<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Congressional GOP&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:54:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: davisbr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/#comment-574908</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davisbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26687#comment-574908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like to say that if you know that sometimes &lt;em&gt;losing&lt;/em&gt; a battle ...or three ...can be the sole reason for &lt;em&gt;winning&lt;/em&gt; the war, you have a good grasp on the difference between the merely tactical, and the brilliantly strategic.

...not that the GOP has ever impressed upon me their ability to execute either.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to say that if you know that sometimes <em>losing</em> a battle &#8230;or three &#8230;can be the sole reason for <em>winning</em> the war, you have a good grasp on the difference between the merely tactical, and the brilliantly strategic.</p>
<p>&#8230;not that the GOP has ever impressed upon me their ability to execute either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martel		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/#comment-574776</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26687#comment-574776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have no idea if this guy&#039;s right or not, if this is fictional or actual, but he&#039;s been right before:

http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/04/08/republican-insider-democrats-trying-to-use-guns-to-kill-the-tea-party-and-win-2014/

The idea is that Dems are using this it divide the tea party from the old dogs and that if the senate passes a &quot;reasonable compromise&quot;, the House can be framed as intransigent and extremist when they don&#039;t pass it.

Also, it looks like Toomey got something out of the deal:

http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/04/11/toomeys-shame-gun-control-group-drops-attack-after-republican-senator-makes-deal-with-dems/

No idea if any of this is right, but this may be a question of strategy 1 vs. strategy 2 instead of strategy vs no strategy.

When I&#039;m not sure which strategy would be best, I tend to favor the one that cedes the least ground.  The Dems are naturally way better at this stuff and they have the ever-friendly media to frame things for them.  This doesn&#039;t make trapping them by giving them what they want impossible, but it does make it harder.

Besides, isn&#039;t that how we got the income tax?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea if this guy&#8217;s right or not, if this is fictional or actual, but he&#8217;s been right before:</p>
<p><a href="http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/04/08/republican-insider-democrats-trying-to-use-guns-to-kill-the-tea-party-and-win-2014/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/04/08/republican-insider-democrats-trying-to-use-guns-to-kill-the-tea-party-and-win-2014/</a></p>
<p>The idea is that Dems are using this it divide the tea party from the old dogs and that if the senate passes a &#8220;reasonable compromise&#8221;, the House can be framed as intransigent and extremist when they don&#8217;t pass it.</p>
<p>Also, it looks like Toomey got something out of the deal:</p>
<p><a href="http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/04/11/toomeys-shame-gun-control-group-drops-attack-after-republican-senator-makes-deal-with-dems/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/04/11/toomeys-shame-gun-control-group-drops-attack-after-republican-senator-makes-deal-with-dems/</a></p>
<p>No idea if any of this is right, but this may be a question of strategy 1 vs. strategy 2 instead of strategy vs no strategy.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;m not sure which strategy would be best, I tend to favor the one that cedes the least ground.  The Dems are naturally way better at this stuff and they have the ever-friendly media to frame things for them.  This doesn&#8217;t make trapping them by giving them what they want impossible, but it does make it harder.</p>
<p>Besides, isn&#8217;t that how we got the income tax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/#comment-574725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26687#comment-574725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most can&#039;t define strategy or tactics or what is the difference

The same people like to make up strategies that have no tactical way of working without despotism

:)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most can&#8217;t define strategy or tactics or what is the difference</p>
<p>The same people like to make up strategies that have no tactical way of working without despotism</p>
<p>🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ann		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/#comment-574445</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26687#comment-574445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The tactics certainly are dumb. 

Must be because the strategy hasn&#039;t been agreed on. Cruz, I think, wants almost no gun regulations, and McConnell is probably up for quite a few. And so we end up with this darn seat-of-pants incompetence.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tactics certainly are dumb. </p>
<p>Must be because the strategy hasn&#8217;t been agreed on. Cruz, I think, wants almost no gun regulations, and McConnell is probably up for quite a few. And so we end up with this darn seat-of-pants incompetence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rickl		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/#comment-574360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26687#comment-574360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Compromising on basic principles is not strategy, and it is not acceptable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compromising on basic principles is not strategy, and it is not acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KLSmith		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/#comment-574313</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KLSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26687#comment-574313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see..... WSJ editorial board (pro-amnesty, tea partiers are hobbits) vs Mike Lee and Ted Cruz.
No contest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230;.. WSJ editorial board (pro-amnesty, tea partiers are hobbits) vs Mike Lee and Ted Cruz.<br />
No contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KLSmith		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/#comment-574310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KLSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26687#comment-574310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[parker: exactly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>parker: exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: parker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/#comment-574305</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26687#comment-574305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Its a bad move on Toomey&#039;s part.  The Toomey-Manchin &#039;deal&#039; is lipstick on the pig of Schumer&#039;s bill.  This is a gift to the democrats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a bad move on Toomey&#8217;s part.  The Toomey-Manchin &#8216;deal&#8217; is lipstick on the pig of Schumer&#8217;s bill.  This is a gift to the democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam L.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/10/the-congressional-gop/#comment-574283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam L.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26687#comment-574283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Both.  Or maybe, BOTH!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both.  Or maybe, BOTH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
