Comments on: Massachusetts’ loss is New Hampshire’s gain?

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:03:13 +0000

The Left had an early blow against independence with that. By tying Senators down to a democratic process of popular opinion, while still having the perks of being an elite cushioned from consequences, they struck a blow against the foundations of American stability.

A lot of what the Left does or what they use, appear harmless until the activation process goes critical and moves into the Final Stage.

The idea of a Leftist alliance existing even before the Soviet Union came to power, may seem ridiculous on the face. But one should never underestimate the Power of the Left.

By: rickl

rickl — Wed, 18 Dec 2013 03:01:57 +0000

This would have been much less likely to happen in the days before the 17th Amendment, when state legislators selected Senators to represent the state's interests.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Tue, 17 Dec 2013 23:41:57 +0000

I doubt the stupid party would have complied with the extra time for amendments.

By: nyght

nyght — Tue, 17 Dec 2013 23:24:35 +0000

Anyone ever wonder if electing Scott Brown to the Senate was an awful mistake in the first place? I mean, it was his election that gave us the rushed PPACA (Obamacare) in its final form, because the Dems no longer had a supermajority. Had he either not been elected, or at least not run on being the 40th vote against the PPACA, then maybe there would have been a chance to add a few amendments that might have helped kinda fix it…

By: blert

blert — Tue, 17 Dec 2013 20:59:12 +0000

Don’t tell Bob Wiley!

I give you the catatonic Dr. Leo Marvin as just one example of the damage possible.

By: KLSmith

KLSmith — Tue, 17 Dec 2013 20:49:14 +0000

Dumb blonde RINO.