and yet, when you discuss whether piss christ is art, the conditioned cant get it… and cant even be machiavellian enough to imagine that their discussion and thinking is totally contrived as its contradictory and situanally derived and not absolute.

ie. that doesnt mean that such is not art, the problem is the selectivity the diktat it is so buy, and the lack of the freedom to react to it normally.

ie. if the outraged were allowed to be outraged, people might learn its not art, and so making it serves no purpose.

but since the christans are not allowed that, the disrspect is instutitionalk and protected, it serves the perpose of hegelian division where one group is pushed down, while the other is given privileges till they become punitive.

so feminists are now punitive, and the state is making gender based quotas for colleges or else they are goint to take away the grants. 66% is not enough…

christians and jews in the second Shoa II are held down, while islam and atheism is allowed their violence.. till they become real oppressors, which the prior were not in any recent era… (when was the last auto de fe?)

gays and heterosexuals
blacks/spanish and whites/Chinese

its the same process in each case, and we are too stupid and ignorant to read about it, note it, and then dismantle it.

so how can the end be anything else than whats coming if we cant even do that?

it boggles the mind that they describe it out in the open, self proclaim their affiliation and goals, and then all that is ignored as their conditioned followers react according to their conditioning… and not reason…

make a movie to inform people about something, and murder and mayhem as that is disresepectful and not art.

to the point where the left is saying to prosecute the movie makers for the deaths they caused. so obviously they think its not art.

load up a jar, put a cross in it, urinate briskly, put it on a stand, make a nice label..

and that IS art…

we even discussed it…

and now i wonder, do we see how we have normalized a level of disrespect for others by making it art?

why is piss christ art, and the cartoon as to mohamed not art?

because the state dictates that, and so your a deviant if you dant telll the difference. (so its just easier to obey rather than request that the whole be cogent and consistent, eh?)

how is this different from nazi art over jews and favoring the mullah and africans? (african blacks served i the waffen ss)

our failure to understand this and to be so insensitive in general, has creatred the fertile situation where its easy to create such things by just leting us be offensive selectively…

put a cross

why?

a deli run by an islamic, sells alcohol, and pornography…

why?

to an outsider one is following their faith, and the other isn’t… but that’s not true…

the first is following their faith and that faith has them close rather than contribute to the harm of others (as they believe).

the second, as explained to me by a bodega owner of a deli that the 9/11 terrorists passed through (in queens near the mosque they arrested some others)…

he explained that he does not drink, nor does he look at the magazines. but he is fighting for islam by NOT protecting his customers.

ie. by promoting what is bad to his enemies, he gets to hurt them while they think he is making them happy.

you know. kind of like feminists teaching women to be sluts then claiming that the resultant behavior and social outcome is not their fault, but they shouold attack the society for trying to prevent them from being harmed!!!!

ie. destroy the enemy by changing their morals and giving the very bad advice and things described as good and liberating.

why wouldn’t your enemy sell you poison (mercury bulbs, pornography, sex without love, etc)?

the question sounds funny?

so we understand that your enemy would do that.. so the problem lies in our ablity to be allowed to say – that’s an enemy.

whether its islam, or feminists, we are not allowed to define who the enemy is… are we?

so both are free to cause lots of misery and be thanked for it. a position that subclinical sadistic sociopaths love…

Just Bellam

The ones in it for the long run are the Chinese.

You want to notice someone sitting at the sidelines waiting for the two fighting forces to beat each other up sufficient to allow them to take over the whole shebang… that would be the Chinese.

Kinda like the Romulans… In The Pale Moonlight — someone needs to do something to kick the Chinese in the ass.

We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.

Yeah, I’m sure, had there been Christian actions to, say, ransack the museums that showed “Piss Christ” or “Virgin Mary in Elephant Dung”, that he would have decried those awful artists for being so disrespectful, and been “understanding” of the Christians acting as they did.

Ah-hun. Yeah.

Not any more than we all are and want to be free. I just remember a scene and google or youtube it. Everyone can do the same. Just start and see how easy it is. You will soon develop a “find” strategy.

More than that, however, is passion. Why bother? If that answer is no, then there will be no search. But if that answer is yes, then the search will begin.

And you will live. You will thrive. You will fight. You will tea party.

Parker, you got it exactly right. They will try to outlast us. Look how far they have come in eleven years. Are we winning? Only a fool thinks so.

First, we have to acknowledge that their goal is to convert, enslave , or kill all infidels.
Second, we have to tell them we know what they are up to.
Third, we have to tell them that we are a tolerant nation and want to live in peace with all nations.
Fourth, we have to tell them that we will not tolerate attacks on our people anywhere in the world and be ready to back that up with swift, massive retaliation.
Fifth, we have to continually tell Muslims who claim to be moderates that their only protection is to shun the radicals who are carrying out violence and jihad. When they allow the radicals to shelter in their midst, we will not be responsible for any collateral damage. When the moderates are more afraid of us than they are of the radicals, maybe Islam will change.
Sixth, we have to refuse to tie our troops’ hands behind their backs when they are given combat missions.

An old Marine friend sent me an e-mail detailing how our operations in Afghanistan have been co-opted by the lawyers. Every year the restrictions on our trigger pullers have become more onerous, which the enemy uses to his advantage. The legal obstacles that were placed in the path of the Seals who were tasked with taking out bin Laden required ridiculous numbers of power point briefings and assurances that all the t’s crossed and i’s dotted before the plans were accepted. I understand a lot of this is covered in the book, “NO EASY DAY.”

To risk our warriors lives in such ridiculous ways serves no useful purpose except to assuage the PC pols and pundits. Is there any reason why we have to stand in long lines and have our body cavities checked at airports except that we have failed to deal with the threat in any meaningful way. When we no longer fear suicide bombers then I will say we are winning. We have to stand up for freedom!

I do not understand our reluctance to stomp down hard on our enemies. And anyone who doubts radical Islamists are not in it for the long run and intend to bring down the West is clueless.

Isn’t it time to discuss Harry Brown before our next cocktail.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-beKCnOQQ1Y