Present company likely excepted, mind you. There’s been little sign of abject whackery around here…

}}} Menopause, in which women stop menstruating and become infertile, has been a long-standing puzzle for biologists: Why would evolution have led to a trait that essentially reduces the reproductive potential of an animal?

Most other animals don’t go through menopause (although killer whales do). Even chimpanzees, humans’ closest living relatives, seem to reproduce into old age in the wild, and males even prefer older females.

This is just positively ephtarded:
“Most other animals don’t go through menopause (although killer whales do).”

MOST other animals don’t experience continuous estrus – that is, they aren’t “in heat” 24/7/365. So the burden of late-in-life menses is hardly the same.

And that’s in addition to other matters that clearly apply, mentioned in the article and/or comments.

}}} Menopause, in which women stop menstruating and become infertile, has been a long-standing puzzle for biologists: Why would evolution have led to a trait that essentially reduces the reproductive potential of an animal?

Most other animals don’t go through menopause (although killer whales do). Even chimpanzees, humans’ closest living relatives, seem to reproduce into old age in the wild, and males even prefer older females.</i
This is just positively ephtarded:
“Most other animals don’t go through menopause (although killer whales do).”
MOST other animals don’t experience continuous estrus — that is, they aren’t “in heat” 24/7/365. So the burden of late-in-life menses is hardly the same.

Actually, in the four cases I know, one of the perps was a man.

In another, the perp was a woman, but the court decided (finally, after a lot of games-playing by the woman) in the man’s favor entirely.

In the third the man won in court (against the woman perp) but found it impossible to enforce the decision because the woman basically had turned the child against the man.

Same things in the fourth.

So the courts were not in favor of the vindictive, weirdo women in these cases. But the courts were relatively powerless against the woman’s psychological warfare involving the child.

The only bullet proof people that can’t be detected easily are the sociopaths who basically “mimic” all social relationships, including their family ones. Those people are never “out of” disguise.

Catching evil people amounts to the same as catching spies. Give out disinformation, set a trap, and then watch the experiment unfold. A normal person would act perfectly natural in the trap and do logical things. A non normal person… won’t. There will be leaks. Inconsistencies.

If a person has always done good things in their life, to the point where you can’t find dirt on them, then it doesn’t matter if they are pretending. Because that kind of pretense might as well be the same as truth. If that person always treats people weaker than them with justice and kindness, if that person always respects the authority and wisdom of those stronger than them, then you at least have a very good chance of being treated the same, for a long time.

I am so sensitized to it, I see the signs in every female, and much prefer guitar playing and wood working.

Everything is our fault..
so once us guys are gone, then its utopia

“If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males.” — Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001

Psychology Today:
Our Low Birth Rate Is About Liberation
We miss the point when we talk about low fertility only in terms of economics
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/one-and-only/201302/our-low-birth-rate-is-about-liberation

It’s not just the economy, it’s liberation. Fifty years after The Feminine Mystique was named and exploded by Betty Friedan, this has never been truer for women. The pursuit of happiness has emerged as our new national ideology, trumping the age-old belief that parental duty is the very definition, of adulthood. Some think it’s the height of selfishness; I say it’s progress.

plummeting birth rates of the class that has to be removed is a form of progress for the leaders who think that what remains is theirs with a lot less competition (oh boy, don’t look at china).

the article ends with:

We still have the highest fertility rate in the developed world–where our numbers tend to lag is in happiness and well-being data. This is what women are getting hip to, and, as McQuillan has found, are doing so without the existential costs–forget economic ones–so many have predicted. This is why I’m doing my part to keep the birth rate low: it’s less a question of whether I want to scrape the bottom of my bank account for motherhood, but whether I want to put my liberated adulthood in hock as well.

If you read between the lines she is celebrating the success of Sangers eugenics.

The population of X declining, but don’t worry the population of the whole is increasing…

to the ones that don’t get it (and i am sure that neo and others do), that is called replacement

the wealthy women are replacing their competition and their children’s competition with ‘others’ and calling it progress…

of course, its progressive…

Chapter three of this saga is going to be interesting…

“A world where men and women would be equal is easy to visualize, for that precisely is what the Soviet Revolution promised.” — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, (New York, Random House, 1952), p.806

thats why i have trouble explaining things to people who are not experienced in it, as they consistently think that there was something rational i could do, or someone could do. ie. “that if only” disease set in

there was nothing rational to do, as there was nothing rational in the internal process, and so there was no real way to avoid the outcome as one state of two can never be maintained in perpetuity.

ESPECIALLY once the princess and the pea syndrome kicks in.

ie. over time of not having any real altercations or bad somethings, the more sensitive over time the person gets to more minor somethings

the less issue there is, the more their issue scale slides until minor issues are large enough to act upon and scratch the itch.

think of it as a form of emotional cabin fever
and why some volatile relationships are successful. they keep the sensitivity to small crap low, by blowing up all the time, and not being big enough to break it.

in a bizarre way, these personalities are the kind you have to have when your with a cheater. cheating does run in genetics, just as other strategies do. so just as cheaters and layabouts exist, what is the complimentary personalities for such?

of course, this is misery for the average person male or female who is not the complimentary crazy for the others crazy.

with nuttiness being normalized as assertive and other things, thanks to feminism, nuttiness is something to deal with not suppress and fix. (while mens not nuttiness, like fishing, has to stop)

you would be surprised how much of the issues that go on are a product of a feminine feminist press that plays on women and puts their relationships in turmoil.

maybe mrs normal thinks the article on the 10 ways to know he is cheating is funny, but ms wacko doesnt catch on. and suddenly guess what? ms wacko normal wants a divorce as she knows, and goes back to her old name, ms wacko borderline, buys a bunch of cats, gets toxiplasmosis gonddii, and the rest is a very common outcome (tongue in cheek and all)

not surprised at all

but then i have seen the terrifying more than once
and even survived two exceptionally terrifying
and my comments were not limited to divorce or relationships, but in the general population