Not for a minute.

Because stories about other such classes of K-12 kids who have been forced to–as part of their indoctrination in “multiculturalism”–have some “exposure” to Islam had them, as part of their exposure, reciting the “Shahada,” Islam’s profession of faith i.e. “There is not God but Allah, and Muhammad is his Prophet…” as part of the effort to understand what Islam is all about.

However, here is where one’s world-view, knowledge base, and beliefs come into play, as Muslims and us “unbelievers” see two entirely different things taking place.

For a clueless, if pissed off unbeliever parent, his kid had been coerced into attending a multicultural indoctrination class, including his kid having to parrot some words that Muslims say–annoying, but no biggie.

But, according to Muslim tradition and a lot of Muslim jurisprudence, in the eyes of many Muslims, once an unbeliever recites the Shahada–gun to the head, knife to the throat or not, willingly or unwillingly, with full knowledge of what that recitation means or not–the reciter has irrevocably and for all time become a Muslim.

Thus, for instance, the story several years ago of captured unbeliever newsmen in Iraq, forced to kneel and to recite the Shahada at gunpoint. This ritual may not have meant much to the captives, or its significance been understood by all of them, but I am quite sure it was significant and mattered very much to their Muslim captors.

Good point…but: If the note attached to the permanent record was touted as a punishment, one might assume parents would have legal recourse (though I’m not sure about that in the UK) since the students were being punished for the parents ‘mistake’.
If pushed on this, I’m sure the PC people would say that the note was simply a record that the student hadn’t received ‘training’ and was not intended as a punishment. We all know that’s crap, but that’s how it would be defended.

Also, those who arm themselves with the word have expanded from a handful of communists to the entire liberal and neoconservative establishment in nations all across the world.

Leon Trotsky, after helping Lenin to create the Soviet murder machine in which he and Trotsky killed 1 to 4 million people, was removed from power and expelled from the Soviet Union in the year 1929 after losing a power struggle to become Lenin’s successor to Josef Stalin.

However, before fading into the pages of history, Leon Trotsky would do one last thing in 1930 that would arguably cause more damage to the West than Stalin and his successors’ entire Soviet nuclear arsenal could ever have done.

He would invent a word that would empower literally the most rotten, traitorous weasels within the West to redefine those loyal to their people, their cultural traditions and way of life as the worst evil, and to send the government, the education system, and the mass media on an absolute royal crusade until they themselves and virtually everyone else around them actually believe it.

And this unholy creation would be repeated over and over again, bolstered by revisionist history fabricated by more of the same rotten weasels falsely portraying the white man as the sole perpetrator of slavery and genocide in the world, and this would go on and on until the West would submit via demoralization to the entire Trotskyist internationalist agenda without a single shot being fired.

We can see the final stages of this playing out right now, with racial double standards having been created here in America (at the expense of American whites, of course), with the creation of “racism” and “hate speech” offenses in Europe (only targeting the indigenous population, of course), with the Canadian and Australian governments having implemented “multiculturalism” as official state policy (at the expense of the pre-existing Canadian and Australian cultures), and most of all, with the huge wave of third-world immigration into the West, supported by all Western governments (otherwise it wouldn’t be happening), which is radically changing the makeup and culture of those countries, and is threatening their original populations with becoming a minority in their own countries within just a few decades.

did feminism do its job? is amnesties purpose to remove the culture that celebrates the individual, freedom, etc?

Census: White majority in U.S. gone by 2043
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/13/18934111-census-white-majority-in-us-gone-by-2043

For the first time, America’s racial and ethnic minorities now make up about half of the under-5 age group, the government said Thursday. It’s a historic shift that shows how young people are at the forefront of sweeping changes by race and class.

given the above and below, yes…

For the first time in more than a century, the number of deaths now exceeds births among white Americans. This “natural decrease” occurred several years before the government’s original projection, a sign of the white population decline soon to arrive. For now, the white population is still increasing slightly, due to immigration from Europe.

same thing in the UK and parts of Europe…

Europe is not heading for a population collapse
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/feb/05/europe-not-heading-for-population-collapse

all these people are doing is getting in good with the new residents by pretending they hate the old residents just as much as they are on their way out (permanently with the dinosaurs. after all, they are responsible for slavery and all the ills of the world, right?)

you will notice that the demographer writing, does not see population collapse in Europe, as he is pointing out the immigration of people from other countries to replace them and that these people are having babies.

How does it feel being the Neanderthal standing before your Cro Magnon?

will history remember the race that was too nice and generous and open and free and kind to survive?

given the winners, probably not…

ah. actually it IS a race, as race is not skin color, its culture… so blacks who have no culture are not racists, whites are for not letting go of their own culture. only in the past did color and location coincide.

we all misuse the word as we are too incurious to know what its invention was, who invented it, how it was used and why. the left used the word from that original pedigree, and everyone else cant even define it well.

up to the point where they say what you just said and are very wrong… this is why jews are a race, they are a culture that wont be erased. same with christians… same with all that they attack. its only idiots who think its skin color…

you cant replace the culture with your new designed one unless you get rid of the old ones, and so, a racist is a person that holds on to their old culture.

so if you like your constitution, like the US the way it was and all that YOU ARE A RACIST as you want to preserve that in some way.

in the original russian:

Славянофильство, мессианизм отсталости, строило свою философию на том, что русский народ и его церковь насквозь демократичны, а официальная Россия — это немецкая бюрократия, насажденная Петром. Маркс заметил по этому поводу: “Ведь точно так же и тевтонские ослы сваливают деспотизм Фридриха II и Ñ‚. д. на французов, как будто отсталые рабы не нуждаются всегда в цивилизованных рабах, чтобы пройти нужную выучку”. Это краткое замечание исчерпывает до дна не только старую философию славянофилов, но и новейшие откровения “расистов”.

and in english:

“Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great. Mark remarked upon this theme: “In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them.” This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the ‘racists.'”

how you hope to understand whats going on if you cant even understand the meaning of the words as they use them is beyond me.

but watching people throw around the common and often wrong meanings as if majority is what makes meaning and nothing else, and majority wrong is not possible… its the same attitude as to colelctive government, but applied someplace else!!!

yes, the majority can use the term wrong and not knwo its pedigree and meaning. and yes, the academics and politicos look down on you as rubes and idiots cause you cant even have a correct converstation on their level. ie. you cant even use words correctly in a sentence as far as they are concerned. so anything you put forth, propose, or even try to oppose, is null and void out of the gate for the same reason that most of us wont listen to children misuse terms and pretend to know what they mean!!!!!!

given that people prefer to flounder about as the smarter ones get this and go about their business amidst the others confusion, there really isnt anything to do… as long as they flounder, they are not dupes…

but would you like to swing on a star
carry moonbeams home in a jar
or be BETTER OFF THAN YOU ARE
you would you rather be a founder…

Yes, and the Attlee government was such a disaster for Britain that Churchill and the Tories were reelected. But it took six years for Brits to come to their senses, and by that time, the damage had been done.