<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CBS could have proved that Obama refused to call Benghazi &#8220;terrorism&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:26:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: csimon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-451874</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[csimon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-451874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[parker, thanks.
I&#039;m afraid I got carried away and my post became more of a vent of frustrations building for long time.

Apologies to those who waded thru it.

Still I must say ditto to Neo&#039;s comment above:

&quot;parker: boy, do I hope you are correct.
I guess I am more cynical than you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>parker, thanks.<br />
I&#8217;m afraid I got carried away and my post became more of a vent of frustrations building for long time.</p>
<p>Apologies to those who waded thru it.</p>
<p>Still I must say ditto to Neo&#8217;s comment above:</p>
<p>&#8220;parker: boy, do I hope you are correct.<br />
I guess I am more cynical than you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam L.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-451822</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam L.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-451822</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why now?  Because it can be overlooked.   They can say they were being responsible journalists, but CBS is still the network of Dan Rather.

blert, I think not.  The  foreign press seems to LOVE Obama more than ours does.

I, too, am nervous.  But the pre-post-mortems on the Dem side are encouraging, and I heard Rush say that Stephanie Cutter is saying not to be discouraged by the early exit polling.  He also asked, How many discouraged/disappointed Democrats are out there, unhappy though unwilling to say so, who will not vote for Obama, or will vote for Romney?  Five or ten percent will make a landslide for Romney.

And did you know Romney is really a gypsy?  If you misspell his name Romany.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why now?  Because it can be overlooked.   They can say they were being responsible journalists, but CBS is still the network of Dan Rather.</p>
<p>blert, I think not.  The  foreign press seems to LOVE Obama more than ours does.</p>
<p>I, too, am nervous.  But the pre-post-mortems on the Dem side are encouraging, and I heard Rush say that Stephanie Cutter is saying not to be discouraged by the early exit polling.  He also asked, How many discouraged/disappointed Democrats are out there, unhappy though unwilling to say so, who will not vote for Obama, or will vote for Romney?  Five or ten percent will make a landslide for Romney.</p>
<p>And did you know Romney is really a gypsy?  If you misspell his name Romany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jack		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-451433</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-451433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BenghaziGATE will be the test for MSM. If they don&#039;t at least cover it they know that half the nation will never believe a word they say.

That probably has them tied in knots.

But we&#039;ll see ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BenghaziGATE will be the test for MSM. If they don&#8217;t at least cover it they know that half the nation will never believe a word they say.</p>
<p>That probably has them tied in knots.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;ll see &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-451422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-451422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Neo: &quot;Obama will never resign unless the Democrats turn on him and demand it. And they will not do so.&quot;

I, for one, would be extremely surprised if the Democrats ever turned on Obama, even after he is gone from the white house.  Turning on Obama would be a death sentence for the Democrats as that would alienate most black voters who are voting based upon race.  No one dares to  criticize Obama as that is automatically seen as &quot;racism.&quot;  Turning on Obama will be seen as being far worse - a lynching!

And that would end black support for the Democrats.  It doesn&#039;t mean they would start to vote Republican, most just might not vote.

(P.S.  and before folks start calling me a racist, I am not refering to ALL blacks, just the &quot;voting block&quot; that most poltical campaigns refer to.)

Further, regardless of the outcome of this election, I do think it is important that Benghazi not be &quot;swept under the rug.&quot;  We do need to find out what happened, what the failures were and who failed, and, most importantly, what we (as a nation) are going to do so that it doesn&#039;t happened again.  NO Americans should die in a US Embassy or consulate - ever!  And certainly not the US Ambassador.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neo: &#8220;Obama will never resign unless the Democrats turn on him and demand it. And they will not do so.&#8221;</p>
<p>I, for one, would be extremely surprised if the Democrats ever turned on Obama, even after he is gone from the white house.  Turning on Obama would be a death sentence for the Democrats as that would alienate most black voters who are voting based upon race.  No one dares to  criticize Obama as that is automatically seen as &#8220;racism.&#8221;  Turning on Obama will be seen as being far worse &#8211; a lynching!</p>
<p>And that would end black support for the Democrats.  It doesn&#8217;t mean they would start to vote Republican, most just might not vote.</p>
<p>(P.S.  and before folks start calling me a racist, I am not refering to ALL blacks, just the &#8220;voting block&#8221; that most poltical campaigns refer to.)</p>
<p>Further, regardless of the outcome of this election, I do think it is important that Benghazi not be &#8220;swept under the rug.&#8221;  We do need to find out what happened, what the failures were and who failed, and, most importantly, what we (as a nation) are going to do so that it doesn&#8217;t happened again.  NO Americans should die in a US Embassy or consulate &#8211; ever!  And certainly not the US Ambassador.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: parker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-450911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-450911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;.. or will there be barely a whimper.&quot;

It will be a tearing of hair and wails of anguish.  It will be a beating of heads against the bullet pock marked and mortar blasted walls of Benghazi.  This will not fade away into the darkness of progressive night.  The MSM can not put Humpty Obama together again.  Collectively, they have jumped the shark and shot the albatross. 

Ashes, ashes, they all fall down.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;.. or will there be barely a whimper.&#8221;</p>
<p>It will be a tearing of hair and wails of anguish.  It will be a beating of heads against the bullet pock marked and mortar blasted walls of Benghazi.  This will not fade away into the darkness of progressive night.  The MSM can not put Humpty Obama together again.  Collectively, they have jumped the shark and shot the albatross. </p>
<p>Ashes, ashes, they all fall down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kcom		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-450886</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kcom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 01:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-450886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And here&#039;s a question - how much grief will CBS get from the rest of the media and punditocracy about &quot;selective editing&quot;? Those pundits excoriated Andrew Breitbart and James O&#039;Keefe for similar journalistics sins, even when it wasn&#039;t true. In this case, when it&#039;s demonstrably true, will the crescendo of criticism rise to the same level, or will there be barely a whimper.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s a question &#8211; how much grief will CBS get from the rest of the media and punditocracy about &#8220;selective editing&#8221;? Those pundits excoriated Andrew Breitbart and James O&#8217;Keefe for similar journalistics sins, even when it wasn&#8217;t true. In this case, when it&#8217;s demonstrably true, will the crescendo of criticism rise to the same level, or will there be barely a whimper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gcotharn		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-450863</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gcotharn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 01:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-450863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Breitbart, weeks before the 2008 election (quoted from memory):
&lt;i&gt;at this point, if media had irrefutable proof that Obama was an agent of a foreign nation, such as Venezuela, they would not report it.&lt;/i&gt;

I thought Breitbart was being hyperbolic.  However, CBS News hiding, of Obama&#039;s interview remarks to Steve Kroft, is a decent parallel to what Breitbart said media would do: they would hide the evidence.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breitbart, weeks before the 2008 election (quoted from memory):<br />
<i>at this point, if media had irrefutable proof that Obama was an agent of a foreign nation, such as Venezuela, they would not report it.</i></p>
<p>I thought Breitbart was being hyperbolic.  However, CBS News hiding, of Obama&#8217;s interview remarks to Steve Kroft, is a decent parallel to what Breitbart said media would do: they would hide the evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-450849</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-450849</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i think many miss the logic of whats going on... 

socialists hate capitalists.. 

we have said that the press is for the left, and so logically what would that lead one to think as to their profit motive? ie. they have none, for them the press serves another purpose. 

and fox? fox is hated as they are more capitalistic which means they will make money on telling the truth and revealing alternative purpose to a monetary one. 

newspapers without a profit motive have no purpose other than propaganda (and minimal survival through providing good information on non political things).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think many miss the logic of whats going on&#8230; </p>
<p>socialists hate capitalists.. </p>
<p>we have said that the press is for the left, and so logically what would that lead one to think as to their profit motive? ie. they have none, for them the press serves another purpose. </p>
<p>and fox? fox is hated as they are more capitalistic which means they will make money on telling the truth and revealing alternative purpose to a monetary one. </p>
<p>newspapers without a profit motive have no purpose other than propaganda (and minimal survival through providing good information on non political things).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: parker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-450814</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-450814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[neo,

I understand your cynicism, many people feel the same way.  However, Benghazi is not Solyndra. Benghazi is not Obamacare.  Benghazi is not the Honduras-Zelaya affair.  Benghazi is not Chicago style dirty politics. 4 are dead, including an ambassador.  Benghazi and the lies after the fact are not going away if BHO squeaks by tomorrow. Team Obama have jumped the shark and shot the albatross. They are a ship of fools headed into the shallows of history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neo,</p>
<p>I understand your cynicism, many people feel the same way.  However, Benghazi is not Solyndra. Benghazi is not Obamacare.  Benghazi is not the Honduras-Zelaya affair.  Benghazi is not Chicago style dirty politics. 4 are dead, including an ambassador.  Benghazi and the lies after the fact are not going away if BHO squeaks by tomorrow. Team Obama have jumped the shark and shot the albatross. They are a ship of fools headed into the shallows of history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: parker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/11/05/cbs-could-have-proved-that-obama-refused-to-call-benghazi-terrorism/#comment-450798</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=21510#comment-450798</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[csimon,

Be of good cheer: http://tinyurl.com/bjsrvz7

I&#039;m not a Dick Morris fan but I agree with his assessment. 

I agree with your concerns about fraud in the electoral process.  It needs to be addressed in a serious manner.  But, election fraud will never be eliminated, it can only be limited.  Its an endless battle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>csimon,</p>
<p>Be of good cheer: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/bjsrvz7" rel="nofollow ugc">http://tinyurl.com/bjsrvz7</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a Dick Morris fan but I agree with his assessment. </p>
<p>I agree with your concerns about fraud in the electoral process.  It needs to be addressed in a serious manner.  But, election fraud will never be eliminated, it can only be limited.  Its an endless battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
