<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Romney the projected NH winner	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: davisbr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304660</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davisbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Huge forces are in play, and the stakes are control of the world’s only superpower.&lt;/em&gt;

Point.

...and scares hell outta me, too.

What do the Players see, that we cannot?

Why have people dropped out, or declined, who would have been viable candidates ...one of whom, I swear, would have been the next POTUS?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Huge forces are in play, and the stakes are control of the world’s only superpower.</em></p>
<p>Point.</p>
<p>&#8230;and scares hell outta me, too.</p>
<p>What do the Players see, that we cannot?</p>
<p>Why have people dropped out, or declined, who would have been viable candidates &#8230;one of whom, I swear, would have been the next POTUS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beverly		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beverly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wolla: Word. 

Huge forces are in play, and the stakes are control of the world&#039;s only superpower.

I think we forget that little detail sometimes. Think what the ring of power means to a man, any man. And shudder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolla: Word. </p>
<p>Huge forces are in play, and the stakes are control of the world&#8217;s only superpower.</p>
<p>I think we forget that little detail sometimes. Think what the ring of power means to a man, any man. And shudder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wolla Dalbo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolla Dalbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Neo--I note the reports/analyses/information that has briefly surfaced, here and there, over the last few years, indicating/ asserting that this very convenient &quot;financial collapse&quot; that &quot;put Obama over the top&quot; was, in fact, an engineered one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neo&#8211;I note the reports/analyses/information that has briefly surfaced, here and there, over the last few years, indicating/ asserting that this very convenient &#8220;financial collapse&#8221; that &#8220;put Obama over the top&#8221; was, in fact, an engineered one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: davisbr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304410</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davisbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304410</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2012/01/10/on-romney-bain-and-keeping-your-integrity/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2012/01/10/on-romney-bain-and-keeping-your-integrity/" rel="nofollow">This.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Doom: are you really suggesting that McCain&#039;s Republican opponents would have surely beaten Obama in 2008?  I think that suggestion is risible.

Remember, also, that McCain was winning in all the polls until the financial collapse, which came very late in the game.  That&#039;s what finally put Obama over the top.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doom: are you really suggesting that McCain&#8217;s Republican opponents would have surely beaten Obama in 2008?  I think that suggestion is risible.</p>
<p>Remember, also, that McCain was winning in all the polls until the financial collapse, which came very late in the game.  That&#8217;s what finally put Obama over the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: davisbr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davisbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[...I loathed McCain: he&#039;d made it clear over the year that he loathed conservatives, so I felt the reciprocity was entirely justified. Paybacks.

I would not have voted for him in &#039;08 (nor contributed to his campaign), and was planning to leave the top of the ticket blank (I would have voted for Hilary over McCain out of pure spite, but the Dem&#039;s decided to run the untried, untested, unremarkable Light Bringer instead) ...

...except for McCain&#039;s unexpected and wonderful out-of-right-field VP choice. I got on board.

But Gov. Palin was too little, too late, and entirely too mismanaged (entirely due to the McCain campaign&#039;s equally entirely expected failure to execute). 

We lost. The years since then have been an unmitigated disaster for the nation ...the only bright spot was the Tea Party.

This time the GOP appears determined to - again -  run someone based on some unserviceable belief in the trope of the importance of a candidate&#039;s &quot;electability&quot;: to wit, a northeastern Beltway insider that will do almost as little to excite the base than McCain did.

Because, apparently, that worked so well last time?

Brilliant.

Oh, I&#039;m going to vote for the sob ...purely as an ABO ...rather than &lt;em&gt;plan&lt;/em&gt; on leaving the ballot blank. He&#039;s got that from me, at least: he&#039;s not McCain. Whoo-hoo.

But with little hope it will mean anything on November 3 ...

...for the trope of his &quot;electability&quot; is unfounded. The man has been running since 2007, and he&#039;s at a whopping 23% of the party. Jeezus.

He&#039;s going to be absolutely killed by the Obama machine with the Bain stuff, with the class war rhetoric, with the utterly vacant resonance that the man has exhibited with the GOP base. They&#039;ve been prepping for him since 2008 for gawd&#039;s sake: they, at least, see his glass jaw.

&lt;em&gt;We&lt;/em&gt; don&#039;t want him you know. It should be obvious, but &lt;em&gt;we&lt;/em&gt; don&#039;t trust him to be anything but the second coming of the country-club Rockefeller branch of the GOP.

Remember them? - They were the GOP that were perfectly content to play second fiddle to the Democrats for a half century or so. Whose main purpose was to go along to get along ...and keep the elites in power, and the serfs in their place.

They&#039;re baaaaack.

---
Even if by some miracle he wins, the conservative movement will have lost this battle, and will take some time to recover.

Hope you&#039;re good with that. Thanks a million.

Oh ...and that Whig Moment? - It&#039;s coming. Count on it.

I&#039;ll shut up now. My betters have put me in my place. 

For now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;I loathed McCain: he&#8217;d made it clear over the year that he loathed conservatives, so I felt the reciprocity was entirely justified. Paybacks.</p>
<p>I would not have voted for him in &#8217;08 (nor contributed to his campaign), and was planning to leave the top of the ticket blank (I would have voted for Hilary over McCain out of pure spite, but the Dem&#8217;s decided to run the untried, untested, unremarkable Light Bringer instead) &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;except for McCain&#8217;s unexpected and wonderful out-of-right-field VP choice. I got on board.</p>
<p>But Gov. Palin was too little, too late, and entirely too mismanaged (entirely due to the McCain campaign&#8217;s equally entirely expected failure to execute). </p>
<p>We lost. The years since then have been an unmitigated disaster for the nation &#8230;the only bright spot was the Tea Party.</p>
<p>This time the GOP appears determined to &#8211; again &#8211;  run someone based on some unserviceable belief in the trope of the importance of a candidate&#8217;s &#8220;electability&#8221;: to wit, a northeastern Beltway insider that will do almost as little to excite the base than McCain did.</p>
<p>Because, apparently, that worked so well last time?</p>
<p>Brilliant.</p>
<p>Oh, I&#8217;m going to vote for the sob &#8230;purely as an ABO &#8230;rather than <em>plan</em> on leaving the ballot blank. He&#8217;s got that from me, at least: he&#8217;s not McCain. Whoo-hoo.</p>
<p>But with little hope it will mean anything on November 3 &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;for the trope of his &#8220;electability&#8221; is unfounded. The man has been running since 2007, and he&#8217;s at a whopping 23% of the party. Jeezus.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s going to be absolutely killed by the Obama machine with the Bain stuff, with the class war rhetoric, with the utterly vacant resonance that the man has exhibited with the GOP base. They&#8217;ve been prepping for him since 2008 for gawd&#8217;s sake: they, at least, see his glass jaw.</p>
<p><em>We</em> don&#8217;t want him you know. It should be obvious, but <em>we</em> don&#8217;t trust him to be anything but the second coming of the country-club Rockefeller branch of the GOP.</p>
<p>Remember them? &#8211; They were the GOP that were perfectly content to play second fiddle to the Democrats for a half century or so. Whose main purpose was to go along to get along &#8230;and keep the elites in power, and the serfs in their place.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re baaaaack.</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
Even if by some miracle he wins, the conservative movement will have lost this battle, and will take some time to recover.</p>
<p>Hope you&#8217;re good with that. Thanks a million.</p>
<p>Oh &#8230;and that Whig Moment? &#8211; It&#8217;s coming. Count on it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll shut up now. My betters have put me in my place. </p>
<p>For now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304403</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CZ: when Romney and his wife-to-be went on their first date (in high school), they saw the movie &quot;The Sound of Music.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CZ: when Romney and his wife-to-be went on their first date (in high school), they saw the movie &#8220;The Sound of Music.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304401</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Artfldgr: I can&#039;t figure out why you would take Brazile&#039;s statement at face value.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artfldgr: I can&#8217;t figure out why you would take Brazile&#8217;s statement at face value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wolla Dalbo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304394</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolla Dalbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Over at Gatewaypundit (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/) they have highlighted Fox news statistics--that I have not seen mentioned anywhere else-- that show that Ron Paul got more votes from Democrats than Republicans in both Iowa and New Hampshire.


P.S.--When asked the other night what Ron Paul&#039;s chances were to be the Republican nominee, Brit Hume quipped that Rue Paul (the black drag queen)  had more of a chance than Ron Paul.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at Gatewaypundit (<a href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/</a>) they have highlighted Fox news statistics&#8211;that I have not seen mentioned anywhere else&#8211; that show that Ron Paul got more votes from Democrats than Republicans in both Iowa and New Hampshire.</p>
<p>P.S.&#8211;When asked the other night what Ron Paul&#8217;s chances were to be the Republican nominee, Brit Hume quipped that Rue Paul (the black drag queen)  had more of a chance than Ron Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Trimegistus		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2012/01/10/romney-the-projected-nh-winner/#comment-304374</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trimegistus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=12577#comment-304374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll vote for Romney. Is he exactly the candidate I want? No. For twenty years I&#039;ve voted for candidates who weren&#039;t exactly what I wanted. 

I know what I don&#039;t want: another four years of Obama.

Has anyone checked to see if Soros is funding Ron Paul or some of the other noisy spoilers in the Republican race?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll vote for Romney. Is he exactly the candidate I want? No. For twenty years I&#8217;ve voted for candidates who weren&#8217;t exactly what I wanted. </p>
<p>I know what I don&#8217;t want: another four years of Obama.</p>
<p>Has anyone checked to see if Soros is funding Ron Paul or some of the other noisy spoilers in the Republican race?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
