<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gingrich won&#8217;t debate Obama if the media sets the terms	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bronwyn Duwe		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-312881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bronwyn Duwe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-312881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The absurd notion that liberals promote a &quot;culture of victimizat­ion&quot; is one of the clearest examples of right-wing projection I&#039;ve ever witnessed. The ENTIRE conservati­ve movement is built on feeling sorry for themselves and claiming they&#039;re the victims of nefarious forces (the &quot;liberal media&quot;, &quot;liberal academia&quot;, &quot;liberal teacher&#039;s unions&quot;, &quot;liberal PC culture&quot;, &quot;liberal secularist­s&quot;, the &quot;liberal ACLU, etc.) Noticing a pattern here? The left is far, far weaker than the right in America, and yet, they&#039;ve built up this all-purpos­e liberal bogeyman / straw-man to blame all its failures on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The absurd notion that liberals promote a &#8220;culture of victimizat­ion&#8221; is one of the clearest examples of right-wing projection I&#8217;ve ever witnessed. The ENTIRE conservati­ve movement is built on feeling sorry for themselves and claiming they&#8217;re the victims of nefarious forces (the &#8220;liberal media&#8221;, &#8220;liberal academia&#8221;, &#8220;liberal teacher&#8217;s unions&#8221;, &#8220;liberal PC culture&#8221;, &#8220;liberal secularist­s&#8221;, the &#8220;liberal ACLU, etc.) Noticing a pattern here? The left is far, far weaker than the right in America, and yet, they&#8217;ve built up this all-purpos­e liberal bogeyman / straw-man to blame all its failures on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: davisbr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-312078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davisbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-312078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aargh: must.close.tags.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aargh: must.close.tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: davisbr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-312076</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davisbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-312076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;rickl&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; Says: February 1st, 2012 at 5:29 am 
&lt;em&gt;Utterly off-topic, but I found this while I was looking for the Little Big Man clip:
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIMGV5vtd4&#038;feature&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors&lt;/a&gt;
 
I for one welcome our new nano quadrotor overlords.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah &quot;OT&quot; ...but fascinating. And maybe quad-rotor overlords isn&#039;t far off the mark.

The video wasn&#039;t clear whether that drone flight was either purely software (robotic) or remote+software controlled. And I wonder what the range is? 1 klick? 5 klicks?

Anyways ...the weaponization potential there is, umm, well: just think about it. Especially at the battlefield level.

The cost of those things would be miniscule (even compared to the current drones). Targeting should be an utter no brainer (well, general line-of-sight, at least).

Even at this point of development, just add some minor but sufficient amout of C4 and a detonator. Maybe a small &#039;cam. Send a flight of these (enough so they can&#039;t all be shot down ...and targeting the things would be hard, regardless, due to their size) over an enemy troops know-but-inaccessible-to-fire position (even one that is otherwise pretty well shielded, say behind a revetment or plain ol&#039; wall). Upon arrival, reform the flight pattern overhead to some given explosion density factor ...and detonate.

Bad guy(s) all gone (or incapacitated to some degree ...and casualties are almost always more of a liability to an enemy force than fatalities).

Platoon level guided munitions on battlefields at a cost barely more than bullets. With an accuracy rate (kill rate) that reaches expert sniper level.

Mosquito bomb drones.

Oh my.

Doesn&#039;t this is sound almost immediately feasible?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>rickl</strong><strong> Says: February 1st, 2012 at 5:29 am<br />
<em>Utterly off-topic, but I found this while I was looking for the Little Big Man clip:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIMGV5vtd4&amp;feature" rel="nofollow">A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors</a></p>
<p>I for one welcome our new nano quadrotor overlords.</em></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah &#8220;OT&#8221; &#8230;but fascinating. And maybe quad-rotor overlords isn&#8217;t far off the mark.</p>
<p>The video wasn&#8217;t clear whether that drone flight was either purely software (robotic) or remote+software controlled. And I wonder what the range is? 1 klick? 5 klicks?</p>
<p>Anyways &#8230;the weaponization potential there is, umm, well: just think about it. Especially at the battlefield level.</p>
<p>The cost of those things would be miniscule (even compared to the current drones). Targeting should be an utter no brainer (well, general line-of-sight, at least).</p>
<p>Even at this point of development, just add some minor but sufficient amout of C4 and a detonator. Maybe a small &#8216;cam. Send a flight of these (enough so they can&#8217;t all be shot down &#8230;and targeting the things would be hard, regardless, due to their size) over an enemy troops know-but-inaccessible-to-fire position (even one that is otherwise pretty well shielded, say behind a revetment or plain ol&#8217; wall). Upon arrival, reform the flight pattern overhead to some given explosion density factor &#8230;and detonate.</p>
<p>Bad guy(s) all gone (or incapacitated to some degree &#8230;and casualties are almost always more of a liability to an enemy force than fatalities).</p>
<p>Platoon level guided munitions on battlefields at a cost barely more than bullets. With an accuracy rate (kill rate) that reaches expert sniper level.</p>
<p>Mosquito bomb drones.</p>
<p>Oh my.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t this is sound almost immediately feasible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary Wilbur		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-312042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Wilbur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-312042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a piece of Gingrich&#039;s enormous ego. He isn&#039;t going to get the chance to debate Obama.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a piece of Gingrich&#8217;s enormous ego. He isn&#8217;t going to get the chance to debate Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CZ		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-312032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-312032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From the looks of things Noot will never get his chance to go one-on-one with B.O. Not that I wouldn&#039;t like to see it.

OMG! 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the looks of things Noot will never get his chance to go one-on-one with B.O. Not that I wouldn&#8217;t like to see it.</p>
<p>OMG! 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rickl		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-311998</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-311998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The comments are great.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments are great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rickl		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-311997</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-311997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Utterly off-topic, but I found this while I was looking for the Little Big Man clip:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIMGV5vtd4&#038;feature=g-logo&#038;context=G24b6542FOAAAAAAAAAA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors&lt;/a&gt;

I for one welcome our new nano quadrotor overlords.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utterly off-topic, but I found this while I was looking for the Little Big Man clip:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIMGV5vtd4&amp;feature=g-logo&amp;context=G24b6542FOAAAAAAAAAA" rel="nofollow">A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors</a></p>
<p>I for one welcome our new nano quadrotor overlords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rickl		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-311996</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-311996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Baklava:  
Cutting government by 50% makes me a liberal?

The problem is that the rate of growth of debt and debt service is outpacing the rate of growth of GDP.  

There is no way we can grow our way out of this.  The math don&#039;t work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baklava:<br />
Cutting government by 50% makes me a liberal?</p>
<p>The problem is that the rate of growth of debt and debt service is outpacing the rate of growth of GDP.  </p>
<p>There is no way we can grow our way out of this.  The math don&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rickl		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-311991</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-311991</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;That’s EXACTLY what he wants you to think.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can&#039;t help being reminded of the scene from &quot;Little Big Man&quot;:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWGAdzn5_KU&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You Go Down There&lt;/a&gt;

Soros probably regards the prospect of a Gingrich candidacy or a Romney presidency as a &quot;win-win&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p>That’s EXACTLY what he wants you to think.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t help being reminded of the scene from &#8220;Little Big Man&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWGAdzn5_KU" rel="nofollow">You Go Down There</a></p>
<p>Soros probably regards the prospect of a Gingrich candidacy or a Romney presidency as a &#8220;win-win&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dicentra		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/31/gingrich-wont-debate-obama-if-the-media-sets-the-terms/#comment-311962</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dicentra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=13323#comment-311962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Gingrich’s behavior over the past few days has been downright bizarre. I’d say it’s probably a sign of desperation.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;d say it&#039;s a sign of narcissistic personality disorder. NPDs can&#039;t respond to criticism sanely or gracefully, but rather lash out irrationally, usually to their own detriment.

They&#039;re so fixated on destroying the one who dissed them that they can&#039;t see how absurd or destructive their vengeance has become.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Gingrich’s behavior over the past few days has been downright bizarre. I’d say it’s probably a sign of desperation.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a sign of narcissistic personality disorder. NPDs can&#8217;t respond to criticism sanely or gracefully, but rather lash out irrationally, usually to their own detriment.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re so fixated on destroying the one who dissed them that they can&#8217;t see how absurd or destructive their vengeance has become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
