they are hypergamous…

they are not happy with a husband they support at home… it goes against the biology of selecting a better mate over indiscriminate uncaring guilt free sex….

women select men for competency of outcome
men do not select women for such…

recent study, women are more forgiving..

if they are more forgiving what are they forgiving, the truth that the dress makes their butt larger, or the lies?

its in our culture.. literature… etc..

lets take it to evolutionary psychology.

also, keep in mind that women can read faces better than men, and so they can determine lies better (but their emotions and fears socks in a wrench with hormones as a ball peen hammer).

which group is more likely to be represented in the future..

the woman who detects lies, and does not forgive them, and so there is much lower access to her over time

or the woman who detects lies, forgives them, and so has more mates have access

or the woman who cant detect lies..

well, the first is not favored for selection as much as the second one, and the third one is dysfunctional outside of relationships if ability to know is absent.

so the most promoted is the one where they know how to detect lies, but forgive lies from a potential mate to increase facilitation.

if we were decendent from number 1, we would not lie as much as we do..

and the third one would dominate lower areas of the population if there is soicalism.

we might not like the idea of finding lies acceptable, but really… if a hypergamous woman was told a lie by a man worth 40 million, they wouldnt ignore it?

and they dont care about truth from a gas station attendant…

http://maciverinstitute.com/2010/03/average-mps-teacher-compensation-tops-100kyear/

For instance, at $56,000 the average MPS teacher’s salary is about $13,000 higher than the average Milwaukee household income. And the school system’s results suck big time.

Funny, how they don’t talk about things like that in the news reports, isn’t it?

I’ve been living with women all my life, (in close proximity to one for 37 years) and some days they prefer competency and some days they don’t. I wouldn’t try to pigeonhole them any more than I would men. I humbly submit that people are not peacock

And they day I go to “any geek” for advice is the day I give up drinking entirely.

You might want to peek at this: http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2011/Feb-17.html

LBJ, Bush 41, Bush 43: I’m in the No New Texans crowd, but if your economy continues to outperform I’ll have to look seriously at Perry.

i can quote a recent study out (like a week or so), that confirms such…

women do not have an empirical burden on them, as men do…

before you deny it, remember women select men for competency and men select them for other reasons… peacock tails are not what they are because female peahens hate them.

any geek can tell you that they prefer to be gamed and played than honest and boring…

thug culture wouldnt survive ten minutes if women walked away from them every time..

and geeks would be heroes if they walked over loving brains, honesty, and such.

in the past the women didn’t like the honest men because they were honest. they liked them because they were strong enough to keep the opponents honest.

from physorg:
Women are better at forgiving: study
A study by the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) has carried out the first Spanish study into the emotional differences between the sexes and generations in terms of forgiveness. According to the study, parents forgive more than children, while women are better at forgiving than men.

well, a person who wants truth, would be less forgiving, as forgiving lies, does not make for honesty. does it?

i can also put tons of other info to back my claim..

fro evolutionary psychology and Chinese studies (they dont have feminism forbidding results).

That kind of ignorance comes from a life of ignoring facts.

The probable downside for the Democrats is so much greater than the possible upside that I’d love to see him try. He would probably work through an “independent” federal agency or the courts, but I don’t think many people would be fooled.

By all means, let the voters watch this condescending twit of a President with a $1.6T budget deficit impose policy on a state that’s honestly struggling with its fiscal imbalances.

Please please please.

The campaign ads and speeches would write themselves.

This could spread and become ugly. The newly elected governor of Connecticut, a Democrat, just unveiled his budget with significant reductions for state workers… he’s telling the truth (though he’s also wants large tax increases, but I have to give him some props for looking at the state worker’s health/pensions/salaries). Today I just heard the local AFL-CIO leader fired a verbal shot across the governor’s bow.

As more and more states try to reign in their budgets we are looking at full scale labor violence, with our esteemed president egging them on. Pretty much settles the ‘knave vs fool’ argument for me.