<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wonder why you&#8217;ve been reading so much about George W. Bush lately?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:40:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584836</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot; I hate to think what Obama’s edifice will look like.&quot;

One assumes there will be a united country left to build it. I wonder about that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; I hate to think what Obama’s edifice will look like.&#8221;</p>
<p>One assumes there will be a united country left to build it. I wonder about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584835</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kerry was so smart he got off his swift boat and ran down some guy and executed him in the back of the head with a gunshot. That&#039;s how smart he was.

The Left has a craving for that kind of narcissistic nihilism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerry was so smart he got off his swift boat and ran down some guy and executed him in the back of the head with a gunshot. That&#8217;s how smart he was.</p>
<p>The Left has a craving for that kind of narcissistic nihilism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584683</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bush did come across as a simplistic, awkward speaker on TV. And it&#039;s frustrating that he would not give detailed defenses of his policies when he should have offered contextual perspective and corrected misinformation, and countered propaganda. Not doing so hurt the nation.

However, the disconnect is that Bush&#039;s speeches - when read - offer a lot of substance. Bush also comes across more polished as a speaker in person than on TV.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush did come across as a simplistic, awkward speaker on TV. And it&#8217;s frustrating that he would not give detailed defenses of his policies when he should have offered contextual perspective and corrected misinformation, and countered propaganda. Not doing so hurt the nation.</p>
<p>However, the disconnect is that Bush&#8217;s speeches &#8211; when read &#8211; offer a lot of substance. Bush also comes across more polished as a speaker in person than on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Saunders		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584665</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How can you say John Kerry&#039;s not smart?  He&#039;s the smartest person I&#039;ve ever heard of -- he&#039;s the only one I know who did what my mother told me to do -- &quot;It&#039;s just as easy to fall in love with a rich girl as it is a poor one,&quot; not once, but twice!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you say John Kerry&#8217;s not smart?  He&#8217;s the smartest person I&#8217;ve ever heard of &#8212; he&#8217;s the only one I know who did what my mother told me to do &#8212; &#8220;It&#8217;s just as easy to fall in love with a rich girl as it is a poor one,&#8221; not once, but twice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584618</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i guess its like the Carney hobo said
the Rubes get what they deserve...  
because you cant save them from being rubes 

[once they learn the hard way, they stop being rubes&quot;
but if the hard way negates a future, then it matters not]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess its like the Carney hobo said<br />
the Rubes get what they deserve&#8230;<br />
because you cant save them from being rubes </p>
<p>[once they learn the hard way, they stop being rubes&#8221;<br />
but if the hard way negates a future, then it matters not]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EO 13635: Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay 
EO 13636: Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity 
EO 13637: Administration of Reformed Export Controls 
EO 13638: Amendments to Executive Order 12777 
EO 13639: Establishment of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration 
EO 13640: Continuance of Advisory Council 
EO 13641: Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay 

delegation of powers is unconstitutional, becase those who dont own the power, cant delegate it. and they are representatives, as the people own the power, and so, our representatives are not technically allowed to delegate powers. 

but since people who are smart enough to know that, like neo, and others here, dont talk about it, we get ideas about the libraries, not any ideas as to what is being done or dismantled. 

&lt;b&gt;The doctrine of nondelegation describes the theory that one branch of government must not authorize another entity to exercise the power or function which it is constitutionally authorized to exercise itself. It is explicit or implicit in all written constitutions that impose a strict structural separation of powers. It is usually applied in questions of constitutionally improper delegations of powers of any of the three branches of government to either of the other, to the administrative state, or to private entities&lt;/b&gt;

anyone remember that? 
anyone remember the rule of law
Magna carta? 

i guess it dont matter if you remember it if you dont care to defend it, does it? 

Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013:
Section 1. Delegation of Functions. The following functions conferred upon the President by the Act, and related laws, are delegated as follows:

so it starts off with delegation of functions conferred on the president, to others. 

he basically reorganized our government and its powers and you think a library is whats important? 

he just transferred huge things to the secretary of state...  John Kerry  and to the secretary of defense... (i guess they will owe him big time, no?)

Those under section 3 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2753), with the exception of subsections (a)(1), (b), (c)(3), (c)(4), and (f) (22 U.S.C. 2753(a)(1), (b), (c)(3), (c)(4), and (f)), &lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;.

Those under section 5 (22 U.S.C. 2755) &lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;

Those under section 25 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2765) &lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;

Those under section 34 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2774) t&lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;

Those under section 35(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2775(a))&lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;

Those under section 36(b)(1) with respect to the certification of an emergency as provided by subsection (b)(1) and under sections 36(c) and (d) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1), (c), and (d)) &lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;

Those under sections 36(f)(2) and (f)(3) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(f)(2) and (f)(3)) &lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;
.
Those under section 38 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) to:
(i) &lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;, except as otherwise provided in this subsection.

Those under section 39(b) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2779(b)) &lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;.

Those under the portion of section 40A of the Act added by Public Law 104-164 (22 U.S.C. 2785), &lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt; insofar as they relate to commercial exports licensed under the Act

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Those under the portion of section 40A of the Act added by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-132) (22 U.S.C. 2781), to the Secretary of State&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Those under section 2(b)(6) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, as amended (12 U.S.C. 635(b)(6)) &lt;b&gt;to the Secretary of State&lt;/b&gt;. 

&lt;i&gt;Sec. 3. Allocation of Funds. Funds appropriated to the President for carrying out the Act shall be deemed to be allocated to the Secretary of Defense without any further action of the President.&lt;/i&gt;


i guess if your going to make a one party council system like a soveriegn democracy akin to china and russia, your going to have to violate the constitution and going to have to distrat the smart people so that you can act, and they will be looking at the decorations and bs at a photo op you created for the point.

how can people so smart be so dumb? 

all this has to do with reworking who we can sell weapons to... like the muslim brotherhood, and other such self proclaimed enemies... 

and its unilateral, delegated, and makes the people who were just given a job, more powerful than congress can make them!!! 

&lt;b&gt;care how reagan library is decoratd, and what was said that was offensive?  then i guess you dont care about the kings writs by the dear ruler dictating law and reverting us to pre magna carta rule.. REX LEX!!!!  as LEX REX is dead!!! &lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EO 13635: Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay<br />
EO 13636: Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity<br />
EO 13637: Administration of Reformed Export Controls<br />
EO 13638: Amendments to Executive Order 12777<br />
EO 13639: Establishment of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration<br />
EO 13640: Continuance of Advisory Council<br />
EO 13641: Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay </p>
<p>delegation of powers is unconstitutional, becase those who dont own the power, cant delegate it. and they are representatives, as the people own the power, and so, our representatives are not technically allowed to delegate powers. </p>
<p>but since people who are smart enough to know that, like neo, and others here, dont talk about it, we get ideas about the libraries, not any ideas as to what is being done or dismantled. </p>
<p><b>The doctrine of nondelegation describes the theory that one branch of government must not authorize another entity to exercise the power or function which it is constitutionally authorized to exercise itself. It is explicit or implicit in all written constitutions that impose a strict structural separation of powers. It is usually applied in questions of constitutionally improper delegations of powers of any of the three branches of government to either of the other, to the administrative state, or to private entities</b></p>
<p>anyone remember that?<br />
anyone remember the rule of law<br />
Magna carta? </p>
<p>i guess it dont matter if you remember it if you dont care to defend it, does it? </p>
<p>Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013:<br />
Section 1. Delegation of Functions. The following functions conferred upon the President by the Act, and related laws, are delegated as follows:</p>
<p>so it starts off with delegation of functions conferred on the president, to others. </p>
<p>he basically reorganized our government and its powers and you think a library is whats important? </p>
<p>he just transferred huge things to the secretary of state&#8230;  John Kerry  and to the secretary of defense&#8230; (i guess they will owe him big time, no?)</p>
<p>Those under section 3 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2753), with the exception of subsections (a)(1), (b), (c)(3), (c)(4), and (f) (22 U.S.C. 2753(a)(1), (b), (c)(3), (c)(4), and (f)), <b>to the Secretary of State</b>.</p>
<p>Those under section 5 (22 U.S.C. 2755) <b>to the Secretary of State</b></p>
<p>Those under section 25 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2765) <b>to the Secretary of State</b></p>
<p>Those under section 34 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2774) t<b>to the Secretary of State</b></p>
<p>Those under section 35(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2775(a))<b>to the Secretary of State</b></p>
<p>Those under section 36(b)(1) with respect to the certification of an emergency as provided by subsection (b)(1) and under sections 36(c) and (d) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1), (c), and (d)) <b>to the Secretary of State</b></p>
<p>Those under sections 36(f)(2) and (f)(3) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(f)(2) and (f)(3)) <b>to the Secretary of State</b><br />
.<br />
Those under section 38 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) to:<br />
(i) <b>to the Secretary of State</b>, except as otherwise provided in this subsection.</p>
<p>Those under section 39(b) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2779(b)) <b>to the Secretary of State</b>.</p>
<p>Those under the portion of section 40A of the Act added by Public Law 104-164 (22 U.S.C. 2785), <b>to the Secretary of State</b> insofar as they relate to commercial exports licensed under the Act</p>
<p><b><i>Those under the portion of section 40A of the Act added by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-132) (22 U.S.C. 2781), to the Secretary of State</i></b></p>
<p>Those under section 2(b)(6) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, as amended (12 U.S.C. 635(b)(6)) <b>to the Secretary of State</b>. </p>
<p><i>Sec. 3. Allocation of Funds. Funds appropriated to the President for carrying out the Act shall be deemed to be allocated to the Secretary of Defense without any further action of the President.</i></p>
<p>i guess if your going to make a one party council system like a soveriegn democracy akin to china and russia, your going to have to violate the constitution and going to have to distrat the smart people so that you can act, and they will be looking at the decorations and bs at a photo op you created for the point.</p>
<p>how can people so smart be so dumb? </p>
<p>all this has to do with reworking who we can sell weapons to&#8230; like the muslim brotherhood, and other such self proclaimed enemies&#8230; </p>
<p>and its unilateral, delegated, and makes the people who were just given a job, more powerful than congress can make them!!! </p>
<p><b>care how reagan library is decoratd, and what was said that was offensive?  then i guess you dont care about the kings writs by the dear ruler dictating law and reverting us to pre magna carta rule.. REX LEX!!!!  as LEX REX is dead!!! </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584606</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584606</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I came here tlfind some dizcuzsion on key things but notice its not here.... here where there r claims that such a negative end.... ibnores it like ignoring the titanic sknking while discussing the music and cannopes 

Unti now
I found it hard to belive my family
But now its zcarier 
They were right
The key people abxicate their livescto the focused

The focused are free to take if away too

The closer the change the less the more important want to look

It  dont matter if losers focus on it
They cant stop it with no head
It matters the smart n able whlcould think take a mental vacationhoping things get better while yhey afe absent

Soon tbere will be no place in the universe u can go to be free and live ur life

The last place is going with less derense than the firsts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came here tlfind some dizcuzsion on key things but notice its not here&#8230;. here where there r claims that such a negative end&#8230;. ibnores it like ignoring the titanic sknking while discussing the music and cannopes </p>
<p>Unti now<br />
I found it hard to belive my family<br />
But now its zcarier<br />
They were right<br />
The key people abxicate their livescto the focused</p>
<p>The focused are free to take if away too</p>
<p>The closer the change the less the more important want to look</p>
<p>It  dont matter if losers focus on it<br />
They cant stop it with no head<br />
It matters the smart n able whlcould think take a mental vacationhoping things get better while yhey afe absent</p>
<p>Soon tbere will be no place in the universe u can go to be free and live ur life</p>
<p>The last place is going with less derense than the firsts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Its not because of theclibrary...
If you canblow off maggies funeral whats a library??

Maybe ghey dont want you to notice natinalizers (nazi) dojng there thing to voting

The Commission will focus on polling places, how better to train and recruit poll workers, managing voter rolls and poll books, voting machines, ballot simplicity, English proficiency, and absentee ballots. The states--not the federal government--traditionally have responsibility over such matters. 


And not notice gliechshaltung
Or lots of stuff

But i have learned a sucker is a sucker by nature
So you get what you deserve based on what u ficus on

Focus on living, a future, lives, freedom
U have a chance of protecting them
Put ur head up ur but with ur hind quarters up trying to bd dntertained u end up with getting screwed

We forget tge lesson of weimars cosmopolitans who did not want ghe party to stop so tgey refused to focus on whats important jn dangerous times

Its why hitory repeats
U dont see ur opposition taking diversions 
Do you???

Just remember two things

The fool who drives off ghe cliff thoight their reasons as good as anyones as we all do. The outcome is what decidss and abdicating ghat left the field to two despotisms n no third choice..

The environment is fertile...
We are not battlkng one despotism
But many
And their behavior shows gheh know it
But r not sure who will grab the undefended prize

Better take a look what they did while u r distracted
Ever see hunters catch skjn, eat distracted prey
Or bone piles from being driven

To ghink its gokng away with barely a protest
As the victims have termjnal adhd in a forest of distractins they cant navigate out of as they keep forgetting what hey were dojng and what brought them ghere

Its like watchkng a dog go from growlkng a d protectjng all to dancjng for a hotdog

And until ghey hit bottom
They will believe their fantasy over experience

Want to know the dofference between young and whole and old and dxperienced

SCARS

The youts fofget we were yojng and beautiful toobefore zcars

They will have deeper scars because they will be naked before gheir keepers..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not because of theclibrary&#8230;<br />
If you canblow off maggies funeral whats a library??</p>
<p>Maybe ghey dont want you to notice natinalizers (nazi) dojng there thing to voting</p>
<p>The Commission will focus on polling places, how better to train and recruit poll workers, managing voter rolls and poll books, voting machines, ballot simplicity, English proficiency, and absentee ballots. The states&#8211;not the federal government&#8211;traditionally have responsibility over such matters. </p>
<p>And not notice gliechshaltung<br />
Or lots of stuff</p>
<p>But i have learned a sucker is a sucker by nature<br />
So you get what you deserve based on what u ficus on</p>
<p>Focus on living, a future, lives, freedom<br />
U have a chance of protecting them<br />
Put ur head up ur but with ur hind quarters up trying to bd dntertained u end up with getting screwed</p>
<p>We forget tge lesson of weimars cosmopolitans who did not want ghe party to stop so tgey refused to focus on whats important jn dangerous times</p>
<p>Its why hitory repeats<br />
U dont see ur opposition taking diversions<br />
Do you???</p>
<p>Just remember two things</p>
<p>The fool who drives off ghe cliff thoight their reasons as good as anyones as we all do. The outcome is what decidss and abdicating ghat left the field to two despotisms n no third choice..</p>
<p>The environment is fertile&#8230;<br />
We are not battlkng one despotism<br />
But many<br />
And their behavior shows gheh know it<br />
But r not sure who will grab the undefended prize</p>
<p>Better take a look what they did while u r distracted<br />
Ever see hunters catch skjn, eat distracted prey<br />
Or bone piles from being driven</p>
<p>To ghink its gokng away with barely a protest<br />
As the victims have termjnal adhd in a forest of distractins they cant navigate out of as they keep forgetting what hey were dojng and what brought them ghere</p>
<p>Its like watchkng a dog go from growlkng a d protectjng all to dancjng for a hotdog</p>
<p>And until ghey hit bottom<br />
They will believe their fantasy over experience</p>
<p>Want to know the dofference between young and whole and old and dxperienced</p>
<p>SCARS</p>
<p>The youts fofget we were yojng and beautiful toobefore zcars</p>
<p>They will have deeper scars because they will be naked before gheir keepers..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gringo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584557</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gringo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Conrad, I stopped reading Jonathan Chait after his essay on epistemic closure, where he set himself as the impartial judge to conclude that wingnuts - as opposed to libs- do not consider opinions which would upset their conceptual apple carts.

Chait is such an objective judge that some years previous he bean an article in the New Republic thusly: &lt;i&gt;&quot;I hate President George W. Bush.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Such a person setting himself as an objective judge is , to put it mildly, absurd. Chait is just a partisan hack. A bright hack, it is to be admitted, but still a hack.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conrad, I stopped reading Jonathan Chait after his essay on epistemic closure, where he set himself as the impartial judge to conclude that wingnuts &#8211; as opposed to libs- do not consider opinions which would upset their conceptual apple carts.</p>
<p>Chait is such an objective judge that some years previous he bean an article in the New Republic thusly: <i>&#8220;I hate President George W. Bush.&#8221;</i> Such a person setting himself as an objective judge is , to put it mildly, absurd. Chait is just a partisan hack. A bright hack, it is to be admitted, but still a hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Harold		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/25/wonder-why-youve-been-reading-so-much-about-george-w-bush-lately/#comment-584550</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=27116#comment-584550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t much care about Presidential libraries given an overweening federal budget of 4 TRILLION dollars.

The subject of Bush&#039;s intelligence is just another smear by the left. Does anyone think that the imbecile buffoon Biden is intelligent? The left has no morals, no values, no principles, no ethics. They will say and do anything whatsoever to achieve and hold power. 

The problem with Bush was that he was/is inarticulate. He refused to defend his positions and the war abandoning the debate to the left giving us Obama and Pelosi.

We&#039;ve had more then enough Bush. Let&#039;s pick a candidate who is intelligent, articulate and charismatic. There has to be someone on the right who fits the bill. Otherwise just curl up in the fetal position and wait for the collapse of the country.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t much care about Presidential libraries given an overweening federal budget of 4 TRILLION dollars.</p>
<p>The subject of Bush&#8217;s intelligence is just another smear by the left. Does anyone think that the imbecile buffoon Biden is intelligent? The left has no morals, no values, no principles, no ethics. They will say and do anything whatsoever to achieve and hold power. </p>
<p>The problem with Bush was that he was/is inarticulate. He refused to defend his positions and the war abandoning the debate to the left giving us Obama and Pelosi.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had more then enough Bush. Let&#8217;s pick a candidate who is intelligent, articulate and charismatic. There has to be someone on the right who fits the bill. Otherwise just curl up in the fetal position and wait for the collapse of the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
