<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: When the older lie is exposed&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2013/11/09/when-the-older-lie-is-exposed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/11/09/when-the-older-lie-is-exposed/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/11/09/when-the-older-lie-is-exposed/#comment-692504</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=33701#comment-692504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Way too many marks born every 10 minutes. Natural born warriors born every undocumented time period.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way too many marks born every 10 minutes. Natural born warriors born every undocumented time period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: M J R		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/11/09/when-the-older-lie-is-exposed/#comment-691965</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M J R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 22:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=33701#comment-691965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And we know quite well that this son of a b#tch can right the wrong very easily:

Given all the dozens of waivers and exceptions he&#039;s already carved out from *his* law -- regardless of what *his* law actually stipulates in terms of requirements -- he can easily, with a stroke of his proverbial presidential pen (the one he loves to use when Congress won&#039;t acquiesce to this or that), carve out one more, that stipulates &quot;if you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan, period, regardless of what my precious legislation may stipulate to the contrary.  PERIOD.&quot;

Case closed, problem solved.

Except he won&#039;t do that, and we (here) all know why.

Kinda like if I step on your foot, hard and deliberate, and I offer &quot;excuse me&quot;, with sincere, blinking &quot;who, me?&quot; eyes -- but I don&#039;t remove my foot from on top of yours.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And we know quite well that this son of a b#tch can right the wrong very easily:</p>
<p>Given all the dozens of waivers and exceptions he&#8217;s already carved out from *his* law &#8212; regardless of what *his* law actually stipulates in terms of requirements &#8212; he can easily, with a stroke of his proverbial presidential pen (the one he loves to use when Congress won&#8217;t acquiesce to this or that), carve out one more, that stipulates &#8220;if you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan, period, regardless of what my precious legislation may stipulate to the contrary.  PERIOD.&#8221;</p>
<p>Case closed, problem solved.</p>
<p>Except he won&#8217;t do that, and we (here) all know why.</p>
<p>Kinda like if I step on your foot, hard and deliberate, and I offer &#8220;excuse me&#8221;, with sincere, blinking &#8220;who, me?&#8221; eyes &#8212; but I don&#8217;t remove my foot from on top of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
