Seems to me like someone else was pulling the strings; I don’t understand how a mediocre human being like Tamarlan Tsarnaev managed to orchestrate something this successfully yet had no contingency plan for his own escape.

And vanderleun, thanks for making me laugh. I needed that.

You see he apparently had an epiphany, and is now telling the Feds all they need to know. Or maybe all they want to hear.

Just when you think the government, and their merry media band, have strained credulity to the extreme, they go a step beyond.

Anyone shocked that the FBI apparently missed the trip to the Russian Caucasus region (a hot bed of extremism) allegedly due to a misspelling on an airline manifest? Really? That’s the excuse? As I recall from my traveling days, most countries have passport control when you leave, as well as when you enter. But the good old USA leaves it to the airlines to check passports on departure. Still, we do pay folks to sit in booths at international arrivals so as to create long lines of weary travelers; and presumably to check passports, visas, do-not-enter lists, etc. Clearly, something went badly awry somewhere when a guy who was previously questioned by the FBI turns up at one of those checkpoints with a brand new Russian passport. Can you think of any questions to ask him? Will heads roll? Big Sis? Nah!

Its comical tradjedy”

Slow the F down lest you froth right out of the frame.

They are habitualized to other conditions
So they act or do things that those familiar know better

Most americans when it comes to the current despotic system act exactly out of place as these guys look to you

Ur EXPERIANCE lets u see what they dont
To convince them u have to get beyond belief to ghinking

Its comical tradjedy of the infinite goof

Your basically repeating my missive but from symptom not cause – that knowledge if integrated changes behavior

So u look at them and put out the logic
Yet u forget ur own parry of the same!!!
U were not interested and neither were they
Lack of interest leads to lack of consideration wbich leads to inaction that others who did learn can see IN OTHERSbut not themselves

Same when someone makes up an dxplanation talking to someone that knows more….

Summed up to
You cant bs a bser

Just imagine if they gave u that same answer

U would have a hard time convkncing ghem

Interesting documentary last night got wife n i in a short argument… they put up a card trick n she could not tell me how they knew which card she picked

Everytime i tried tk dxplain… shexwould azsert and fight
Took slowing down the tape and showing her that none of the secknd set matched he first…. so if she took the mental shortcut to see if hers was missing… she would be fooled… her attention was on her card…not the others… my freaky memory could recite both sets….

Until she stoppdd defendjng she could not see the trick and sociuld not change belief…. her reflex is to guard against that

Same thing here…
One the deal implication or premise is believed you incorporate it and its active in your choices wrong or right

But jntil u do
You will claim h know
Defend ur belif Nd act taht way
And those that know will see you and know

The terrorists will say gheh nnow about cameras
But knowing didnot change belief
Sk did not get incorporated into action

Now u look n u see
Just as i look and see what i cant explain in a way ghat will jostle u the way video did my wife

🙂