Raising CAIN? A Critical Look At Policy

Math follows.

I can’t believe that Romney would’ve been as extreme as the Wan — but it’s plain that Romney’s plan was Zero’s template.

Romney’s bread and butter was just such corporate restructurings.

“. . . what the nation needs now is a leader, someone who reminds us of what makes America great. I’ve never felt worse about our country after hearing Cain speak. Can’t say the same about Obama, . . . .”

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/15/herman-cain-proves-resourcefulness-with-impromptu-rendition-of-impossible-dream/

Following your exposition of Harry Belefonte denouncing Herman Cain because he is simply the recipient of GOOD luck and especially in light of Darrell’s comment above (10:07 pm) this seems like an appropriate time to repeat the following quote from Robert Heinlein:

“Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded – here and there, now and then – are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty. This is known as ‘bad luck.'”

As it was planned that they should.

All that’s needed is a leader who knows the press is corrupt

The rot goes deeper than that, although that is the most egregious instance of it. Not to go all tin foil hat here, but the media are merely the bullhorn and cheerleaders for a Red cabal. Notice how all of these “spontaneous” movements arise everywhere, at the same time, with the same talking points and slogans? I don’t think that that’s coincidence. JournoList was just one case where the coordinating mechanism was revealed.

But with a difference. Romney’s turn-arounds consisted of LBOs and asset strip-outs to get to core, profitable businesses.

Cain came in as an expert from HQ — and then LBO’d Godfather’s into something large — in a BRUTALLY competitive field where you’ve really got to have some skills to pull it off.

Cain has been successful at virtually everything he’s turned his hand to. That’s a KILLER trait. Even Steve Jobs can’t make that claim.

As for lack of government experience: he was the President of the KC Fed! It’s not a role for dolts. In case you’re not aware, the KC Fed is the primary statistics branch for the whole system — and so has a huge analytic section.

Because of his insider knowledge — particularly WRT KC — Cain is IDEAL for treading through the Fed’s paper trail.

It’s a MUST HAVE qualification for our times.

By comparison, the Wan is innumerate. He can’t even perform long division. He can’t even understand ‘order of magnitude.’ That’s why he pitches the total absurdity of the Buffet sur-tax which could raise but half a days spending per year.

I can’t imagine Romney repealing Obamacare — since it is nothing but son-of-Romneycare. But Obamacare’s above-the-line employment tax is the greatest job killer of all time.

Newt is smart — but has crippling issues that would certainly sink him on the campaign. Just too many issues — and the MSM know it.

Huntsman is attention-whoring. No chance whatsoever.

Perry’s dead. He has flunked THE critical campaign test: the TV spotlight. The Wan would absolutely crush him. Just wait until the opfor research fleshes out his negatives.

Romney is the pick of the MSM — just as McCain was. Both will have conservatives sitting on their hands instead of voting.

BTW, the GM/Chrysler bailout was Romney’s plan … or don’t you remember?

So Romney = Obama – light.