like the person who runs interference for the pick pocket, your going to help distract people so that they can more easily be victims… (dont matter what you think, it matters what you DO or dont do)”

I think this is probably the keystone highlight of what many here find disagreeable or merely just hateful about Art’s position.

If thoughts don’t matter, then certainly emotions should. But if one does not feel enough emotions to kill Leftist operatives in the US, I’m not sure what the benefit would be in harassing our allies over being less confrontational. After all, it’s not like there are people that offer up a “more confrontational” strategic vision.

If it matters what people do or don’t do, then it should greatly matter whether people have the training to kill terrorists and police thugs with their bare hands or not. It should definitely matter if they feel enough hate in their heart for enemies of humanity to do so, to train for that goal. Yet, the internet is not about physical violence, just verbal violence. Same concept, different scale. The internet is not the place for “doing” so to speak.

Physical action is better left for the physical world. The goal of humans should not be to convince or enforce their own views on others. The concept is to be able to work and live side by side with humans, whether they be criminals or pacifists. It doesn’t really matter whether everyone is willing to kill evil or not, whether they do what you think is the best strategic plan for victory or not. All of that is merely a waste of energy for a social, not a military, goal. Energy depletion tends to be logistically unfeasible in the long term war.

The Left’s evil will not abate until they are destroyed, until their power and backs are broken. In the meanwhile, what people do or say doesn’t really impact the final result so much. What people do or say after they begin to feel such emotions will be a more significant determinative factor.

In the end, one cannot change the world if convincing one’s closest allies to do what One Wills is becoming difficult/impossible.

The ancient magicians often had two paths in life.

1. Change the world.

2. Change yourself.

Changing the world might be the case of using propaganda to get power and being elected, in order to start dictating people’s beliefs and behaviors. But changing yourself doesn’t involve the world, just improving your own mind, body, spirit, and soul.

Humans live through social cooperation, for a single person often lacks the resources to be completely independent. Yet, some humans find it rather disgusting to always be subservient to what society demands of them, utilizing masks and deception merely to get by. Those humans often live by themselves, away from civilization, for they neither envy civilization nor do they depend upon civilization for survival.

In other words, if one cannot convince the people in the neighborhood, at least get all the resources stocked so that when the entire neighborhood goes up in flames, it won’t matter what they say, think, or do to you. If it didn’t matter to them what you thought before, it shouldn’t matter after either.

In this fashion, individuals can break free of the shackles society has put upon them to seek their own path in life. If they cannot convince or be convinced of the truth, then it is merely enough to set them free of external control. IQ or training isn’t a requirement. Emotions are. If people don’t feel dissatisfied enough, if they don’t hate it enough, they won’t do anything.

Considering the ineptness or mere corruption of the authorities, I would think many people would find it in their best interests to train to utilize lethal force with merely their hands. No metal detector or government official can easily take away that power, for it isn’t as much physical as internal. School shootings, terrorist kidnappings, government goons thrashing around at airports, it’s not a bad start in my view to start arming one’s mind, and not just one’s external tools (guns).

However, those two seemed to have been caught somewhat unprepared, with most of their training and mental energy devoted to other things. While it might have been necessary to keep the captive around in order to not give the plan away to the hunters, it wasn’t necessary to make him the driver. Nor was it necessary to leave his left hand and left leg intact. To save on energy, as well as prevent people from getting rid of restraints, destroying the body itself is the most efficient. On the reverse hand, so long as you can move and think, you have a chance to escape.

Without the ability to do these things silently and efficiently, one’s options are limited. Just as if you lack a weapon or a way to attack, your only option is to escape or obey. Could be better odds. If the only way a terrorist can kill or harm people is with weapons, then they can’t easily and silently crush their captive’s body in a way that does not draw attention. They have fewer options. Fewer options leads to less chances of success, for both prey and predator.

Why is the state then attempting to limit the options of the people the state is supposed to serve? Perhaps because the state must control the people just as the terrorists must control their captives.

And how do they expect to continue in the future once they make America full of sheep willing to do whatever the authorities with guns tell them to?

i am here re boston events / jihad and i see things are – well – just the same. too bad.

the co-exist sticker story appears to be bogus – too good to be true?

I, for one, am tired of your escalating rudeness toward Neo. For years now, she has patiently provided you with a platform for your lengthy maunderings. She consistently responds calmly and rationally to your accusations and your inability to understand much of what she writes. In response, she gets more accusations and insults and your increasingly shrill insistence that she should think only what you say she should think and post only what you say she should post. A few days ago you went so far as to suggest that she should not put up any new posts until you are done commenting on the old ones, and you indicated that you think she actually decides when to put up new posts based on the timing of your comments. Really? If that’s an example of your superior male rationality, I’ll take female dumbheadedness any time.

As others have repeatedly suggested, if you are so certain that other topics are more important than the ones Neo chooses to write about, you should start your own blog. However, THIS blog — regardless of your spittle-flying efforts to hijack one thread after another — does not belong to you and is not about you. Like the rest of us, you are a guest here. Your inability to understand that and behave accordingly — Aspergers or no Aspergers — does no favors at all for your theories about superior male intellect and rationality.

U did offer this advice: DO NOT get distracted by little details that do not matter: that’s good. But that’s a “not.” I wonder: Is there something positive we can do? To educate the uneducated seems futile: My “neighbors” either already agree or will not discuss it. Even people who agree it’s all over seem to be weary of talk. The situation seems to be over the cliff.

Finding peace within seems healthy and harmless.