Comments on: Spambot of the day https://thenewneo.com/2011/12/13/spambot-of-the-day-62/ A blog about political change, among other things Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:21:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Data Schlepper https://thenewneo.com/2011/12/13/spambot-of-the-day-62/#comment-295618 Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:21:40 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=11829#comment-295618 Do members of the Monty Python troupe get a royalty whenever spam is sent?

]]> By: neo-neocon https://thenewneo.com/2011/12/13/spambot-of-the-day-62/#comment-295302 Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:57:15 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=11829#comment-295302 spambot: try me.

]]> By: spambot https://thenewneo.com/2011/12/13/spambot-of-the-day-62/#comment-295296 Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:09:35 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=11829#comment-295296 You will miss us when we are gone.

]]> By: Andrew_M_Garland https://thenewneo.com/2011/12/13/spambot-of-the-day-62/#comment-295183 Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:19:09 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=11829#comment-295183 This isn’t a spambot, but it would make a great one. This links to an article which is supposed to be post-modernist thought. It is generated by the computer program Postmodernism Generator.

=== ===
[excerpt]  The Rubicon of Reality: Precultural socialism, socialism and neomaterial capitalist theory

1. Consensuses of fatal flaw

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the concept of textual art. It could be said that Baudrillard promotes the use of neostructuralist constructive theory to deconstruct capitalism. The subject is contextualised into a predialectic paradigm of expression that includes narrativity as a reality.

“Sexual identity is part of the meaninglessness of truth,” says Foucault; however, according to Cameron [1] , it is not so much sexual identity that is part of the meaninglessness of truth, but rather the rubicon, and subsequent stasis, of sexual identity. Therefore, Bataille’s model of textual nationalism holds that the raison d’etre of the writer is significant form. The characteristic theme of Prinn’s [2] critique of semiotic neotextual theory is the difference between class and society.
=== ===

]]>