Methink that Gramscian methods were the next step. One seemingly innocuous step at a time.
Slice the baloney each slice real fine till it is all gone ……

I think Breivik is completely correct about Islam in Europe and the criminal governing class that brought it there. But no more Breiviks, but maybe, pretty please?, a Lenin.

By Phyllis Chesler: The 5 Biggest Lies Told about Oslo Shooter Anders Breivik

The Norwegian government’s refusal to deal with the reality of hostile, separatist, un-assimilated, and violent Muslim enclaves in its midst is what finally forced Breivik’s hand. The proof is that Breivik did not murder Muslims. His was a mainly Caucasian-on-Caucasian, infidel-on-infidel, Norwegian-on-Norwegian massacre. Breivik turned on what he viewed as a fifth column, the Norwegian elite. They had the power to insist that Muslim immigrants speak Norwegian and embrace European Enlightenment values. They refused to do so. His message to Norway’s “progressives” is chillingly clear. Their teenage children, already well indoctrinated, will not live to carry out what Breivik viewed as their parents’ failed multi-cultural policies.

The Norwegian government’s refusal to deal with the reality of hostile, separatist, un-assimilated, and violent Muslim enclaves in its midst is what finally forced Breivik’s hand. The proof is that Breivik did not murder Muslims. His was a mainly Caucasian-on-Caucasian, infidel-on-infidel, Norwegian-on-Norwegian massacre. Breivik turned on what he viewed as a fifth column, the Norwegian elite. They had the power to insist that Muslim immigrants speak Norwegian and embrace European Enlightenment values. They refused to do so. His message to Norway’s “progressives” is chillingly clear. Their teenage children, already well indoctrinated, will not live to carry out what Breivik viewed as their parents’ failed multi-cultural policies.

Writers work with words; killers write in blood. Breivik could have read all our anti-jihadic work. Like the Dutchman, Geert Wilders, he could have run for public office or launched an educational campaign. True, he would have had to live with being demonized as a racist and criminally sued; ironically, Breivik’s violent approach has led to a similar outcome. Breivik could have made a film about the normalized violence against Muslim-European girls and women at the hands of their families or about the honor killing of Muslim-Norwegian women– but Breivik might have risked the Dutchman Theo van Gogh’s fate and been butchered by an Islamist. Breivik could have penned some fairly innocuous “Mohammed” cartoons, as the Swede Lars Vilks did – but he would have had to live in hiding and with round the clock security. Or, like Lars Langballe, a Danish parliamentarian, he could have spoken his truth and been prosecuted for “hate speech,” just as Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was in Austria.

And at Belmont Club: Universal Guilt is Universal Condemnation

The left is diabolical. It’s straight out of Machiavelli’s “The Prince.” Coercion and repression by proxy. Populate the conquered land with your own people, just as the English did in Northern Ireland. In Norway they import an ideologically alien population for the sole purpose of repressing their own people and ultimately destroying their own culture. Then they expect the people to assist them in mass suicide. Unbelievable!

Breivik is no madman. He is an isomer, a mirror image of the left’s genocidal destruction of european culture. He is the abyss peering back into the face of nihilism. They should fear him and live in dread of what he represents. For he is them. But they won’t. Instead they will use him to strengthen their stranglehold on European freedom.

Breivek is reprehensible, a monster. He was also inevitable.