all too well. They know they are, for all intents and purposes, above all scrutiny, above all &quot;mainstream&quot; criticism. This interview reflects as such. Hillary was conveying a simple message, long ago echoed by Boss Tweed: What are YOU going to do about it? Diane Sawyer? MSM? Democratic Party? The answer is nothing. We all know that. 

Bone chilling in a way, but it&#039;s where we are at.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This clip is a wonderful example of the Clintons&#8217; overall attitude: flippant, glib, utterly disdainful. And there is justification for such an attitude. Unless there is a dramatic and unimaginable change in the political landscape, Hillary is virtually guaranteed the Democratic nomination in 2016. Democrats desperately want to hold on to power; a loss of the Senate this year will only intensify this already markedly acute desire. Hillary is their safest, most likely path to that end. Period. QED. No one even dares mounting a serious challenge to her (to those of you who think Elizabeth Warren is doing anything but positioning herself for VP and/or for the 2020 or 2024 nomination, please think again). </p>
<p>Moreover, the MSM desperately wants the Democrats to hold onto power in 2016. They understand Hillary is extremely likely to be the nominee and are highly reticent to do anything that might, even slightly, undercut her chances in the general election. </p>
<p>The Clintons know these truths, all too well. They know they are, for all intents and purposes, above all scrutiny, above all &#8220;mainstream&#8221; criticism. This interview reflects as such. Hillary was conveying a simple message, long ago echoed by Boss Tweed: What are YOU going to do about it? Diane Sawyer? MSM? Democratic Party? The answer is nothing. We all know that. </p>
<p>Bone chilling in a way, but it&#8217;s where we are at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cornhead		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-789099</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornhead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-789099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s our theme: electing Hillary would be Obama&#039;s third term.

Pass it on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s our theme: electing Hillary would be Obama&#8217;s third term.</p>
<p>Pass it on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: blert		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-789074</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-789074</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Any day that Hillary needs more cash she can always replicate her staggering success in the cattle futures pits.

The gal never has a losing trade!

And commodities futures are tax advantaged, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any day that Hillary needs more cash she can always replicate her staggering success in the cattle futures pits.</p>
<p>The gal never has a losing trade!</p>
<p>And commodities futures are tax advantaged, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Molly NH		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-789065</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molly NH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-789065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Time to get the Hilary lying machine *cranking*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to get the Hilary lying machine *cranking*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-789045</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-789045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It really isn&#039;t surprising that she can keep a straight face playing the &quot;woe is me card&quot; and the MSM goes along.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really isn&#8217;t surprising that she can keep a straight face playing the &#8220;woe is me card&#8221; and the MSM goes along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: stu		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-788976</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-788976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So that explains why the White House got ransacked just before they departed DC the first time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that explains why the White House got ransacked just before they departed DC the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-788972</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-788972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don Carlos:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-presidency_of_Bill_Clinton#Public_speaking_and_campaigning&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wiki says&lt;/a&gt; corporations and philanthropic groups.

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-123486/BBC-pays-Bill-Clinton-50-000-speech.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BBC paid him&lt;/a&gt; 50,000 pounds for a speech.  More:

&lt;blockquote&gt; The day prior to the Dimbleby lecture, the London School of Economics was charged a much discounted £18,500 for a speech by the former President.

Mr Clinton has been more successful than any past President in turning his fame into lucrative commercial enterprises, earning fees as high as £300,000 for a three-day engagement in Tokyo for a food and cosmetics importer. During other trips to Britain, he charged £150,000 to the Yorkshire International Business Convention in Leeds and £300,000 for three speeches to the Jewish National Fund in England and Scotland.

In addition, a Sunday newspaper gave him £100,000 to appear at a festival and Independent News and Media was charged £100,000 for a speech.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/07/hillary-clinton-is-a-very-well-paid-speaker.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; another article about the Clintons (and others) and how much they earn from speeches.  Excerpt:
&lt;blockquote&gt;In the six months since she gave up her job as secretary of State, Clinton has delivered or scheduled at least fourteen paid talks, with audiences ranging from the American Society of Travel Agents, the Economic Club of Grand Rapids, an Atlantic Council gala (where she was introduced by Henry Kissinger), the American Society for Clinical Pathology, Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy (a nonprofit founded by David Axelrod&#039;s wife, Susan), and an investor meeting of private equity firm KKR. (She has also done a number of unpaid appearances, which tend to be related to her Clinton Foundation advocacy work for women and girls.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don Carlos:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-presidency_of_Bill_Clinton#Public_speaking_and_campaigning" rel="nofollow">Wiki says</a> corporations and philanthropic groups.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-123486/BBC-pays-Bill-Clinton-50-000-speech.html" rel="nofollow">BBC paid him</a> 50,000 pounds for a speech.  More:</p>
<blockquote><p> The day prior to the Dimbleby lecture, the London School of Economics was charged a much discounted £18,500 for a speech by the former President.</p>
<p>Mr Clinton has been more successful than any past President in turning his fame into lucrative commercial enterprises, earning fees as high as £300,000 for a three-day engagement in Tokyo for a food and cosmetics importer. During other trips to Britain, he charged £150,000 to the Yorkshire International Business Convention in Leeds and £300,000 for three speeches to the Jewish National Fund in England and Scotland.</p>
<p>In addition, a Sunday newspaper gave him £100,000 to appear at a festival and Independent News and Media was charged £100,000 for a speech.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/07/hillary-clinton-is-a-very-well-paid-speaker.html" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s</a> another article about the Clintons (and others) and how much they earn from speeches.  Excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the six months since she gave up her job as secretary of State, Clinton has delivered or scheduled at least fourteen paid talks, with audiences ranging from the American Society of Travel Agents, the Economic Club of Grand Rapids, an Atlantic Council gala (where she was introduced by Henry Kissinger), the American Society for Clinical Pathology, Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy (a nonprofit founded by David Axelrod&#8217;s wife, Susan), and an investor meeting of private equity firm KKR. (She has also done a number of unpaid appearances, which tend to be related to her Clinton Foundation advocacy work for women and girls.)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Don Carlos		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-does-not-believe-in-free-speech/#comment-788971</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Carlos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=39564#comment-788971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AMartel-
How the H can she disappoint? You have good expectations of her? Why? About what? Do you live in a cave?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMartel-<br />
How the H can she disappoint? You have good expectations of her? Why? About what? Do you live in a cave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
