<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Romney&#8217;s quiet first	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:59:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sara		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, I cannot speak at all about who is influential or not regarding Evangelicals.  My opinion comes from those I&#039;ve known over the years, those I see commenting publicly, those I&#039;ve dealt with who believe they are the only &quot;true&quot; conservatives, etc. 

As I said, I grew up in the same area as Santorum. Back then (in the dark ages) it was Catholics and Southern Baptists who were considered weird and lesser in the eyes of good mainline Protestants. I was raised a Presbyterian. After college and marriage, I was unaffiliated with any church, as they all seemed wrong and had to do more with the rules of men than of any true faith in God or Christ. I had spent a good many years in studying religious history and researching the God concept. I later decided that the LDS church had it as right as it was going to get, short of converting to Judiasm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I cannot speak at all about who is influential or not regarding Evangelicals.  My opinion comes from those I&#8217;ve known over the years, those I see commenting publicly, those I&#8217;ve dealt with who believe they are the only &#8220;true&#8221; conservatives, etc. </p>
<p>As I said, I grew up in the same area as Santorum. Back then (in the dark ages) it was Catholics and Southern Baptists who were considered weird and lesser in the eyes of good mainline Protestants. I was raised a Presbyterian. After college and marriage, I was unaffiliated with any church, as they all seemed wrong and had to do more with the rules of men than of any true faith in God or Christ. I had spent a good many years in studying religious history and researching the God concept. I later decided that the LDS church had it as right as it was going to get, short of converting to Judiasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gcotharn		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gcotharn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[even though I AM a random foolish spouter offer. Heh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even though I AM a random foolish spouter offer. Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gcotharn		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347070</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gcotharn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sara, 

Did you read the false Christ thing from an influential Evangelical? B/c I have not heard anything like that from anyone who has a significant following. 

If we disagree, where do we disagree? Is it your contention that conservative Evangelicals are going to choose Barack over Mitt?  are going to choose Rev. Wright and &quot;Goddamn America&quot;?  are going to choose Euro Socialism over capitalism?  I don&#039;t think you think that. I think you get pissed off over anecdotal evidence of random non influential Evangelicals who spout off on the internet. At least, that is my suspicion. I suspect you and I are relatively sympatico.  Random foolish spouter offers kinda piss me off, also.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara, </p>
<p>Did you read the false Christ thing from an influential Evangelical? B/c I have not heard anything like that from anyone who has a significant following. </p>
<p>If we disagree, where do we disagree? Is it your contention that conservative Evangelicals are going to choose Barack over Mitt?  are going to choose Rev. Wright and &#8220;Goddamn America&#8221;?  are going to choose Euro Socialism over capitalism?  I don&#8217;t think you think that. I think you get pissed off over anecdotal evidence of random non influential Evangelicals who spout off on the internet. At least, that is my suspicion. I suspect you and I are relatively sympatico.  Random foolish spouter offers kinda piss me off, also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sara		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[gcotharn: Sorry if I don&#039;t entirely agree with you. In fact, not 2 minutes ago, I just read how Romney worships a false Christ and that asking a &quot;Christian&quot; to vote for him would be akin to asking Jesus to pick one, Stalin or Hitler. 

I have absolutely nothing against Evangelicals or anyone else who lives a good life. I get out of sorts, not with American religions, but with any religion based on the Council of Nicene, which came 300+ years after Christ and was a bunch of old men deciding how the rest of humanity should worship Christ. I think it is all BS. I much prefer to go back to the early 1st century and to the teachings of the Jews of Jesus time and understanding. But that is just me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gcotharn: Sorry if I don&#8217;t entirely agree with you. In fact, not 2 minutes ago, I just read how Romney worships a false Christ and that asking a &#8220;Christian&#8221; to vote for him would be akin to asking Jesus to pick one, Stalin or Hitler. </p>
<p>I have absolutely nothing against Evangelicals or anyone else who lives a good life. I get out of sorts, not with American religions, but with any religion based on the Council of Nicene, which came 300+ years after Christ and was a bunch of old men deciding how the rest of humanity should worship Christ. I think it is all BS. I much prefer to go back to the early 1st century and to the teachings of the Jews of Jesus time and understanding. But that is just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J.J. formerly Jimmy J.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.J. formerly Jimmy J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In 1954, I lived in Salt Lake City for a year. Salt Lake was becoming less Mormon as non-Mormons moved there  for jobs.  My experience with Mormons during  that time ran the gamut from my ultra-strict Mormon cousin to the &quot;Jack- Mormon&quot; lady from whom I rented my living quarters.  My thought: Gee, some are ultra  religious and some are barely religious, with everything  in between.  The main thing I  noticed back in those days was that the church took care of their own. Their safety net for church members was substantial, but those who could work were required to do something, even  if it was just sweeping sidewalks in Salt  Lake.  That example of charity coupled with encouraging the work ethic has informed much of what I believe about giving those who are down a hand up, not a hand out.

Anyway, Mormons are generally decent people, they learn self reliance in the church, they encourage hard work, and they strive for sobriety. Romney&#039;s religion is not an issue for me, and  I wish all conservatives felt  the same.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1954, I lived in Salt Lake City for a year. Salt Lake was becoming less Mormon as non-Mormons moved there  for jobs.  My experience with Mormons during  that time ran the gamut from my ultra-strict Mormon cousin to the &#8220;Jack- Mormon&#8221; lady from whom I rented my living quarters.  My thought: Gee, some are ultra  religious and some are barely religious, with everything  in between.  The main thing I  noticed back in those days was that the church took care of their own. Their safety net for church members was substantial, but those who could work were required to do something, even  if it was just sweeping sidewalks in Salt  Lake.  That example of charity coupled with encouraging the work ethic has informed much of what I believe about giving those who are down a hand up, not a hand out.</p>
<p>Anyway, Mormons are generally decent people, they learn self reliance in the church, they encourage hard work, and they strive for sobriety. Romney&#8217;s religion is not an issue for me, and  I wish all conservatives felt  the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gcotharn		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gcotharn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sara #2,

I do not remember Santorum playing a religion card vis a vis LDS vs Catholics. I do remember Santorum leaping into the fray on numerous social issues. However, Santorum&#039;s leaps were, possibly, consistently in alignment with LDS beliefs vis a vis those very same social issues. 

Re your remarks which indicate that you are, to some extent, fed up with a number of Evangelical Christians, I invite you to factor in these points of view: 

- given the large numbers of Evangelicals in America: as a group, we could be, were we so inclined, much bigger ass@#$%&#038;^ than we already are. We&#039;ve got numbers, funding, and political power.  If we wanted, we could ramp up the oppressive aspects of our behavior. 

- given our large numbers, OF COURSE there will be large numbers of us who are less graceful human beings than we could be.

- Jesus said: &quot;I came not to call the righteous, but sinners.&quot;  Christian pastors consistently say that those of us who are attracted to Christianity are those of us who realize just how depraved and in need we are.  When Pastors look upon their congregations, they see very flawed and very humanly fallible persons.  We in the congregation came to Christianity for a reason. We were not wonderful persons, and still are not wonderful persons. So, we are, from time to time, going to do some unwonderful things. B/c that is who we are.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara #2,</p>
<p>I do not remember Santorum playing a religion card vis a vis LDS vs Catholics. I do remember Santorum leaping into the fray on numerous social issues. However, Santorum&#8217;s leaps were, possibly, consistently in alignment with LDS beliefs vis a vis those very same social issues. </p>
<p>Re your remarks which indicate that you are, to some extent, fed up with a number of Evangelical Christians, I invite you to factor in these points of view: </p>
<p>&#8211; given the large numbers of Evangelicals in America: as a group, we could be, were we so inclined, much bigger ass@#$%&amp;^ than we already are. We&#8217;ve got numbers, funding, and political power.  If we wanted, we could ramp up the oppressive aspects of our behavior. </p>
<p>&#8211; given our large numbers, OF COURSE there will be large numbers of us who are less graceful human beings than we could be.</p>
<p>&#8211; Jesus said: &#8220;I came not to call the righteous, but sinners.&#8221;  Christian pastors consistently say that those of us who are attracted to Christianity are those of us who realize just how depraved and in need we are.  When Pastors look upon their congregations, they see very flawed and very humanly fallible persons.  We in the congregation came to Christianity for a reason. We were not wonderful persons, and still are not wonderful persons. So, we are, from time to time, going to do some unwonderful things. B/c that is who we are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gcotharn		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gcotharn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sara,
to my knowledge, the only influential Evangelical who  brought Romney&#039;s religion into play in the primary was Pastor Robert Jeffries of First Baptist Church of Dallas.  He made thoughtful remarks, with which I disagreed, Also, his remarks, naturally, were not reported inside their full thoughtful context. After the effective end of the primary, Pastor Jeffries publicly endorsed Romney.  

After the drop outs of Bachmann, Perry, and Cain, and after Gringrich victory in South Carolina, a  group of influential Evangelical leaders met in Texas, and announced their support of Santorum. But, they made no mention of religion or LDS as a factor in their support of Santorum.  It was an issues thing. 

So, on a national level, influential conservative Evangelicals ARE going to shut up and vote for Romney; already have shut up, already either explicitly or implicitly support Romney.  Your desire will come true. If you hear an influential Evangelical criticizing LDS as a reason to oppose Romney, that Evangelical is a Democrat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara,<br />
to my knowledge, the only influential Evangelical who  brought Romney&#8217;s religion into play in the primary was Pastor Robert Jeffries of First Baptist Church of Dallas.  He made thoughtful remarks, with which I disagreed, Also, his remarks, naturally, were not reported inside their full thoughtful context. After the effective end of the primary, Pastor Jeffries publicly endorsed Romney.  </p>
<p>After the drop outs of Bachmann, Perry, and Cain, and after Gringrich victory in South Carolina, a  group of influential Evangelical leaders met in Texas, and announced their support of Santorum. But, they made no mention of religion or LDS as a factor in their support of Santorum.  It was an issues thing. </p>
<p>So, on a national level, influential conservative Evangelicals ARE going to shut up and vote for Romney; already have shut up, already either explicitly or implicitly support Romney.  Your desire will come true. If you hear an influential Evangelical criticizing LDS as a reason to oppose Romney, that Evangelical is a Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sara		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Mitt is going to win the election, and it will be “those Evangelical bigots” who put him over the top.&lt;/i&gt;

I hope you don&#039;t think that I think all Evangelicals are bigots. I most certainly do not. But, I do think that there are many Evangelical pastors who preach what I would call bigotry and many who don&#039;t question what they are being taught because it comes from the pulpit. LDS have been one of THE most persecuted groups in America, if you look at their history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Mitt is going to win the election, and it will be “those Evangelical bigots” who put him over the top.</i></p>
<p>I hope you don&#8217;t think that I think all Evangelicals are bigots. I most certainly do not. But, I do think that there are many Evangelical pastors who preach what I would call bigotry and many who don&#8217;t question what they are being taught because it comes from the pulpit. LDS have been one of THE most persecuted groups in America, if you look at their history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SteveH		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347037</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obama will do more to heal the rift between Mormons and evangelicals than anyone up to this point in history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama will do more to heal the rift between Mormons and evangelicals than anyone up to this point in history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sara		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/04/23/romneys-quiet-first/#comment-347033</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=15827#comment-347033</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[gcotharn: I think it will be great, I just wish they&#039;d shut up now and leave Mitt&#039;s religion out of it. He is a good man, an honest man, a wonderful family man, and very smart and savvy. How he worships shouldn&#039;t even come into play on any level. I still can&#039;t understand why they would want someone like Santorum in, a man with some very &quot;out there&quot; ideas, over Mitt. 

It was even weirder to me about Santorum as I grew up in the same area as he did and it was Catholics who were considered heathens and idol worshipers and who often faced discrimination. For him to play the religion card with Romney was bigotry, IMHO. It just made no sense to me at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gcotharn: I think it will be great, I just wish they&#8217;d shut up now and leave Mitt&#8217;s religion out of it. He is a good man, an honest man, a wonderful family man, and very smart and savvy. How he worships shouldn&#8217;t even come into play on any level. I still can&#8217;t understand why they would want someone like Santorum in, a man with some very &#8220;out there&#8221; ideas, over Mitt. </p>
<p>It was even weirder to me about Santorum as I grew up in the same area as he did and it was Catholics who were considered heathens and idol worshipers and who often faced discrimination. For him to play the religion card with Romney was bigotry, IMHO. It just made no sense to me at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
