http://patterico.com/2013/12/20/duck-dynasty-patriarch-suspended-pursuant-to-morals-clause/

I mean, why would such people give up their individuality for slavery and obedience to the Authority of the left, if there were no homophobes? If there were no people who hated them?

Just as the case is with the Palestinians, they need external enemies or else the Left’s power fades away on the morning breeze.

If gays and lesbians do no suffer, the Left cannot control them. Thus, they will be made to suffer or else.

And, perhaps in this media storm someone somewhere will read what Mr. Robertson said and perhaps pause to reflect on their own life. At the possibility of that happening I can imagine Mr. Robertson will believe his mission accomplished and he would be Happy, Happy, Happy.

They are producing homosexual and homoerotic material for pre teens to digest and condition themselves to like. This is known as pre-conditioning to NAMBLA, to get children to be trained for sex or to justify having sex with children.

Yet people are still under the leftist indoctrination that we care more about controlling people’s sex lives?

They need to re do the Propaganda 101 class, again.

Planned Parenthood is a for profit organization based upon the consequences of sex and nullifying it.

Leftist psychologists have successfully implanted memories of false rape and child abuse in their subjects by merely talking to them via hypnotic methods. Most of these techniques have been weaponized and are now used by school counselors and administrators in college to foment “sexual equality”.

So between the choice of religious people preaching to me that sex outside marriage is bad, and being brain Fed by the Left into remembering sexual torture that never existed so I can hate the patriarchy… which one do you think I would choose?

What I am concerned with is who, left or right, lusts to use the power of DC to restrict my speech or sexual choices. And, I am ultimately concerned about who wants to point a gun at me and mine to pick our pockets.

The left is overly concerned with my thoughts and speech; the right is overly concerned with my sex life.

It seems to me that neither side truly understands “just leave me the f&ck alone.”

The Left is certainly showing their true colors here. Anybody who expresses an opinion contrary to the Official Truth must be destroyed.

These people are not Americans in any way, shape, or form. They are the enemy. They are TWANLOC: Those Who Are No Longer Our Countrymen, as Subotai Bahadur says.

There is no way for free people to share a country with totalitarian Leftists. There is nothing to compromise about. Either we are free to speak our minds and live our lives as we see fit (for example, the Christian baker) or we submit completely to the Leftist agenda. They certainly make no bones about it. They demand nothing short of unconditional surrender.

I do not see any way past this impasse that does not involve extreme violence and bloodshed. Either ours or theirs, and probably both.

I would also add that homosexuality and other forms of deviant behavior can be tolerated in a comfortable and affluent society. But once the economy collapses and millions of people are hungry, cold, frightened, and desperate, it will not be.

I’m torn: I really don’t bother going out of my way merely to offend, but at the same time, I confess to loving the clinical accuracy of the description, and the sneaking suspicion that many/most gays prefer to omit the clinically accurate description. Why? (Or am I mistaken?)

It reminds me of the euphemism “pro-choice”. Someone who is “pro-choice” is “pro” choosing to do what, exactly? To choose to have an abortion performed. Okay, and what does an actual abortion actually entail? Let’s get graphic. Let’s delve into possibly squeamish detail. Why the euphemism? Is “pro-choice” *just* an abbreviation, or is it an attempt to mask, to defuse, to paper over, what’s actually taking place?

What does an abortion actually entail? Let’s get clinically accurate, whether it entails crushing the little baby’s head in the mommy’s body — errrmm, crushing the little fetus’ head in the female’s body, or whether it involves administering some sort of saline poison (?*) to ashphyxiate the little baby — errrmm, to terminate the unwanted fetus. And so on.

It’s calling a spade a spade. Is calling clinically accurate spades such as these, spades, somehow offensive or at least uncomfortable for the gaystapo or the abortion mill sympathizers? If not, why the euphemisms?

——

* (I’m really not up on this sort of stuff; I’m imitating what I think I recall reading. Do feel free to correct me here (or anywhere!).)