<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: RIP Margaret Thatcher	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CV		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-573325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-573325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some great Thatcher quotes courtesy of RedAlertpolitics:

1. “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”

2. “Pennies don’t fall from heaven, they have to be earned here on earth.”

3. “No one would remember the Good Samaritan if he’d only had good intentions; he had money as well.”

4. “Economics are the method; the object is to change the heart and soul.”

5. “My policies are based not on some economics theory, but on things I and millions like me were brought up with: an honest day’s work for an honest day’s pay; live within your means; put by a nest egg for a rainy day; pay your bills on time; support the police.”

6. “The choice facing the nation is between two totally different ways of life. And what a prize we have to fight for: no less than the chance to banish from our land the dark, divisive clouds of Marxist socialism and bring together men and women from all walks of life who share a belief in freedom.”

And finally (paraphrasing St. Francis of Assisi):

7. “Where there is discord, may we bring harmony. Where there is error, may we bring truth. Where there is doubt, may we bring faith. And where there is despair, may we bring hope.”

http://redalertpolitics.com/2013/04/08/7-margaret-thatcher-quotes-to-inspire-conservatives/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great Thatcher quotes courtesy of RedAlertpolitics:</p>
<p>1. “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”</p>
<p>2. “Pennies don’t fall from heaven, they have to be earned here on earth.”</p>
<p>3. “No one would remember the Good Samaritan if he’d only had good intentions; he had money as well.”</p>
<p>4. “Economics are the method; the object is to change the heart and soul.”</p>
<p>5. “My policies are based not on some economics theory, but on things I and millions like me were brought up with: an honest day’s work for an honest day’s pay; live within your means; put by a nest egg for a rainy day; pay your bills on time; support the police.”</p>
<p>6. “The choice facing the nation is between two totally different ways of life. And what a prize we have to fight for: no less than the chance to banish from our land the dark, divisive clouds of Marxist socialism and bring together men and women from all walks of life who share a belief in freedom.”</p>
<p>And finally (paraphrasing St. Francis of Assisi):</p>
<p>7. “Where there is discord, may we bring harmony. Where there is error, may we bring truth. Where there is doubt, may we bring faith. And where there is despair, may we bring hope.”</p>
<p><a href="http://redalertpolitics.com/2013/04/08/7-margaret-thatcher-quotes-to-inspire-conservatives/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://redalertpolitics.com/2013/04/08/7-margaret-thatcher-quotes-to-inspire-conservatives/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ziontruth		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-573280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziontruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-573280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[rickl,

&quot;...and I&#039;m glad to see that I am not alone.&quot;

It&#039;s amazing how this thought is repeated by so many ZTVers. I thought I was the only one too. Look at the comments on the American Thinker article, or on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/04/08/broadcasters-worried-about-zero-tv-homes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hot Air headline&lt;/a&gt;, and you can only be heartened.

It&#039;s a stab at undoing Gramsci. That&#039;s why I&#039;m so excited by this news.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rickl,</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;and I&#8217;m glad to see that I am not alone.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how this thought is repeated by so many ZTVers. I thought I was the only one too. Look at the comments on the American Thinker article, or on the <a href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/04/08/broadcasters-worried-about-zero-tv-homes/" rel="nofollow">Hot Air headline</a>, and you can only be heartened.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a stab at undoing Gramsci. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m so excited by this news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rickl		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-572904</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-572904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ziontruth Says: 
April 8th, 2013 at 2:28 pm
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;On a more optimistic tone: Is yours a ‘zero TV’ home? from The American Thinker. A possible harbinger of the people breaking the yoke of the Mainstream Media all by themselves.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yep!  For years I had gradually been losing interest in TV entertainment, but would still watch news and sports.  After Election Night 2008 I quit watching TV news, but would still occasionally watch sports.  After the 2012 election I cancelled my cable TV subscription and turned in my converter boxes.  I realized that the money I was paying was going to support the TV channels whether I watched them or not.  So I made a conscious decision to cut off my financial support.  It was a small gesture on my part to &quot;starve the beast&quot;, and I&#039;m glad to see that I am not alone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ziontruth Says:<br />
April 8th, 2013 at 2:28 pm</p>
<blockquote cite=""><p>On a more optimistic tone: Is yours a ‘zero TV’ home? from The American Thinker. A possible harbinger of the people breaking the yoke of the Mainstream Media all by themselves.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep!  For years I had gradually been losing interest in TV entertainment, but would still watch news and sports.  After Election Night 2008 I quit watching TV news, but would still occasionally watch sports.  After the 2012 election I cancelled my cable TV subscription and turned in my converter boxes.  I realized that the money I was paying was going to support the TV channels whether I watched them or not.  So I made a conscious decision to cut off my financial support.  It was a small gesture on my part to &#8220;starve the beast&#8221;, and I&#8217;m glad to see that I am not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rickl		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-572898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-572898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Charles Says: 
April 8th, 2013 at 1:56 pm
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; Brilliant! She (and other like-thinkers) truly had an understanding that liberals don’t get. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
RINOs don&#039;t seem to get it either, or at least they are unable to articulate it.


Steve Says: 
April 8th, 2013 at 4:58 pm
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;Obama talks about fairness. He could care less that the poorer are poorer (as they are today) just so long as the gap between the rich and poor is smaller.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And even that is a lie.  Socialism is a fraud.  It&#039;s a modern-day form of feudalism.  It collapses and impoverishes the middle class (the bourgeoisie), but leaves those at the very top untouched.  Look at the &lt;i&gt;nomenklatura&lt;/i&gt; in the Soviet Union, or the hereditary monarchy in North Korea, or the fact that the &quot;man of the people&quot; Hugo Chavez was worth billions when he died.  

Look at how the Obamas live like royalty on the taxpayer&#039;s dime.  There&#039;s a certain mentality among the poor where they don&#039;t mind their leaders living like kings, yet they want to punish the guy down the street who has a bigger house or a nicer car.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Says:<br />
April 8th, 2013 at 1:56 pm</p>
<blockquote cite=""><p> Brilliant! She (and other like-thinkers) truly had an understanding that liberals don’t get. </p></blockquote>
<p>RINOs don&#8217;t seem to get it either, or at least they are unable to articulate it.</p>
<p>Steve Says:<br />
April 8th, 2013 at 4:58 pm</p>
<blockquote cite=""><p>Obama talks about fairness. He could care less that the poorer are poorer (as they are today) just so long as the gap between the rich and poor is smaller.</p></blockquote>
<p>And even that is a lie.  Socialism is a fraud.  It&#8217;s a modern-day form of feudalism.  It collapses and impoverishes the middle class (the bourgeoisie), but leaves those at the very top untouched.  Look at the <i>nomenklatura</i> in the Soviet Union, or the hereditary monarchy in North Korea, or the fact that the &#8220;man of the people&#8221; Hugo Chavez was worth billions when he died.  </p>
<p>Look at how the Obamas live like royalty on the taxpayer&#8217;s dime.  There&#8217;s a certain mentality among the poor where they don&#8217;t mind their leaders living like kings, yet they want to punish the guy down the street who has a bigger house or a nicer car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: expat		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-572894</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[expat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-572894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Paul Gigot at WSJ mentioned three things that Thatcher stood for: financial freedom, national self-respect, and personal virtue. The first and the last are often talked about in the US by fiscal and social conservatives, but national self-respect gets short shrift  in our political discussions. We are all too often forced in to apologizing for not being perfect. We brainwash the young into thinking we are the worst country ever, and we tell immigrants that they should choose their original culture over ours. We really need to follow Thatcher and learn to walk upright once again. 

I think Thatcher&#039;s strength came because her principles were formed by her life experience rather than ideology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Gigot at WSJ mentioned three things that Thatcher stood for: financial freedom, national self-respect, and personal virtue. The first and the last are often talked about in the US by fiscal and social conservatives, but national self-respect gets short shrift  in our political discussions. We are all too often forced in to apologizing for not being perfect. We brainwash the young into thinking we are the worst country ever, and we tell immigrants that they should choose their original culture over ours. We really need to follow Thatcher and learn to walk upright once again. </p>
<p>I think Thatcher&#8217;s strength came because her principles were formed by her life experience rather than ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: n.n		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-572826</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n.n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-572826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The principles we must preserve are individual dignity and sanctity of human life.  These are axiomatic truths which most people accept for granted, but are routinely denied by some minority interests.  Any proposed philosophy must be based on these principles and reconcilable with natural constraints (e.g. finitely available and accessible resources, evolutionary principles -- fitness), and must be internally, externally, and mutually consistent.

Socialism fails because it denies individual dignity and marginalizes the value of human life.  It is a system designed to consolidate capital and control in minority hands through redistributive change and other coercive acts.  It is defended and propagated with the false promise of &quot;equality.&quot;  Its proponents exploit opportunistic and vulnerability traits in the population, by promising material (e.g. money), physical (e.g. abortion), and ego (e.g. self-esteem) instant (or immediate) gratification without consequences.  It also marginalizes and eviscerates competing interests, which permits corruption to progress unchecked.

There are better compromises between men and women, which are capable of respecting individual dignity, and preserving the intrinsic value of human life.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The principles we must preserve are individual dignity and sanctity of human life.  These are axiomatic truths which most people accept for granted, but are routinely denied by some minority interests.  Any proposed philosophy must be based on these principles and reconcilable with natural constraints (e.g. finitely available and accessible resources, evolutionary principles &#8212; fitness), and must be internally, externally, and mutually consistent.</p>
<p>Socialism fails because it denies individual dignity and marginalizes the value of human life.  It is a system designed to consolidate capital and control in minority hands through redistributive change and other coercive acts.  It is defended and propagated with the false promise of &#8220;equality.&#8221;  Its proponents exploit opportunistic and vulnerability traits in the population, by promising material (e.g. money), physical (e.g. abortion), and ego (e.g. self-esteem) instant (or immediate) gratification without consequences.  It also marginalizes and eviscerates competing interests, which permits corruption to progress unchecked.</p>
<p>There are better compromises between men and women, which are capable of respecting individual dignity, and preserving the intrinsic value of human life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-572806</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-572806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How right she is. Obama talks about fairness. He could care less that the poorer are poorer (as they are today) just so long as the gap between the rich and poor is smaller. So dumb it beggars belief.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How right she is. Obama talks about fairness. He could care less that the poorer are poorer (as they are today) just so long as the gap between the rich and poor is smaller. So dumb it beggars belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J.J. formerly Jimmy J.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-572754</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.J. formerly Jimmy J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-572754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The British Lioness! Thank God we have videos of her like that one.  And her Thatcherisms - wisdom for the  ages.  RIP dear Lady.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The British Lioness! Thank God we have videos of her like that one.  And her Thatcherisms &#8211; wisdom for the  ages.  RIP dear Lady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-572736</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-572736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ann: the thing about Thatcher in that video (besides her obvious delight in skewering that guy) was that she really had the left&#039;s number, didn&#039;t she?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann: the thing about Thatcher in that video (besides her obvious delight in skewering that guy) was that she really had the left&#8217;s number, didn&#8217;t she?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ann		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/04/08/rip-margaret-thatcher/#comment-572734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26638#comment-572734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting that video -- what an impressive performance.

I&#039;ve often thought that Hillary Clinton has always wanted to be our Thatcher, although from the left, of course.

But she&#039;ll never come close. Can&#039;t imagine Thatcher ever saying &quot;what difference does it make,&quot; as Hillary did in her testimony about the Benghazi debacle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that video &#8212; what an impressive performance.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often thought that Hillary Clinton has always wanted to be our Thatcher, although from the left, of course.</p>
<p>But she&#8217;ll never come close. Can&#8217;t imagine Thatcher ever saying &#8220;what difference does it make,&#8221; as Hillary did in her testimony about the Benghazi debacle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
