Comments on: And in no surprise at all, Obama…

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:53:27 +0000

The entire Left in this country are traitors to the US Constitution they claim to honor and obey.

This is nothing special, and has never been for those paying attention. What’s one more traitor at the top of American power. We’ve had them since decades past, whether for Iraq or Somalia.

By: James

James — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:00:44 +0000

It is not for his past (Rogets” does not contain enough words for that) that I fear and despise, but the present and future in this creature. I cannot speak for all of us from that time, but for me this does not anger me so much as hardens and invigorates my opposition to these, well words are not sufficient.

By: Oldflyer

Oldflyer — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 06:32:43 +0000

As Pat says the generation that really knows and cares about Kerry’s abysmal actions in the Vietnam era were relatively few in number at best. He was always a poster boy for the Left.

Still, it tells us a lot about Obama that he would nominate this dishonest hack to such a pivotal and prestigious position.

It also tells us a lot about that bubbling cesspool, good old boy network, that passes as the United States Senate that he will undoubtedly be confirmed without serious dissent.

We are governed by trolls and ethically challenged dwarfs.

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 06:13:42 +0000

helenL: of course Kerry was chosen because he will be confirmed easily. But he was also chosen because he’s of the same mind as Obama on foreign policy, and because his appointment will stick it to conservatives and conservative vets.

These attributes of Kerry’s are not mutually exclusive. His nomination was a no-brainer for Obama, it does so many things for him at once. In fact, before Rice’s problems left the Secretary of State position open, Kerry was going to be Secretary of Defense. Obama is probably sorry he can’t clone him and have him in both positions, and kill two birds with one Kerry.

And I’ll defer to you as the authority on Mitch McConnell’s stiffy.

By: helenL

helenL — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 03:56:58 +0000

This is not difficult. Obama needs an confirmation, because someone needs to run State, and a confirmation fight-and-failure, as he would have gotten with Susan Rice, would be an international embarassment. Kerry will be confirmed, because Mitch McConnell gets a stiffy every time he thinks about Scott Brown winning his way back into the senate.

It has nothing to do with offending vets, or Hamas, or whatever fever dreams one imagines.

By: M J R

M J R — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 03:30:26 +0000

Pat, 10:27 pm — Yes, “^left^ in ignorance.”

By: M J R

M J R — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 03:29:04 +0000

George, 10:11 pm — OUCH! [heee heee]

By: Pat

Pat — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 03:27:46 +0000

The generations that understand John Kerry’s treachery are fading from the electorate, The generations coming up are left in ignorance. He is going to be a perfect secretary of state – for our enemies.

By: George

George — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 03:11:48 +0000

Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Barney Frank and Elizabeth Warren.

Add Gerry Studds and you’ve got a full house: three deuces and two queens.

By: Steve

Steve — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:21:12 +0000

Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Barney Frank and Elizabeth Warren. MA voters sure know how to pick them. Liars and buggers all.