Here is my webpage … lacrosse goalie

She’s pre-running for office. We’ll know for what when she announces.

Parker,

I agree with what you wrote.

This can be a teaching moment for people or a prelude to a ramp up by youth in violence.

I had read the Conservative Treehouse reporting, and I second your opinion: incredible reporting. That level of reporting was done for no pay, while paid reporters can’t be bothered to do more than regurgitate “He said, she said” type of quotes (or Al Sharpton quotes).

A Conservative Treehouse scoop (supported by reporting hustle and copious documentation) is that the civil rights lawyer, Benjamin Crump, lied about what the “girlfriend” knows. First, she was not Trayvon’s girlfriend, but actually dates someone else. Second, she did not speak to Trayvon for 400 minutes on the day of the incident. Third, she doesn’t know any more than this: Trayvon was “scared” b/c someone was following him. And that is it: she does not know ANYTHING ELSE which is relevant. NOTHING.

The civil rights lawyer implied that she knew more, and the civil rights lawyer lied about her relationship to and feelings for Trayvon, and the civil rights lawyer lied about why she did not attend the funeral or the viewing — alleged reason: so emotionally distraught that she was hospitalized. A complete lie. In fact, the girl tweeted to her friends all through the timeline of Trayvon’s funeral and viewing. Her numerous tweets show no indication of either emotional distress or hospitalization.

Why would the civil rights lawyer, Mr. Crump, lie? Speculation: he needed an arrest in order to file a civil suit. He doesn’t need a criminal conviction. He needs an arrest to file a civil suit which will be decided upon “preponderance of evidence.” Therefore, Mr. Crump lied about the “girlfriend” in order to create public outcry in order to create pressure for an arrest.

The “girlfriend” will never appear in court. Ever. She knows nothing of relevance. If she appears in court, then Mr. Crump’s public lies about her will be exposed. The girlfriend will never be submitted questioning. Ever.

This case is an incredible frame up. Mr. Zimmerman needs to hire his own civil rights lawyer and sue Mr. Crump, along with Mr. Sharpton, and along with various big media organizations and big media personalities. Mr. Zimmerman has an actual case: Mr. Zimmerman has ACTUALLY been wronged.

Meanwhile, Trayvon Martin’s body rests in a grave. And, now, the same promulgators of the culture of racial victimhood which contributed to Trayvon taking offense at being profiled … is picking over his carcass for power and profit. Disgusting.

Profiled. Trayvon Martin thought he was being racially profiled. Anger at being “racially profiled” was highly likely to have been a major factor in Trayvon’s decision to attack Zimmerman. Irony: at Zimmerman’s bond hearing, the state alleged that Zimmerman profiled Trayvon. The state didn’t have the guts to overtly allege “racial” profiling. Instead, they merely implied it. Thus, the same culture which encouraged Trayvon to be angry over racial profiling … is now the same culture which, in weaselly fashion, alleges that Zimmerman racially profiled.

I cannot decide if this case is more ironic or more disgusting. The culture of racial victimhood sparked Trayvon’s death, and now uses his death to claim vindication. Sickifying. They do not care: they are working for their self-flattering virtuous cause.

Update #9

Update #10 (Part 1)

Update #10 (Part 2)

Update #11

These articles are chock full of photos, videos, maps, timelines, and links, links, and more links.

There is so much material here that you will need to pack a lunch before reading, if not an overnight bag. But just skimming them, as I did, is very enlightening.

not much of a case to make if you pay attention to what they say among themselves and write for each other (the playbooks)..

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” — Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in “A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind”, by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5

As I have only seen defendants before a jury, what you are saying makes sense now.

Thanks!

I quite agree. The myth they spin is that there WAS a time when the media was mostly unbiased and truly reported the facts. Such a world, never existed, but was assumed because, as you accurately point out, very few had either the access to information or the broadcast ability to enable them to challenge the narrative. As you point out, see how they savaged Whittaker Chambers and sanctified Walter Duranty.