<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Twas ever thus	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:39:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Codey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-474875</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Codey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-474875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most social conservatives, instead of wanting more control over sexual lives, are wanting LESS control: less government spending on promoting sexual behaviors; less funding of Planned Parenthood, which propagandizes in order to control the lives of young people; less acceptability of counselors in high schools circumventing parents by arranging abortions, less enforcement of politically correct attitudes about sex, less ridicule of the politically incorrect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most social conservatives, instead of wanting more control over sexual lives, are wanting LESS control: less government spending on promoting sexual behaviors; less funding of Planned Parenthood, which propagandizes in order to control the lives of young people; less acceptability of counselors in high schools circumventing parents by arranging abortions, less enforcement of politically correct attitudes about sex, less ridicule of the politically incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thomass		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-473887</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 23:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-473887</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[T Says: 

&quot;An excellent idea that hadn’t occurred to me. Perhaps more difficult than a simple hostile takeover because many of the media firms are owned by even larger corporations (ABC/Disney, NBC/Comcast)&quot;

It is but you also don&#039;t have to start with [expensive] TV. Talk radio is covered but how about a non leftist npr? Or even music stations with smart non leftist djs. All this is important... 

Same for newspapers... if they were not so biased left would the market be better for them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T Says: </p>
<p>&#8220;An excellent idea that hadn’t occurred to me. Perhaps more difficult than a simple hostile takeover because many of the media firms are owned by even larger corporations (ABC/Disney, NBC/Comcast)&#8221;</p>
<p>It is but you also don&#8217;t have to start with [expensive] TV. Talk radio is covered but how about a non leftist npr? Or even music stations with smart non leftist djs. All this is important&#8230; </p>
<p>Same for newspapers&#8230; if they were not so biased left would the market be better for them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thomass		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-473882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-473882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[yeah, it was an eye opener to listen to liberals at parties in the bay area open up about their admiration for China&#039;s system... you know, after a couple drinks..They went into details why so there was little chance to backtrack...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, it was an eye opener to listen to liberals at parties in the bay area open up about their admiration for China&#8217;s system&#8230; you know, after a couple drinks..They went into details why so there was little chance to backtrack&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: T		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-473675</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-473675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Geoffrey Britian @ 10:11,

&quot;The MSM’s Achilles heel is the susceptibility of its publicly held, parent companies to hostile (conservative) takeover, by wealthy conservative individuals and foundations who can easily purchase a controlling interest in those parent companies…&quot;

An excellent idea that hadn&#039;t occurred to me.  Perhaps more difficult than a simple hostile takeover because many of the media firms are owned by even larger corporations (ABC/Disney, NBC/Comcast) but not an obstacle that would stop a group of determined, creative and enterprising conservative billionaires.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoffrey Britian @ 10:11,</p>
<p>&#8220;The MSM’s Achilles heel is the susceptibility of its publicly held, parent companies to hostile (conservative) takeover, by wealthy conservative individuals and foundations who can easily purchase a controlling interest in those parent companies…&#8221;</p>
<p>An excellent idea that hadn&#8217;t occurred to me.  Perhaps more difficult than a simple hostile takeover because many of the media firms are owned by even larger corporations (ABC/Disney, NBC/Comcast) but not an obstacle that would stop a group of determined, creative and enterprising conservative billionaires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Musings from Brian J. Noggle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Teaching The Children Lessons of Daniel Webster and Rober Heinlein, Accidentally		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-473616</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Musings from Brian J. Noggle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Teaching The Children Lessons of Daniel Webster and Rober Heinlein, Accidentally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-473616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] offers some quotes about governance: There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] offers some quotes about governance: There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve D		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-473457</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 04:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-473457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;is I would bet that the majority of Obama voters today, and almost certainly the majority of Americans, would say that he’s describing conservatives in definition #1 and liberals in definition #2. But a great many conservatives (myself included) and perhaps a few others would say that it’s quite the opposite.&#039;

They are both right but their respective strategies to control us and the areas that they want to control us in, differ of course.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;is I would bet that the majority of Obama voters today, and almost certainly the majority of Americans, would say that he’s describing conservatives in definition #1 and liberals in definition #2. But a great many conservatives (myself included) and perhaps a few others would say that it’s quite the opposite.&#8217;</p>
<p>They are both right but their respective strategies to control us and the areas that they want to control us in, differ of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: davisbr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-473446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davisbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-473446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[^Well put, Geoff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^Well put, Geoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoffrey Britain		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-473434</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey Britain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-473434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s arguable that our Constitution was primarily constructed as a bulwark, against either the majority or an organized minority from gaining dictatorial powers. Whenever either a minority or majority effectively seeks dictatorial powers, it is certain that the leadership and a majority of its supporters seek to control others.

In its lust for power, the tactical &#039;end run&#039; around the Constitution that the left has used to subvert the Constitution is perhaps threefold; the MSM acting as the left&#039;s purveyor of propaganda, the growth and ever widening entitlement state, dependent upon ever larger deficit spending and judicial activism. 

Of the three, judicial activism is both the hardest to address in the short term and the easiest to neutralize in the long term. 

The MSM&#039;s Achilles heel is the susceptibility of its publicly held, parent companies to hostile (conservative) takeover, by wealthy conservative individuals and foundations who can easily purchase a controlling interest in those parent companies...

The only way to reign in the growth and expansion of entitlements is through a really tough balanced budget amendment. Such an amendment would force reductions in spending, eliminating the growth in deficits and would both curtail the growth of entitlements and in time, reduce the dependent class. 

Take away the ability of the left to use the financial leverage that deficit spending provides and a mortal blow is struck against the left. Eliminate its propaganda organ the MSM and the public will start to awaken. Both those circumstances will eventuate in less liberal judges being appointed and a concurrent reduction in judicial activism.

Neither of these proposed strategies will be easily accomplished and both will take time to achieve. 

There is however no other option available. To use a military metaphor; as at Normandy Beach, the &#039;pillboxes&#039; of deficit spending, (which permits the deepening and expansion of entitlements) and the pervasiveness of the MSM...must be taken, no matter what the cost.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s arguable that our Constitution was primarily constructed as a bulwark, against either the majority or an organized minority from gaining dictatorial powers. Whenever either a minority or majority effectively seeks dictatorial powers, it is certain that the leadership and a majority of its supporters seek to control others.</p>
<p>In its lust for power, the tactical &#8216;end run&#8217; around the Constitution that the left has used to subvert the Constitution is perhaps threefold; the MSM acting as the left&#8217;s purveyor of propaganda, the growth and ever widening entitlement state, dependent upon ever larger deficit spending and judicial activism. </p>
<p>Of the three, judicial activism is both the hardest to address in the short term and the easiest to neutralize in the long term. </p>
<p>The MSM&#8217;s Achilles heel is the susceptibility of its publicly held, parent companies to hostile (conservative) takeover, by wealthy conservative individuals and foundations who can easily purchase a controlling interest in those parent companies&#8230;</p>
<p>The only way to reign in the growth and expansion of entitlements is through a really tough balanced budget amendment. Such an amendment would force reductions in spending, eliminating the growth in deficits and would both curtail the growth of entitlements and in time, reduce the dependent class. </p>
<p>Take away the ability of the left to use the financial leverage that deficit spending provides and a mortal blow is struck against the left. Eliminate its propaganda organ the MSM and the public will start to awaken. Both those circumstances will eventuate in less liberal judges being appointed and a concurrent reduction in judicial activism.</p>
<p>Neither of these proposed strategies will be easily accomplished and both will take time to achieve. </p>
<p>There is however no other option available. To use a military metaphor; as at Normandy Beach, the &#8216;pillboxes&#8217; of deficit spending, (which permits the deepening and expansion of entitlements) and the pervasiveness of the MSM&#8230;must be taken, no matter what the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GoneWithTheWind		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-473426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoneWithTheWind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 02:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-473426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The 47% statement was true, we all know it.  If you are Liberal you deny it and castigate anyone who says it but they know it as well.  Romney was talking with people who know this country is bankrupt.  We have crossed an event horizon with our debt and our spending and now there is no going back.  We will all spiral out of control together into the abyss.   He was talking straight to people who he thought might be able to help him turn things around.  We cannot save ourselves (well, we could but the it goes against our human nature so we won&#039;t) but Romney really believed we can so he was being honest describing what he thought was the problem.   But none of this matters anymore.  50.54% of the voters wanted Obama and now we have him and now we all get to take this ride together.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 47% statement was true, we all know it.  If you are Liberal you deny it and castigate anyone who says it but they know it as well.  Romney was talking with people who know this country is bankrupt.  We have crossed an event horizon with our debt and our spending and now there is no going back.  We will all spiral out of control together into the abyss.   He was talking straight to people who he thought might be able to help him turn things around.  We cannot save ourselves (well, we could but the it goes against our human nature so we won&#8217;t) but Romney really believed we can so he was being honest describing what he thought was the problem.   But none of this matters anymore.  50.54% of the voters wanted Obama and now we have him and now we all get to take this ride together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: roc scssrs		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/12/07/twas-ever-thus/#comment-473314</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roc scssrs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=22590#comment-473314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just want to defend social cons a little more vigorously. They are definitely no. 2&#039;s. To most social cons, sexual mores are more common sense than government fiat. They are willing to use federal power whenever they can, I&#039;ll grant you that, but that&#039;s because they&#039;ve come to so fear and mistrust judicial activism. It becomes more a question of balance between the branches, rather than a desire for more central control.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to defend social cons a little more vigorously. They are definitely no. 2&#8217;s. To most social cons, sexual mores are more common sense than government fiat. They are willing to use federal power whenever they can, I&#8217;ll grant you that, but that&#8217;s because they&#8217;ve come to so fear and mistrust judicial activism. It becomes more a question of balance between the branches, rather than a desire for more central control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
