<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The SSM slippery slope?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: davisbr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-567240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davisbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-567240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I asked the question for years on Ace, whenever Malor brought up SSM: do your presumed 14th amendment rights trump my 2nd amendment rights?

The answer was always the same (because Gabe is a very smart guy): crickets.

...I finally gave up asking the question ...he wasn&#039;t going to fall into my &quot;trap&quot;, lol.

The only resolution to the question that is possible is to get the government out of the marriage business.

...which will not happen, &lt;a href=&quot;http://neoneocon.com/2013/03/27/doma-unconstitutional/#comment-564991&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;as per my comments&lt;/a&gt; in the thread &lt;a href=&quot;http://neoneocon.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565543&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sharpie so kindly mentioned above&lt;/a&gt;.

I am no longer sanguine about the American Experiment. And (to repeat myself) just so, the world will burn.

This civilization will fall, broken, like all the ones before.

...it seems Pandora just can&#039;t resist opening that damn box.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked the question for years on Ace, whenever Malor brought up SSM: do your presumed 14th amendment rights trump my 2nd amendment rights?</p>
<p>The answer was always the same (because Gabe is a very smart guy): crickets.</p>
<p>&#8230;I finally gave up asking the question &#8230;he wasn&#8217;t going to fall into my &#8220;trap&#8221;, lol.</p>
<p>The only resolution to the question that is possible is to get the government out of the marriage business.</p>
<p>&#8230;which will not happen, <a href="http://neoneocon.com/2013/03/27/doma-unconstitutional/#comment-564991" rel="nofollow">as per my comments</a> in the thread <a href="http://neoneocon.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565543" rel="nofollow">sharpie so kindly mentioned above</a>.</p>
<p>I am no longer sanguine about the American Experiment. And (to repeat myself) just so, the world will burn.</p>
<p>This civilization will fall, broken, like all the ones before.</p>
<p>&#8230;it seems Pandora just can&#8217;t resist opening that damn box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beverly		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565975</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beverly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 06:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-565975</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zombie has done some reporting from the Belly of the Beast in San Francisco: http://preview.tinyurl.com/6cu28x

Pay attention to the landing page warning: the pages that follow are entirely NSFW.

Think about this: do you want your kids involved in this type of thing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zombie has done some reporting from the Belly of the Beast in San Francisco: <a href="http://preview.tinyurl.com/6cu28x" rel="nofollow ugc">http://preview.tinyurl.com/6cu28x</a></p>
<p>Pay attention to the landing page warning: the pages that follow are entirely NSFW.</p>
<p>Think about this: do you want your kids involved in this type of thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: M of Hollywood		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565731</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M of Hollywood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-565731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#039;s everywhere.  Gone are the days when I could say, &quot;Could people just keep their sexuality to themselves?&quot; or &quot;I don&#039;t care how people are persuaded to be, but I do care that people keep their sexuality private.&quot;  Now we lead with it.  

In a line today at the post office, a hip older man (my age) showed me  cartoon from a magazine or newspaper - I forget which.  Maybe the LATimes.  Anyway, it showed God in long robes on some clouds with some cherubic adults lounging around with one another regardless of sex.  God said, &quot;I think I&#039;ll see what happens if I make some of them this way.&quot;  Someone replied to God, &quot;Remember what happened when you did that with color?&quot;  

I didn&#039;t find it particularly funny, but the man in line did.  I kind of said so and he no longer really wanted to talk with me anymore.  I then said, &quot;Some post modernist should &#039;deconstruct&#039; that.  You know how they like to use the word &#039;deconstruct&#039;.&quot;  He looked at me quizzically.  I said, &quot;Well, the cartoon is obviously left-ish, and yet there&#039;s God in there and the left is not supposed to believe God made people that way--or any other way.  It&#039;s all evolution, just like color was, to adapt to the sun.&quot;   And then he said, unfunnily, &quot;Oh yes and we all came originally from Africa and were all black.&quot;  That was odd.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s everywhere.  Gone are the days when I could say, &#8220;Could people just keep their sexuality to themselves?&#8221; or &#8220;I don&#8217;t care how people are persuaded to be, but I do care that people keep their sexuality private.&#8221;  Now we lead with it.  </p>
<p>In a line today at the post office, a hip older man (my age) showed me  cartoon from a magazine or newspaper &#8211; I forget which.  Maybe the LATimes.  Anyway, it showed God in long robes on some clouds with some cherubic adults lounging around with one another regardless of sex.  God said, &#8220;I think I&#8217;ll see what happens if I make some of them this way.&#8221;  Someone replied to God, &#8220;Remember what happened when you did that with color?&#8221;  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t find it particularly funny, but the man in line did.  I kind of said so and he no longer really wanted to talk with me anymore.  I then said, &#8220;Some post modernist should &#8216;deconstruct&#8217; that.  You know how they like to use the word &#8216;deconstruct&#8217;.&#8221;  He looked at me quizzically.  I said, &#8220;Well, the cartoon is obviously left-ish, and yet there&#8217;s God in there and the left is not supposed to believe God made people that way&#8211;or any other way.  It&#8217;s all evolution, just like color was, to adapt to the sun.&#8221;   And then he said, unfunnily, &#8220;Oh yes and we all came originally from Africa and were all black.&#8221;  That was odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565617</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-565617</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[mizpants: ARGHHHH!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mizpants: ARGHHHH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565590</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-565590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We are no longer &quot;Slouching Towards Gomorrah&quot; (Rob&#039;t Bork). Is there any doubt we are there?

Gomorrah will look like it always does: Jails, repressions, takings of property, takings of the wrong kinds of liberties, oppression, poverty, joylessness, joblessness, forced labor, forced confessions, show trials and bad faith all around.

Relative to the America-that-once-was, it will be hell.

The only real hope is that there are consequences for the denial of reality and the opposition to good and good people. The society which does that will eventually die out in its own way. Gomorrah was not fiction; it is myth. &quot;Gomorrah&quot; is always the cause of its own inevitable destruction - the cost being so high however, so it is cold comfort. It did not need to be.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are no longer &#8220;Slouching Towards Gomorrah&#8221; (Rob&#8217;t Bork). Is there any doubt we are there?</p>
<p>Gomorrah will look like it always does: Jails, repressions, takings of property, takings of the wrong kinds of liberties, oppression, poverty, joylessness, joblessness, forced labor, forced confessions, show trials and bad faith all around.</p>
<p>Relative to the America-that-once-was, it will be hell.</p>
<p>The only real hope is that there are consequences for the denial of reality and the opposition to good and good people. The society which does that will eventually die out in its own way. Gomorrah was not fiction; it is myth. &#8220;Gomorrah&#8221; is always the cause of its own inevitable destruction &#8211; the cost being so high however, so it is cold comfort. It did not need to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sharpie		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sharpie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-565543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Integrity. What does it mean when it&#039;s gone. 

God&#039;s commandments, summed up in the ten commandments, are a whole. Destroy one and you will eventually see all destroyed. 

The roots of our culture accepting SSM are found in accepting fornication and adultery. The latter more in a legal than cultural sense. But once sex could be obtained outside marriage and that became a norm, marriage morphed into a different thing.

davisbr brought that point in his post on March 28th, 2013 at 5:18 pm where he characterizes the issue as a King v Church issue.

It is a King v Church issue, because the Church retains the integrity of the Commandments and hence the role marriage provides that if you want sex, you get married. 

The King enforces the new understanding of those without the limitations of Commandments. 

You can see, with something almost like beauty, how Obama&#039;s actions are &quot;scripted&quot; to provide a gov&#039;t which has rejected Commandments. 

The Word of God is a whole. King David expressed this frequently in his poetry. 

The Founders understood that if G-d is the source of our rights then he is the source of our responsibilities. We cannot, because of integrity, compromise and accept a hybrid law.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Integrity. What does it mean when it&#8217;s gone. </p>
<p>God&#8217;s commandments, summed up in the ten commandments, are a whole. Destroy one and you will eventually see all destroyed. </p>
<p>The roots of our culture accepting SSM are found in accepting fornication and adultery. The latter more in a legal than cultural sense. But once sex could be obtained outside marriage and that became a norm, marriage morphed into a different thing.</p>
<p>davisbr brought that point in his post on March 28th, 2013 at 5:18 pm where he characterizes the issue as a King v Church issue.</p>
<p>It is a King v Church issue, because the Church retains the integrity of the Commandments and hence the role marriage provides that if you want sex, you get married. </p>
<p>The King enforces the new understanding of those without the limitations of Commandments. </p>
<p>You can see, with something almost like beauty, how Obama&#8217;s actions are &#8220;scripted&#8221; to provide a gov&#8217;t which has rejected Commandments. </p>
<p>The Word of God is a whole. King David expressed this frequently in his poetry. </p>
<p>The Founders understood that if G-d is the source of our rights then he is the source of our responsibilities. We cannot, because of integrity, compromise and accept a hybrid law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mizpants		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565501</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mizpants]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-565501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry to be so late in the thread, but I&#039;m travelling and just looked in. Neo, you did the ASCRIBE thing again! Please correct.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to be so late in the thread, but I&#8217;m travelling and just looked in. Neo, you did the ASCRIBE thing again! Please correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SteveH		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565407</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-565407</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;&quot; But what is gained by “pushing the parameters of sex” in order to “radically reorder” the concept of reality?&quot;&quot;
DNW

 The whole of the leftist movement can perhaps be best described as a war on oppresive self restraint.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221; But what is gained by “pushing the parameters of sex” in order to “radically reorder” the concept of reality?&#8221;&#8221;<br />
DNW</p>
<p> The whole of the leftist movement can perhaps be best described as a war on oppresive self restraint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sharpie		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sharpie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 02:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-565147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s hard not to slip.

We&#039;re pretty much past where we can slip anymore.

Guns are taken away in Chicago and murder/crime/gang violence explodes. The citizen can&#039;t protect himself, the city won&#039;t enforce the guns laws against the criminals, and the city won&#039;t prosecute and seek justice for victims. If you wanted to create a brownshirt army, this is how you would do it. Meanwhile various gov&#039;t agencies amass ammunition. Gangs of black teens flash assualt whites as a hate crime and the Pres says one of them looks like his son if he had one. The economy supports the fraudulent, the crony, the lazy while the honest hardworking man is laughed at as a fool. The gay assault force savagely assails any who oppose their agenda and the gov&#039;t approves. 

Systems have their own times. People say, &quot;Aww, the crazy nut jobs have always been saying chicken little.&quot; But the long time of the warnings must be related to the system, whether it&#039;s predicting an earthquake or economic/political super crisis. 

The slipping time is about over. Reaping time comes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard not to slip.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re pretty much past where we can slip anymore.</p>
<p>Guns are taken away in Chicago and murder/crime/gang violence explodes. The citizen can&#8217;t protect himself, the city won&#8217;t enforce the guns laws against the criminals, and the city won&#8217;t prosecute and seek justice for victims. If you wanted to create a brownshirt army, this is how you would do it. Meanwhile various gov&#8217;t agencies amass ammunition. Gangs of black teens flash assualt whites as a hate crime and the Pres says one of them looks like his son if he had one. The economy supports the fraudulent, the crony, the lazy while the honest hardworking man is laughed at as a fool. The gay assault force savagely assails any who oppose their agenda and the gov&#8217;t approves. </p>
<p>Systems have their own times. People say, &#8220;Aww, the crazy nut jobs have always been saying chicken little.&#8221; But the long time of the warnings must be related to the system, whether it&#8217;s predicting an earthquake or economic/political super crisis. </p>
<p>The slipping time is about over. Reaping time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wry Mouth		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/28/the-ssm-slippery-slope/#comment-565136</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wry Mouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 02:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=26311#comment-565136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[the &quot;definition&quot; of marriage as a heterosexual relationship predates any tradition or society, or even history. why no one is making this argument in the courts baffles me. the best reasons for expanding the definition of marriage are not scientific or natural, but religious in nature. This is an odd irony, since all major faiths largely define marriage as heterosexual. But anytime a society wants to overturn the natural order, they must begin with supernatural arguments -- compassion, or mercy, or justice.

Weird.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the &#8220;definition&#8221; of marriage as a heterosexual relationship predates any tradition or society, or even history. why no one is making this argument in the courts baffles me. the best reasons for expanding the definition of marriage are not scientific or natural, but religious in nature. This is an odd irony, since all major faiths largely define marriage as heterosexual. But anytime a society wants to overturn the natural order, they must begin with supernatural arguments &#8212; compassion, or mercy, or justice.</p>
<p>Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
