<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bumblers: the story changes&#8230;again	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-588859</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-588859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Left needs to coerce Americans into maintaining the belief that most of terrorism comes from domestic American groups: like Christians, right wing militants, gun armed mobs, and Sarah Palin.


Only in this way, can they acquire enough power to crush human resistance to their rule. They plan to deal with Islam after they have won.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Left needs to coerce Americans into maintaining the belief that most of terrorism comes from domestic American groups: like Christians, right wing militants, gun armed mobs, and Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>Only in this way, can they acquire enough power to crush human resistance to their rule. They plan to deal with Islam after they have won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-587630</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-587630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would not have been easy for the Tsarnaevs to have obtained sufficient explosive material without help, a fair amount of money, and/or the ability to mill their own powder and a place to practice


Not true... 
Its very easy todo such
You ever try to buy a pound of black powder or dynamite...
Tge hard part is to not leave a trail... 
Aquisition or creation is easy
Impossible to stop jnless the population is mentally crippled like vodka pickled soviets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would not have been easy for the Tsarnaevs to have obtained sufficient explosive material without help, a fair amount of money, and/or the ability to mill their own powder and a place to practice</p>
<p>Not true&#8230;<br />
Its very easy todo such<br />
You ever try to buy a pound of black powder or dynamite&#8230;<br />
Tge hard part is to not leave a trail&#8230;<br />
Aquisition or creation is easy<br />
Impossible to stop jnless the population is mentally crippled like vodka pickled soviets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-586544</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-586544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Surellin: read the linked article, which explains the reasoning behind the statement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surellin: read the linked article, which explains the reasoning behind the statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ziontruth		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-586477</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziontruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-586477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Life imitates art:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/28/is-army-career-over-for-radical-islam-academic/?page=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Is Army career over for radical Islam academic?&lt;/a&gt;, from Washington Times, hat tip to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/04/pentagon_deep-sixes_lt_col_dooley_for_violating_muslim_pc.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;American Thinker&lt;/a&gt;.

That Latma video scene having the FBI agent arrested by his colleagues just for saying &quot;Muslims&quot; doesn&#039;t look so far-fetched.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life imitates art:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/28/is-army-career-over-for-radical-islam-academic/?page=all" rel="nofollow">Is Army career over for radical Islam academic?</a>, from Washington Times, hat tip to the <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/04/pentagon_deep-sixes_lt_col_dooley_for_violating_muslim_pc.html" rel="nofollow">American Thinker</a>.</p>
<p>That Latma video scene having the FBI agent arrested by his colleagues just for saying &#8220;Muslims&#8221; doesn&#8217;t look so far-fetched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Surellin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-586455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Surellin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-586455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot; It would not have been easy for the Tsarnaevs to have obtained sufficient explosive material without help, a fair amount of money, and/or the ability to mill their own powder and a place to practice&quot;.  I think I recall that the bombs had about 6 pounds of powder apiece, which they obtained from fireworks.  Hmmm, black powder is available at any gun shop, and (I just checked) costs about sixteen dollars a pound.  Pretty cheap and easy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; It would not have been easy for the Tsarnaevs to have obtained sufficient explosive material without help, a fair amount of money, and/or the ability to mill their own powder and a place to practice&#8221;.  I think I recall that the bombs had about 6 pounds of powder apiece, which they obtained from fireworks.  Hmmm, black powder is available at any gun shop, and (I just checked) costs about sixteen dollars a pound.  Pretty cheap and easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: southpaw		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-586451</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[southpaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-586451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Parker --
Thanks! I hope to reload the .260 Remington I just bought.  Factory ammo isn&#039;t plentiful, and it&#039;s at least $2/round. Plus most of what you can get your hands on doesn&#039;t take advantage of its potential. Definitely the .223 and probably the .270.  If I don&#039;t sell it, maybe the 7-30 Waters.  That&#039;s a really nice rifle but you can only get ammo by order, and I don&#039;t know how much longer it will be available.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parker &#8212;<br />
Thanks! I hope to reload the .260 Remington I just bought.  Factory ammo isn&#8217;t plentiful, and it&#8217;s at least $2/round. Plus most of what you can get your hands on doesn&#8217;t take advantage of its potential. Definitely the .223 and probably the .270.  If I don&#8217;t sell it, maybe the 7-30 Waters.  That&#8217;s a really nice rifle but you can only get ammo by order, and I don&#8217;t know how much longer it will be available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: parker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-586236</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 04:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-586236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[southpaw,

Start with your press and dies, and what caliber/s you want to reload. There are a variety of reloading tables depending up caliber.  Buy used or new brass (if you can get it), buy the appropriate primers, a variety of bullet weights, and a couple of recommended powders.  Follow the reloading tables and start with mild loads.  Slowly work up to more powerful loads.  Keep records of how your loads preform.  Borrow a chronograph.  After a while you will discover which recipe works best to perform the function you want your loads to achieve.  Target practice, hunting loads, and those loads that produce the best accuracy.  

This can take a lot of time and patience, but after a while you will discover what loads get the most from your particular firearm.  The beauty of reloading is you will eventually determine what functions best in a particular rifle or handgun.

I reload 8MM Mauser, 357 Mag, and 38 Special.  I have, through trial and error, discovered what loading recipes best fit my arms.  I have a FMJ load and a soft point load that get the best performance from my Mauser.  Same goes for +P 38 load, and my 357 Mag.  I have loads for my 357 that are practice loads, hunting loads fully capable of harvesting deer at 50-75 yards, and load that is best for stopping 2 leg predators in their tracks.

It a meditative practice.  However, if you&#039;re only interested in developing loads for a .223 it will be rather simple.  Find the load (bullet) and powder charge that best performs the task you want to fulllfill with our rifle. Once you find that, stock up on componets to replicate that load and crank then out to you heart&#039;s contentment.

I use RCBS Pro 2000 press and it never fails as long as I am attentive.  It won&#039;t crank out thousands per hour room be hour, but with practice it can crankfe out 100s per hour of high quality ammo to feed your freedom stick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>southpaw,</p>
<p>Start with your press and dies, and what caliber/s you want to reload. There are a variety of reloading tables depending up caliber.  Buy used or new brass (if you can get it), buy the appropriate primers, a variety of bullet weights, and a couple of recommended powders.  Follow the reloading tables and start with mild loads.  Slowly work up to more powerful loads.  Keep records of how your loads preform.  Borrow a chronograph.  After a while you will discover which recipe works best to perform the function you want your loads to achieve.  Target practice, hunting loads, and those loads that produce the best accuracy.  </p>
<p>This can take a lot of time and patience, but after a while you will discover what loads get the most from your particular firearm.  The beauty of reloading is you will eventually determine what functions best in a particular rifle or handgun.</p>
<p>I reload 8MM Mauser, 357 Mag, and 38 Special.  I have, through trial and error, discovered what loading recipes best fit my arms.  I have a FMJ load and a soft point load that get the best performance from my Mauser.  Same goes for +P 38 load, and my 357 Mag.  I have loads for my 357 that are practice loads, hunting loads fully capable of harvesting deer at 50-75 yards, and load that is best for stopping 2 leg predators in their tracks.</p>
<p>It a meditative practice.  However, if you&#8217;re only interested in developing loads for a .223 it will be rather simple.  Find the load (bullet) and powder charge that best performs the task you want to fulllfill with our rifle. Once you find that, stock up on componets to replicate that load and crank then out to you heart&#8217;s contentment.</p>
<p>I use RCBS Pro 2000 press and it never fails as long as I am attentive.  It won&#8217;t crank out thousands per hour room be hour, but with practice it can crankfe out 100s per hour of high quality ammo to feed your freedom stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: blert		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-586215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 02:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-586215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sharpie...

Your pal &#039;Arabstinian&#039; has enough make-up to qualify as a &#039;painted lady&#039; in the West.

In fact, the typical Arabstinian&#039;s only make-up is a styptic pencil -- to compensate for all of the flying fragments so common in the air pollution there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharpie&#8230;</p>
<p>Your pal &#8216;Arabstinian&#8217; has enough make-up to qualify as a &#8216;painted lady&#8217; in the West.</p>
<p>In fact, the typical Arabstinian&#8217;s only make-up is a styptic pencil &#8212; to compensate for all of the flying fragments so common in the air pollution there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sharpie		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-586213</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sharpie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 02:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-586213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s  a line of sight that will put you off your dinner.

http://www.drudgereport.com/

Wouldn&#039;t a remote control come in handy to turn that off? 

Modesty thy name is hijab. Snort! 

Snort, breath in, and guffaw.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s  a line of sight that will put you off your dinner.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.drudgereport.com/</a></p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a remote control come in handy to turn that off? </p>
<p>Modesty thy name is hijab. Snort! </p>
<p>Snort, breath in, and guffaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sharpie		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/27/bumblers-the-story-changes-again/#comment-586187</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sharpie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27149#comment-586187</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia loves Islam. Notice how it so gently, almost lovingly, explains the hijab:

&quot;a veil which covers the head which is particularly worn by Muslim women beyond the age of puberty in the presence of non-related adult males. It can further refer to any head, face, or body covering worn by Muslim women or men that conforms to a certain standard of modesty.&quot;

Ohh, how lovely. Modesty. Yeah. 

Wikipedia continues:

Although the Qur&#039;an stresses modesty, it does not specifically require women to keep their heads or faces covered. In fact, the Qur&#039;an never explicitly uses the term hijab in reference to body veiling in any context, instead utilizing the words khimÄr (Ø®Ù…Ø§Ø±) and jilbÄb (Ø¬Ù„Ø¨Ø§Ø¨), not hijab. Hijab or (Hejab) refers to The Rules of covering up. It never references the specific item or items of clothing used to cover up.

Ohh. How lovely. Modesty. We all like modesty, don&#039;t we. 

Wikepedia continues:

&quot;Islam does not promote celibacy; rather it condemns premarital sex and extramarital sex . In fact, according to Islam, marriage enables one to attain the highest form of righteousness within this sacred spiritual bond.&quot;

Am I getting a whiff a apologetics, here. It&#039;s that phrase &quot;in fact&quot; which tips me off. One uses the phrase &quot;in fact&quot; to set off an incorrect view. 

In fact, Wikipedia apologizes all the time for Islam. Notice this whiff regarding celebacy:

&quot;In fact, according to Islam, marriage enables one to attain the highest form of righteousness within this sacred spiritual bond.&quot; 

Really. Kind of different than that celibacy which enables Catholic priest to bugger children, huh? Yeah, just a little bit. 

Finally, note the gorgeous creature wearing a hijab:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Palestinian_women_with_hijab.jpg

Notice how the face is tilted forward to deemphasize the hijab.

Here&#039;s a better representation:

http://hotair.com/

Scroll down to see the lovely Mrs. Tsarnaev. Is there something about the hijab that concentrates mass in the lower half of the face. Kind of like a bulldog?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia loves Islam. Notice how it so gently, almost lovingly, explains the hijab:</p>
<p>&#8220;a veil which covers the head which is particularly worn by Muslim women beyond the age of puberty in the presence of non-related adult males. It can further refer to any head, face, or body covering worn by Muslim women or men that conforms to a certain standard of modesty.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ohh, how lovely. Modesty. Yeah. </p>
<p>Wikipedia continues:</p>
<p>Although the Qur&#8217;an stresses modesty, it does not specifically require women to keep their heads or faces covered. In fact, the Qur&#8217;an never explicitly uses the term hijab in reference to body veiling in any context, instead utilizing the words khimÄr (Ø®Ù…Ø§Ø±) and jilbÄb (Ø¬Ù„Ø¨Ø§Ø¨), not hijab. Hijab or (Hejab) refers to The Rules of covering up. It never references the specific item or items of clothing used to cover up.</p>
<p>Ohh. How lovely. Modesty. We all like modesty, don&#8217;t we. </p>
<p>Wikepedia continues:</p>
<p>&#8220;Islam does not promote celibacy; rather it condemns premarital sex and extramarital sex . In fact, according to Islam, marriage enables one to attain the highest form of righteousness within this sacred spiritual bond.&#8221;</p>
<p>Am I getting a whiff a apologetics, here. It&#8217;s that phrase &#8220;in fact&#8221; which tips me off. One uses the phrase &#8220;in fact&#8221; to set off an incorrect view. </p>
<p>In fact, Wikipedia apologizes all the time for Islam. Notice this whiff regarding celebacy:</p>
<p>&#8220;In fact, according to Islam, marriage enables one to attain the highest form of righteousness within this sacred spiritual bond.&#8221; </p>
<p>Really. Kind of different than that celibacy which enables Catholic priest to bugger children, huh? Yeah, just a little bit. </p>
<p>Finally, note the gorgeous creature wearing a hijab:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Palestinian_women_with_hijab.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Palestinian_women_with_hijab.jpg</a></p>
<p>Notice how the face is tilted forward to deemphasize the hijab.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a better representation:</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://hotair.com/</a></p>
<p>Scroll down to see the lovely Mrs. Tsarnaev. Is there something about the hijab that concentrates mass in the lower half of the face. Kind of like a bulldog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
