Here’s what: Dulled (and dull) as Mr. Chomsky’s ideas might be in the West, they remain razors outside of it. “Among the most capable of those from your side who speak on this topic [the war in Iraq] and on the manufacturing of public opinion is Noam Chomsky, who spoke sober words of advice prior to the war,” said bin Laden in 2007. He was singing the professor’s praises again last year, saying “Noam Chomsky was correct when he compared the U.S. policies to those of the mafia.”

These words seem to have been deeply felt. Every wannabe philosopher–and bin Laden was certainly that–seeks the imprimatur of someone he supposes to be a real philosopher. Mr. Chomsky could not furnish bin Laden with a theology, but he did provide an intellectual architecture for his hatred of the United States. That Mr. Chomsky speaks from the highest tower of American academe, that he is so widely feted as the great mind of his generation, that his every utterance finds a publisher and an audience, could only have sustained bin Laden in the conceit that his thinking was on a high plane. Maybe it would have been different if Mr. Chomsky had been dismissed decades ago for what he is: a two-nickel crank.

Noam has the Bin Laden seal of approval. Need we know more?

People think their eugenics obsession with intelligence and good blood somehow makes them superior to all the working peasants and farmers in the world, but it just isn’t so. Intelligence, and Harvard degrees, don’t make you superior to anyone. In fact, such crutches make you more of a slavish slave devoted to the plantation Master than was ever the case for black slaves in America. The shackles that bound plantation slaves were mostly physical, not mental, in nature. Once a person makes a shackle out of their own thoughts, they cannot be freed.

Smart does not equal good. In point of fact, people utilizing the intelligence they were born with to serve the cause of evil, such as Chommie and Lins, are worse then the dumbest people on the Earth.

A permanent vacation:

My Boyfriend’s Back

“… it’s just sad most people nowadays want to attack others instead of discussing things.. ”

You may cry a river and please do, but no one here will cry one over you.

Come to think of it, I still am. No one can be that delusional and keep breathing.

“Chomsky’s influence is best understood not as that of an intellectual figure, but as the leader of a secular religious cult — as the ayatollah of anti-American hate.”

Horowitz has been gunning for that old sinner for years; his chosen field of battle is The Academy, and he sees the Ayatollah of MIT as the chief priest of the Haters. Chompsky, btw, lives Very Well in the bosom of the country the treasonous POS despises. Like most home-grown enemies of our country, he’s fattened himself and his bank account with the profits from his venomous hatred.

The Sick Mind of Noam Chomsky

“WITHOUT QUESTION, the most devious, the most dishonest and — in this hour of his nation’s grave crisis — the most treacherous intellect in America belongs to MIT professor Noam Chomsky. On the 150 campuses that have mounted “teach-ins” and rallies [on Sept. 20, 2001] … wherever young people manifest an otherwise incomprehensible rage against their country, the inspirer of their loathing and the instructor of their hate is most likely this man.

There are many who ask how it is possible that our most privileged and educated youth should come to despise their own nation — a free, open, democratic society — and to do so with such ferocious passion. They ask how it is possible for American youth to even consider lending comfort and aid to the Osama bin Ladens and the Saddam Husseins (and the Communists before them). A full answer would involve a search of the deep structures of the human psyche, and its irrepressible longings for a redemptive illusion. But the short answer is to be found in the speeches and writings of an embittered academic and his intellectual supporters.

For 40 years, Noam Chomsky has turned out book after book, pamphlet after pamphlet and speech after speech with one message, and one message alone: America is the Great Satan; it is the fount of evil in the world. In Chomsky’s demented universe, America is responsible not only for its own bad deeds, but for the bad deeds of others, including those of the terrorists who struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. In this attitude he is the medium for all those who now search the ruins of Manhattan, not for the victims and the American dead, but for the “root causes” of the catastrophe that befell them.

One little pamphlet of Chomsky’s — “What Uncle Sam Really Wants” — has already sold 160,000 copies (1), but this represents only the tip of the Chomsky iceberg. His venomous message is spread on tapes and CDs, and the campus lecture circuit; he is promoted at rock concerts by superstar bands such as Pearl Jam, Rage Against the Machine, and U-2 (whose lead singer Bono called Chomsky a “rebel without a pause”). He is the icon of Hollywood stars like Matt Damon whose genius character in the Academy Award-winning film Good Will Hunting is made to invoke Chomsky as the go-to authority for political insight.

… In fact, Chomsky’s influence is best understood not as that of an intellectual figure, but as the leader of a secular religious cult — as the ayatollah of anti-American hate. …

In his first statement on the terrorist attack, Chomsky’s response to Osama bin Laden’s calculated strike on a building containing 50,000 innocent human beings was to eclipse it with an even greater atrocity he was confident he could attribute to former president Bill Clinton.

Chomsky’s infamous September 12 statement “On the Bombings” began:

“The terrorist attacks were major atrocities. In scale they may not reach the level of many others, for example, Clinton’s bombing of the Sudan with no credible pretext, destroying half its pharmaceutical supplies and killing unknown numbers of people (no one knows, because the US blocked an inquiry at the UN and no one cares to pursue it).”(4)

Observe the syntax. The opening reference to the actual attacks is clipped and bloodless, a kind of rhetorical throat clearing for Chomsky to get out of the way, so that he can announce the real subject of his concern — America’s crimes. The accusation against Clinton is even slipped into the text, weasel fashion, as though it were a modifier, when it is actually the substantive message itself.

It is a message that says: Look away, America, from the injury that has been done to you, and contemplate the injuries you have done to them. It is in this sleight of hand that Chomsky reveals his true gift, which is to make the victim, America, appear as an even more heinous perpetrator than the criminal himself. “However bad this may seem, you have done worse.”

In point of fact — and just for the record — however ill-conceived Bill Clinton’s decision to launch a missile into the Sudan, it was not remotely comparable to the World Trade Center massacre. It was, in its very design, precisely the opposite — a defensive response that attempted to minimize casualties. … Chomsky’s use of this incident to diminish the monstrosity of the terrorist attack is a typical Chomsky maneuver, an accurate measure of his instinctive mendacity, and an index of the anti-American dementia which infuses everything he writes and says.

This same psychotic hatred shapes the “historical” perspective he offered to his disciples in an interview conducted a few days after the World Trade Center bombing. It was intended to present America as the devil incarnate — and therefore a worthy target of attack for the guerilla forces of “social justice” all over the world.”

This link leads to several Horowitz essays on Frontpage Magazine online, on Chompsky. Really an eye-opener if you think Noam is just an eccentric moonbat. Horowitz makes the case that he’s an active and knowing agent of evil, a viper we have nursed at our bosom.

http://preview.tinyurl.com/3gvqxew