That’s what you need to pin on them, and then you need to take that original sin and guilt, and stick it to your Democrat friends. Only when they feel the hate they ought to have felt, will they begin breaking the abused wife syndrome.

Otherwise, they come back in a few days, their wounds regenerated, and says “Hussein still loves me, he’s still better than other men”. “You just got to give him more time, he’s trying”.

Meanwhile, as the LA is doing this overseas, their demon spawns from Democrat neighborhoods, families, and environments, are busy killing American kids. Right now.

Also people think Hussein is smart, and that Biden is dumb. With the equivalent assumption that dumb a people will do more damage.

That, in itself, is the height of stupidity.

I would much much rather Biden than Obama. And that’s saying something, because I think Biden would also be a disaster. But not quite as big a disaster as Obama. Not as malevolent, basically.

Who are corralled, bred, trained, and put to work by the Left and their activists.

Is that still the case?

To what degree of harm to nation and people does Obama have to reach before Biden can emerge as a better option than Obama?

As much as they’re symbiotic and Democrats have sold themselves to the Left activist social movement, there is still a ghost of separation. Inasmuch there remains a separation, Biden is a mainline Democrat more than a leftist.

The difference may only be a wisp at this point, but comparatively at this point of Obama’s presidency, I wouldn’t be so quick to proclaim that Biden is automatically a worse choice for America than Obama.

This is a major factor in why social politics is an activist game that operates on the principles of military maneuver, not HS debate club – politics as war by other means.

In an activist setting, even something that seems self-evident like the harmful, norms-breaking nature of the Bergdahl exchange, or need to resolve the festering Saddam problem, can be rationalized in the narrative contest.

In the activist game, the reasoned truth is just one more competing narrative. Or, said another way, competing narratives are elective truth.

It’s not enough to prove your case, no matter how obvious it seems. You need to win your case, and that requires a lot more than a fact pattern.

Nothing. You could have incontrovertible video evidence of Obama robbing charities so as to guild the frame on a real Kenyan birth certificate and the Democrats would still circle the wagons and not vote to convict.

Back when Clinton was president, Sen. Moynihan was on (maybe) David Brinkley’s show and was asked point blank if lying about sex -under oath- with an intern was an impeachable offense. He didn’t even pause and said “Yes”. When it was pointed out that Clinton had just admitted to the affair, Moynihan looked like he had just eaten a rotten lemon and he muttered something unintelligible. Not long after, he was among the unanimous Democrat votes in the Senate to not convict. The party uber alles mentality has only gotten worse since then. There is no crime that Obama could commit that would force the Senate Democrats to commit an even graver offense: willingly giving the opposition a victory.

This country is facing a schism as it did in the 1850s.

Bergdahl is great because he solidifies the young soldiers (e.g. the non-applauding West Pointers) against the regime, those same young soldiers who the LIVs thank for their service, unlike the 1970s. We need events to provoke a coup. Martial law in the right hands.