<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bloomberg&#8217;s big drink ban&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: expat		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[expat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think certain TV programs (The View, eg) should be banned because they damage the ability to think. 

I still smoke, but I respect anti-smoking regulations. I do think that banning cigarettes outside is over the top. And I don&#039;t throw cigarette butts on the ground, nor do I throw used plastic bags in the ocean.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think certain TV programs (The View, eg) should be banned because they damage the ability to think. </p>
<p>I still smoke, but I respect anti-smoking regulations. I do think that banning cigarettes outside is over the top. And I don&#8217;t throw cigarette butts on the ground, nor do I throw used plastic bags in the ocean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549291</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Charles: that&#039;s in the post.  The judge&#039;s ruling was based on the fact that it was too arbitrary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles: that&#8217;s in the post.  The judge&#8217;s ruling was based on the fact that it was too arbitrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549267</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For whatever its worth . . .

As someone who is asthmatic - YES, second-hand smoke is a problem.  It is MY problem and smokers have no right to make their addiction cause my problem to be worse.  I don&#039;t need a study to detemine this.  My lack of breathing around smoke tells me all I need to know.

Concerning Neo&#039;s post.  From what I can tell it isn&#039;t that the judge was against Nanny Bloomberg; it was because it was too arbitrary.  One store can still sell the &quot;bad for you stuff&quot; while a store next door could not.  That was the reason the judge ruled against this.  But, manybe I misreading the other reports on this as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For whatever its worth . . .</p>
<p>As someone who is asthmatic &#8211; YES, second-hand smoke is a problem.  It is MY problem and smokers have no right to make their addiction cause my problem to be worse.  I don&#8217;t need a study to detemine this.  My lack of breathing around smoke tells me all I need to know.</p>
<p>Concerning Neo&#8217;s post.  From what I can tell it isn&#8217;t that the judge was against Nanny Bloomberg; it was because it was too arbitrary.  One store can still sell the &#8220;bad for you stuff&#8221; while a store next door could not.  That was the reason the judge ruled against this.  But, manybe I misreading the other reports on this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Surellin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549261</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Surellin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Drinking too much pop theoretically leads to obesity etc. and costs your fellow-citizens for supporting your health costs.  In short, ANYTHING you do that isn&#039;t the safest possible course is a cost on your fellows, risible and subject to regulation.  This is a corollary of &quot;The personal is the political&quot;, I suppose.  Me, I think that the personal needs the political like a fish needs a bicycle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drinking too much pop theoretically leads to obesity etc. and costs your fellow-citizens for supporting your health costs.  In short, ANYTHING you do that isn&#8217;t the safest possible course is a cost on your fellows, risible and subject to regulation.  This is a corollary of &#8220;The personal is the political&#8221;, I suppose.  Me, I think that the personal needs the political like a fish needs a bicycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree that smoking is noxious to many non-smokers, perhaps the majority, which would make it a very large group.

I am among them.  I hate cigarette smoke.  But I do think the smoking ban should be up to the restaurant owner, although I personally benefit from a blanket ban.

As far as the health consequences go, I also agree that for things like asthma and allergies and just general noxiousness, the negatives of second-hand smoke are very clear.  But the campaign against it was also based on supposedly strong evidence of very serious health problems like cancer and cardiac disease, and that turns out to have been somewhat more iffy and controversial.  That&#039;s what I was referring to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that smoking is noxious to many non-smokers, perhaps the majority, which would make it a very large group.</p>
<p>I am among them.  I hate cigarette smoke.  But I do think the smoking ban should be up to the restaurant owner, although I personally benefit from a blanket ban.</p>
<p>As far as the health consequences go, I also agree that for things like asthma and allergies and just general noxiousness, the negatives of second-hand smoke are very clear.  But the campaign against it was also based on supposedly strong evidence of very serious health problems like cancer and cardiac disease, and that turns out to have been somewhat more iffy and controversial.  That&#8217;s what I was referring to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549244</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Artfldgr: 

actually, you did get it wrong.

But that&#039;s alright.

I was merely talking about &lt;i&gt;the arguments used&lt;/i&gt; by those advocating the public smoking ban, and comparing it to &lt;i&gt;the arguments used&lt;/i&gt; by those advocating the large drink ban, and saying even on that level there&#039;s no comparison.

I well understand that there are motives behind the motives, and arguments behind the arguments, and agendas behind the agendas, and that it&#039;s all part of a larger picture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artfldgr: </p>
<p>actually, you did get it wrong.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s alright.</p>
<p>I was merely talking about <i>the arguments used</i> by those advocating the public smoking ban, and comparing it to <i>the arguments used</i> by those advocating the large drink ban, and saying even on that level there&#8217;s no comparison.</p>
<p>I well understand that there are motives behind the motives, and arguments behind the arguments, and agendas behind the agendas, and that it&#8217;s all part of a larger picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tesh		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549229</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know it&#039;s incidental, not &quot;hard data&quot;, but I&#039;m pretty sure that my time from birth to age 3 or so with smoking grandparents we visited often screwed up my lungs.  Of course, Mt. St. Helens didn&#039;t do me any favors, either.

Still, I don&#039;t advocate a statist solution.  I just avoid smokers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s incidental, not &#8220;hard data&#8221;, but I&#8217;m pretty sure that my time from birth to age 3 or so with smoking grandparents we visited often screwed up my lungs.  Of course, Mt. St. Helens didn&#8217;t do me any favors, either.</p>
<p>Still, I don&#8217;t advocate a statist solution.  I just avoid smokers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KLSmith		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549216</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KLSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For anyone that has wanted to quit smoking, but not been successfull ..... check out e-cigs. Nicotine without the noxious smoke and tar.
It&#039;s the tar that hurts your lungs, not the nicotine. The e-cigs emit water vapor that doesn&#039;t stink and hang in the air like smoke. I think they&#039;re a miracle and wish they&#039;d been available decades ago.
My kids are much happier when they come for a visit now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone that has wanted to quit smoking, but not been successfull &#8230;.. check out e-cigs. Nicotine without the noxious smoke and tar.<br />
It&#8217;s the tar that hurts your lungs, not the nicotine. The e-cigs emit water vapor that doesn&#8217;t stink and hang in the air like smoke. I think they&#8217;re a miracle and wish they&#8217;d been available decades ago.<br />
My kids are much happier when they come for a visit now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Micheal Doomberg		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549213</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Micheal Doomberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let me remind you narrow minded, short sighted naysayers: 
We conquered violent crime with strict gun ban laws, reduced the lung cancer rate of all restaurant goers, eliminated poverty and homelessness with rent control, and racism is unknown in NYC because we have hate crime legislation and strict anti-discrimination laws. 
  So I looked around and what did I see?  Another big problem-- Fat people. Everywhere I look, fat people.  You can&#039;t miss them.  You think that&#039;s not a problem for our city?   How about the wear and tear on city bus seats, the extra fuel to lug their big asses around everyday?  How about the extra space they take up on the subway and sidewalks?  You think that&#039;s free?  I&#039;ve got studies -- they show we could save a bunch of CO2 emissions if we could fit more people on every subway, taxi, and bus ride -- but how can we do that if I have a city full of lard asses taking up double the space?  
 You think that storm was a fluke?  I&#039;m telling you it was a warning -- if we don&#039;t reduce soda consumption and lose weight in this city, the risk of more super storms from unnecessary CO2 emissions caused by you fat asses is going to ruin us.  Then there&#039;s the added load on sewers and other utilities. Do I need to explain that too? Try and see the big picture for a change, I&#039;m not doing this job for my health.
 Obesity and global warming - these are not joking matters.  What if the UN relocates? How would that make us look?
 Now don&#039;t get me started on the earbuds - that&#039;s another problem in this city. How do I know?  My staff and even my wife has them stuck in their ears all the time, and they can&#039;t hear what I&#039;m saying half the time about popcorn and soda or other critical PSAs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me remind you narrow minded, short sighted naysayers:<br />
We conquered violent crime with strict gun ban laws, reduced the lung cancer rate of all restaurant goers, eliminated poverty and homelessness with rent control, and racism is unknown in NYC because we have hate crime legislation and strict anti-discrimination laws.<br />
  So I looked around and what did I see?  Another big problem&#8211; Fat people. Everywhere I look, fat people.  You can&#8217;t miss them.  You think that&#8217;s not a problem for our city?   How about the wear and tear on city bus seats, the extra fuel to lug their big asses around everyday?  How about the extra space they take up on the subway and sidewalks?  You think that&#8217;s free?  I&#8217;ve got studies &#8212; they show we could save a bunch of CO2 emissions if we could fit more people on every subway, taxi, and bus ride &#8212; but how can we do that if I have a city full of lard asses taking up double the space?<br />
 You think that storm was a fluke?  I&#8217;m telling you it was a warning &#8212; if we don&#8217;t reduce soda consumption and lose weight in this city, the risk of more super storms from unnecessary CO2 emissions caused by you fat asses is going to ruin us.  Then there&#8217;s the added load on sewers and other utilities. Do I need to explain that too? Try and see the big picture for a change, I&#8217;m not doing this job for my health.<br />
 Obesity and global warming &#8211; these are not joking matters.  What if the UN relocates? How would that make us look?<br />
 Now don&#8217;t get me started on the earbuds &#8211; that&#8217;s another problem in this city. How do I know?  My staff and even my wife has them stuck in their ears all the time, and they can&#8217;t hear what I&#8217;m saying half the time about popcorn and soda or other critical PSAs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2013/03/12/bloombergs-ban/#comment-549210</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=25888#comment-549210</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg: Government Probably Shouldn’t Force Exercise

that was the heading... 

and of course... we forget romania, japan, mao, korea, and on and on

ALL of them had mass exercise programs that people like bloomberg see and say... oh, how my orgasms would be so wonderful if i had millions exercising every morning against their will and i forced them. 

if you search youtube, you will find they scrubbed most of the examples of soviet communist mass exericise. but if you see google images, you can see what you tube doesnt want you to see... 

and you can see that the more google helps, the more its like some wacko who brings you waht you dont want. 

hi, i would like some ham and cheeze on white
here is your pizza
but i asked for ham and cheese on white
here is your article on white privelege
etc

so if you search for pyongyang exercise, you get the armstice... because they dont think you really want to know about exercise, but asked for exercise so you can find out about the coming nuclear war. 

(which by the way, we are unprepared for. as they prepare for a missle norks dont have, and do not prevent them from shipping to south america, and bringing it through one of the open border tunnesl that ship tonnes of cocain, meth, and other things. duh. not to mention a fishing trawler can send it up in a weather balloon.. and it would float over the US like the japanese firebombs launched from japan. they didnt set the forests on fire, but they did kill a family at a picnic... anucler version of this would do a lot more... and no way to stop it..  shoot it down, it goes off... )


i would suggest reading about what theya re copying. 

then you will know what they are doing
they are not original thinkers, they are incremental thinkers who copy an copy and copy. 

so its easy to see that they are, or have learned from, the soviets in the illusions of ruling vs good governance. 

one only has to actually read the history of the fertility problem, to see how their methods, exactly the same as now, creates situations that new similar methods could not undo... 

one only has to look to them to see them making all the stuff the left thinks they support and were about, illegal in their own country!!!!!!!!!!

why would they let the disease they planted come full around and infect them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloomberg: Government Probably Shouldn’t Force Exercise</p>
<p>that was the heading&#8230; </p>
<p>and of course&#8230; we forget romania, japan, mao, korea, and on and on</p>
<p>ALL of them had mass exercise programs that people like bloomberg see and say&#8230; oh, how my orgasms would be so wonderful if i had millions exercising every morning against their will and i forced them. </p>
<p>if you search youtube, you will find they scrubbed most of the examples of soviet communist mass exericise. but if you see google images, you can see what you tube doesnt want you to see&#8230; </p>
<p>and you can see that the more google helps, the more its like some wacko who brings you waht you dont want. </p>
<p>hi, i would like some ham and cheeze on white<br />
here is your pizza<br />
but i asked for ham and cheese on white<br />
here is your article on white privelege<br />
etc</p>
<p>so if you search for pyongyang exercise, you get the armstice&#8230; because they dont think you really want to know about exercise, but asked for exercise so you can find out about the coming nuclear war. </p>
<p>(which by the way, we are unprepared for. as they prepare for a missle norks dont have, and do not prevent them from shipping to south america, and bringing it through one of the open border tunnesl that ship tonnes of cocain, meth, and other things. duh. not to mention a fishing trawler can send it up in a weather balloon.. and it would float over the US like the japanese firebombs launched from japan. they didnt set the forests on fire, but they did kill a family at a picnic&#8230; anucler version of this would do a lot more&#8230; and no way to stop it..  shoot it down, it goes off&#8230; )</p>
<p>i would suggest reading about what theya re copying. </p>
<p>then you will know what they are doing<br />
they are not original thinkers, they are incremental thinkers who copy an copy and copy. </p>
<p>so its easy to see that they are, or have learned from, the soviets in the illusions of ruling vs good governance. </p>
<p>one only has to actually read the history of the fertility problem, to see how their methods, exactly the same as now, creates situations that new similar methods could not undo&#8230; </p>
<p>one only has to look to them to see them making all the stuff the left thinks they support and were about, illegal in their own country!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>why would they let the disease they planted come full around and infect them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
