http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1101210.htm

He has appealed for a suspension of the violence. Our media has gone silent about the Pope though, since it doesn’t fit their pro-Obama agenda.

One of my Cath newspapers featured the Archbishop of Libya expressing what a horrible thing this is to get involved in. He said that initially is was Libyan vs Libyan – Muslim vs Muslim. Now, it’s possible it will be seen as a Crusade… sigh…

It’s always easier to take funds from the military when the military needs replenishment of large scale war munitions. Like Vietnam, a lot of that money looks real juicy to Obama’s cronies. A lot of it will go into their pockets and be redistributed there, instead of to the US front lines.

Discretionary spending or surplus spending for military operations has to be voted on, yes. Maintenance for these weapon systems are already there. So if you spend them now, but don’t restock because you control Congress, then you get rid of the maintenance costs. Then you can start getting rid of the military jobs for them.

Well, that’s why I think Obama’s sitting with a big fat grin on his face as he makes our military suffer more stress and combat at least. Just a personal view and assessment, rather than a logical analysis.

Why would anyone believe so?

Information is not so tight that the funnels are so singular.

The only way to train flight skills is to get them up in the air and fly em. Well, I suppose that doesn’t make sense to people who think their words can cause the sea levels to lower. Too bad that didn’t work for the tsunami in Japan, eh. Then again, I guess Obama was bowing to the Japanese for that ahead of time.

The Chinese embassy was a deliberate mistake by an USAF general flying in total blackout from Conus and back.

Strangely, the precision munitions hit the cypher room in the wee hours when only three spies were sending intel back home/ receiving orders.

That’s some mistake!

—–

The ordnance pictured in the WaPo appears to be uniquely American. It’s a concrete filled artillery tube with precision tacked on.

The flight profile indicates a high speed low altitude release. Since the ‘residence’ is adjacent to the coast such a profile was quite practical.

It didn’t fail to detonate since such was never intended.

Nothing would lead anyone to believe the Duck of Death’s press releases. They’ve been pure chaff so far.

In support of your observations was the USAF experience with the F104 Starfighter in the Sixties. The Germans crashed them with great regularity while American pilots did not. It was an unforgiving plane to fly, but the Americans had far more training flight hours allotted.

But even in OEF, a pilot error with the GPS guidance allowed a JDAM to drop right ontop of a SF A-Team and their local platoon of Afghan allies. But this was in the beginning and people hadn’t had the chance to correct their training procedures and human errors.

Whenever I would heard of a mistake in bombing, it was almost always attributed to NATO, meaning French or German, fighter pilots. That’s to be expected given their lower standard of quality across the board and how little funding they can squeeze from their anti-American, anti-war political hacks at home.

So when I hear of NATo doing this or doing, I’m hedging towards the view that if it was a mistake, it was made by NATO allied members. And if it was deliberate, it was made by US command.

Whether they thought they would get bombed while doing so, is a mystery.

After all, they know that we tried to blow up Saddam once a twice in OIF. So it is not entirely impossible. And Qadaffi of all people, who lost a son to US bombing retaliation, should know the risks. But that doesn’t mean they knew how to mitigate those risks.