<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Watson and Jeopardy: computer vs. people	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:46:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: How To Know The Best Idea Burger Shared &#124; Lifestyle 24		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-284837</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How To Know The Best Idea Burger Shared &#124; Lifestyle 24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-284837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] delectable steak patty can be a business well loved encircling the globe. Tags: &#124; find out more &#124; click for more info &#124;     Categories: Uncategorized Tags:         Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] delectable steak patty can be a business well loved encircling the globe. Tags: | find out more | click for more info |     Categories: Uncategorized Tags:         Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226935</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by the way, the system works the same

the philosophers shout, and the speakers they dont like dont get to speak


back then it was against women
today, they would have no standing if we knew that, and they would never get women to side with them if they knew, so better to correct that historical mistake, hand it off to someone else, and use it as a weapon, now we know what people really think (and so can use that info with theory of mind to power)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way, the system works the same</p>
<p>the philosophers shout, and the speakers they dont like dont get to speak</p>
<p>back then it was against women<br />
today, they would have no standing if we knew that, and they would never get women to side with them if they knew, so better to correct that historical mistake, hand it off to someone else, and use it as a weapon, now we know what people really think (and so can use that info with theory of mind to power)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226933</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by the way... here is an example of the game

you read emmy history
The philosophical faculty objected, however, and she spent four years lecturing under Hilbert’s name. 

and the columbia page
On July 16, 1918, before a scientific organization in Gé¶ttingen, Felix Klein read a paper written by Emmy Noether, because she was not allowed to present the paper before the scientific organization herself.

see the HALF truth!!! 

she was not allowed because AGAIN as with today, the philosophers dictated things NOT the scientists, the mathemeticians, not even the administration! 

today they changed their minds, but their kick is to dictate their ideas so that people will experiment for them and they having no morals think that to ahve permission is not good. 

but look at those two points from two different sources. one is historical, and the other is progressive historical

one puts blame on the philosophers and academics who today take the opposite side.. 

and the other IMPLIES that it was the whole of education, and society!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

now today, we have no knowlege of these whiny philosophers who didnt want to argue with women as totheir work (doubleing their trouble)... 

and we believe that ALL men and great men like hilbert and others (mostly white) were the oppressors. 

when in truth... their presenting her paper to get around the philosophers stupidity. 

is no different than a ghost writer who was submitting plays to get around the philosophers of anti communism!!!!!!!!!!!!!

see.. historically speaking, you can find these idiots motivating people and then through thei rnoise getting the oil of the squeeky wheel. 

yuo need to know the fine details to know what they leave out.

in this case, one department is expanded to all of society and expecially every man.. 

by the way, care to note the sexual orientation and atttudes of the philosophers compared to the conservative people, who believed in merit? 

the philosophers hate that their made up bs is not as respected as the math guys. 

so is it any wonder that ideologues the army of philosopers in poliitics, would erase their metrosexual whiny history, and misattribute it to others, so that they can gather to them what they lost by having that position ni the past? 

not that they care waht position they take other than which leads to power. the philosophers that stopped her, had power. today, the ones that used that same position as a social weapon based on their past experience, are also using power. 

ignorance is your enemy
ignorance is curable

but like psychology they have to want to be cured.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way&#8230; here is an example of the game</p>
<p>you read emmy history<br />
The philosophical faculty objected, however, and she spent four years lecturing under Hilbert’s name. </p>
<p>and the columbia page<br />
On July 16, 1918, before a scientific organization in Gé¶ttingen, Felix Klein read a paper written by Emmy Noether, because she was not allowed to present the paper before the scientific organization herself.</p>
<p>see the HALF truth!!! </p>
<p>she was not allowed because AGAIN as with today, the philosophers dictated things NOT the scientists, the mathemeticians, not even the administration! </p>
<p>today they changed their minds, but their kick is to dictate their ideas so that people will experiment for them and they having no morals think that to ahve permission is not good. </p>
<p>but look at those two points from two different sources. one is historical, and the other is progressive historical</p>
<p>one puts blame on the philosophers and academics who today take the opposite side.. </p>
<p>and the other IMPLIES that it was the whole of education, and society!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>now today, we have no knowlege of these whiny philosophers who didnt want to argue with women as totheir work (doubleing their trouble)&#8230; </p>
<p>and we believe that ALL men and great men like hilbert and others (mostly white) were the oppressors. </p>
<p>when in truth&#8230; their presenting her paper to get around the philosophers stupidity. </p>
<p>is no different than a ghost writer who was submitting plays to get around the philosophers of anti communism!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>see.. historically speaking, you can find these idiots motivating people and then through thei rnoise getting the oil of the squeeky wheel. </p>
<p>yuo need to know the fine details to know what they leave out.</p>
<p>in this case, one department is expanded to all of society and expecially every man.. </p>
<p>by the way, care to note the sexual orientation and atttudes of the philosophers compared to the conservative people, who believed in merit? </p>
<p>the philosophers hate that their made up bs is not as respected as the math guys. </p>
<p>so is it any wonder that ideologues the army of philosopers in poliitics, would erase their metrosexual whiny history, and misattribute it to others, so that they can gather to them what they lost by having that position ni the past? </p>
<p>not that they care waht position they take other than which leads to power. the philosophers that stopped her, had power. today, the ones that used that same position as a social weapon based on their past experience, are also using power. </p>
<p>ignorance is your enemy<br />
ignorance is curable</p>
<p>but like psychology they have to want to be cured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[and if your blind you wont see this deconstruction reconstruction to place gays as the secret superior beings who provided us everything that is good!!! 

like:
Elton John: &#039;Jesus was a compassionate, super-intelligent gay man&#039;

here is a site page that tries to give both side of the current deconstructino and reformation of christ in terms of secular reformatino of history and goals.... 

AS WAS DONE TO THE CHURCH IN THE SOVIET UNION
www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jegay.htm


Was Lincoln Gay?
THE INTIMATE WORLD OF
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
By C. A. Tripp.
Edited by Lewis Gannett.
query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9f05e5d61439f93aa35752c0a9639c8b63


by the way...  the whole of the reconstruction takes a bizarre turn as you type in masculine people at random. 

i just tried chesty puller
&lt;i&gt;Lieutenant General Lewis Burwell &quot;Chesty&quot; Puller (June 26, 1898 — October 11, 1971) was an officer in the United States Marine Corps. Puller is the most decorated U.S. Marine in history, and the only Marine to receive five Navy Crosses.&lt;/i&gt;

and waht did i get? a person named cha cha who wants to know if he was gay... why? because the more they can make taht way, the more the lgbt can claim dadt as an issue. 

not only that, but when a real conflict happens, the women in military will insure that the one that can hold out longest will win, as a long war will need children (as known in history)

if you want you can read about the process of ligitimizing through social engineering things as an arbitrary thing... 



how about the other side... social engineering a false dialogue as to womens chauvanism being valid to get more of them to give their lives to science (and as ayn rand said, give up their responsiblity to themselves and family for a stranger and a lie). 

you can read the feminists trying to credit Mileva as the math behind einstein... 

while compeltely ignoring the obituary he wrote for emmy noether crediting her! 

why? 

because the mileva story follows the social engineered answer which they feel will enduce a certain believe which grants them power as long as its beleived, not refuted, and the innocents clubs follow it as if it was real 

they went so far as to make a film &quot;einsteins life&quot;
becasue we learn more about a false reality we belive is real through TV (as the frankfurt schoolw as so quick to latch on to and send people to hollywood)

&lt;i&gt;In 2003 the prestigious Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in the United States broadcast the documentary “Einstein’s Wife”, with extensive website material to accompany the programme. The documentary purports to provide viewers with the facts about the supposed contributions that Einstein’s first wife Mileva MariÄ‡ made to his work. Before I discuss the documentary itself, it is worth noting that the blurb on the DVD box indicates that reliable information is unlikely to be a feature of the programme:

&lt;b&gt;“MariÄ‡, a brilliant mathematician, collaborated with [Einstein] on three famous works: Brownian Motion, Special Relativity Theory and Photoelectric Effect, which won the Nobel Prize for physics in 1921.”&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

so another example of pushing down the inconvenient truth, teaching a lie, and estabilshing a new truth at a new level which if believed changes the natural direction of the subject under social engineered control (which is deemed to be more efficient than OVERT slavery - as the slaves never realize their condition and so cant rebel having no ideas).  

&lt;i&gt;The contention that MariÄ‡ was a brilliant mathematician is erroneous. Although she consistently achieved high grades in mathematics at school, this is not the case for her diploma course at Zurich Polytechnic. On the contrary, in the final diploma exam in 1900 her grade in the maths component was less than half that of any of the other four candidates, and it was largely due to this poor result that she failed the exam&lt;/i&gt;

another example of a women in college when they were not allowed... 

the TRUTH is that they DID underperform the men.. 

which is why today we keep the performig men out of academia so that we can fix the numbers!!! 

you can read how a white, jewish, or chinese student has to get a higher score to beat out a lower scored woman, or race candidate... 

that is, the equal people get in on a score 100 points or more less than the less equal people. 

&lt;i&gt;The contention that MariÄ‡ was a brilliant mathematician is erroneous. Although she consistently achieved high grades in mathematics at school, this is not the case for her diploma course at Zurich Polytechnic. On the contrary, in the final diploma exam in 1900 her grade in the maths component was less than half that of any of the other four candidates, and it was largely due to this poor result that she failed the exam&lt;/i&gt;

again... lets raise up the mediocre as great
and where do we erase the great?

Emmy Noether
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Noether

&lt;b&gt;Amalie Emmy Noether, German pronunciation: [Ëˆné¸ËtÉ], (23 March 1882 — 14 April 1935) was an influential German mathematician known for her groundbreaking contributions to abstract algebra and theoretical physics. Described by David Hilbert, Albert Einstein and others as the most important woman in the history of mathematics,[1][2] she revolutionized the theories of rings, fields, and algebras. In physics, Noether&#039;s theorem explains the fundamental connection between symmetry and conservation laws.[3]&lt;/b&gt;

so why dont we know her? 

for the same reason we dont know ADA and someone like you believes that turing did things he didnt. the TIMELINE shows it to be impossible. 

&lt;i&gt;She was born to a Jewish family in the Bavarian town of Erlangen; her father was the mathematician Max Noether. Emmy originally planned to teach French and English after passing the required examinations, but instead studied mathematics at the University of Erlangen, where her father lectured. After completing her dissertation in 1907 under the supervision of Paul Gordan, she worked at the Mathematical Institute of Erlangen without pay for seven years. In 1915 she was invited by David Hilbert and Felix Klein to join the mathematics department at the University of Gé¶ttingen, a world-renowned center of mathematical research. The philosophical faculty objected, however, and she spent four years lecturing under Hilbert&#039;s name. Her habilitation was approved in 1919, allowing her to obtain the rank of privatdozent.&lt;/i&gt;

for a time that was said not to allow women to be educated, i sure find the very few who all were educated and by great universities and such!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

how to resolve this quandry? 
either the progressive feminsits are lying to their constituency for personal gain, muich to the ruin of their constituency... 

or, the right are even more devious, and were able to anticipate their assault, and plant all these false women and histories to be foudn and so confound the truth of femnism, progressivism, and the soviet, i mean American way!!! 

so far every one of them were in college and with degrees and msot before the soviet revolution of 1917!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

&lt;b&gt;Noether remained a leading member of the Gé¶ttingen mathematics department until 1933; her students were sometimes called the &quot;Noether boys&quot;. In 1924, Dutch mathematician B. L. van der Waerden joined her circle and soon became the leading expositor of Noether&#039;s ideas: her work was the foundation for the second volume of his influential 1931 textbook, Moderne Algebra. By the time of her plenary address at the 1932 International Congress of Mathematicians in Zé¼rich, her algebraic acumen was recognized around the world. The following year, Germany&#039;s Nazi government dismissed Jews from university positions, and Noether moved to the United States to take up a position at Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania. In 1935 she underwent surgery for an ovarian cyst and, despite signs of a recovery, died four days later at the age of 53.&lt;/b&gt;

colleges here, colleges there... taught great men.. 
made herself.. was Jewish... and so on.. 

anyone see a trend that i do? 

you wont see it if you dont knwo the history as it really is, but know it as they tell it to you in lies, and half truths. 

type this phrase into google
women were not allowed to go to college

6,790,000 results 

Early College Women:
Determined to be Educated
www.northnet.org/stlawrenceaauw/college.htm  


When the Women&#039;s Rights Convention was held in 1848 in Seneca Falls, NY, one of the complaints documented in the Declaration of Sentiments was that &quot;The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation&#039;s on the part of man toward women, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. ...He had denied her the facilities of a thorough education, all colleges being closed against her.&quot; One of outcomes of the convention was a demand for higher education. 

want to laugh? 
&lt;b&gt;The conveners of the Convention were justified in their complaint. Women did not have access to higher education before 1848. While a few women might attend a female seminary or academy, they were not allowed into colleges and universities. &lt;/b&gt;

the conveners of the convention went to college!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

&quot;...a girl could study and learn, but she could not do all this and retain uninjured health, and a future secure from neuralgia, uterine disease, hysteria, and other derangements of the nervous system,&quot; according to Dr. Edward Clark in his widely respected Sex and Education published in 1873.


but do the research.. 

you will find that its mostly a careflly constructed lie based on half truths. 

like a card house it only stands if you dont dig into it to see how they made it. 

if you do, it falls apart, or you see the glue

return to the link i put up before

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women%27s_colleges_in_the_United_States

1742: Bethlehem Female Seminary: Founded in Germantown and later moved to Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. It received its collegiate charter in 1863 and in 1913, it became the Moravian Seminary and College for Women. In 1954, it merged with the male institution Moravian College and Theological Seminary and became the coeducational school, Moravian College [2] 

&lt;b&gt;1772: Little Girls&#039; School (now Salem College): Originally established as a primary school, it later became an academy (high school) and finally a college. It is the oldest female educational establishment that is still a women&#039;s college, and the oldest female institution in the Southern United States.&lt;/b&gt;

i thought they also claim that the southerners are dumb and hate women, and blacks? 

&lt;b&gt;Women did not have access to higher education before 1848&lt;/b&gt;

    * 1787: Young Ladies&#039; Academy of Philadelphia [2]
    * 1792: Litchfield Female Academy: Founded in Litchfield, Connecticut; it closed in 1833.
    * 1814: Louisburg Female Academy (now Louisburg College): Founded in North Carolina; Louisburg Female College, founded in 1857. Later merged with Franklin Male Academy
    * 1814: Troy Female Seminary: It became the Emma Willard School in 1895
    * 1818: Elizabeth Female Academy: First female educational institution in Mississippi; it closed in 1843
    * 1821: Clinton Female Seminary: Georgia. Forerunner to Wesleyan College [3]
    * 1822: Athens Female Academy, now Athens State University. Athens, Alabama
    * 1823: Hartford Female Seminary: It closed towards the later half of the 19th century
    * 1827: The Linden Wood School for Girls (now Lindenwood University): Founded in St. Charles, Missouri; it became coeducational in 1969.
    * 1828: Ipswich Female Seminary: It closed in 1878


all womens colleges and all before the meeting in ny claiming otherwise.. 

and thats the US... it was only born less than 100 years bfore that, and had no socialism in its state and taxes to pay for women who could not pay themselves 

AND THATS THE KEY as they are projecting todays new socialist normal to the past (as the do with morals to other things) and so the claim of no school leaves out NO STATE SCHOOLS under the control of a benificient state who gives things to special groups!!

&lt;b&gt;Women did not have access to higher education before 1848&lt;/b&gt;

    * 1831: LaGrange Female Academy (now LaGrange College): Founded in LaGrange, Georgia, it became LaGrange Female College in 1851, and coeducational in 1953
    * 1833: Columbia Female Academy (now Stephens College): Originally established as an academy (high school), it later became a college. It is the second oldest female educational establishment that is still a women&#039;s college
    * 1834: Wheaton Female Seminary (now Wheaton College, Massachusetts): Founded with the help of Mary Lyon; Wheaton became a college in 1912 and coeducational in 1987
    * 1835: Livingston Female Academy and State Normal College (now University of West Alabama); It became coeducational in the 1950s
    * 1836: Washington Female Seminary: closed in 1948
    * 1836: Wesleyan College: Chartered as the Georgia Female College on December 23, 1836, Wesleyan is the world&#039;s oldest women&#039;s college. Still a women&#039;s college
    * 1837: Mount Holyoke Female Seminary (now Mount Holyoke College): It is the oldest (and first) of the Seven Sisters
    * 1838: Judson Female Institute (Judson College (Alabama)): Founded in Marion, Alabama, it became Judson College in 1903 and later Judson College
    * 1839: Farmville Female Seminary Association (now Longwood University): Founded in Farmville, Virginia; it became coeducational in 1976.

&lt;b&gt;Women did not have access to higher education before 1848&lt;/b&gt;

havent even reached 1848 yet.. 
its kind of turning out to be a manufactured history to suuport a manufactured truth, that then raises peoples false conciousness to move for them. 

    * 1840: Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College
    * 1841: Academy of the Sacred Heart (now Manhattanville College)
    * 1842: Fulton Female Academy (now Synodical College): Founded in Fulton, Missouri, it closed in 1928
    * 1842:Valley Union Seminary (now Hollins University): Established in Roanoke, Virginia as a coeducational school, it became a school for women in 1852, and was renamed Hollins Institute in 1855, Hollins College in 1911, and Hollins University in 1998
    * 1842: Augusta Female Seminary (now Mary Baldwin College): Founded in Staunton, Virginia, it became the Mary Baldwin Seminary in 1895, and the Mary Baldwin College in 1923
    * 1844: Saint Mary&#039;s College (Indiana): Founded by the Sisters of the Holy Cross
    * 1845: Limestone Springs Female High School: (now Limestone College) Founded in Gaffney, South Carolina, it began accepting a few male students in the 1920s (who did not live on campus) and became fully coeducational in the late 1960s
    * 1846: Greensboro Female College: Charted in 1838 in Greensboro, North Carolina; it is now the coeducational school Greensboro College
    * 1846: Illinois Conference Female Academy: It is now the coeducational school, MacMurray College
    * 1847: Kentucky Female Orphan School (now Midway College): The school&#039;s day program on its main campus remains all-female to this day. However, it offers coeducational programs on evenings and weekends at several satellite locations around Kentucky, as well as online. It will open a coeducational pharmacy school at a separate campus in 2011.
    * 1847: Academy of Mount Saint Vincent: (now College of Mount Saint Vincent). Founded by the Sisters of Charity of New York; moved from Manhattan to current Riverdale, Bronx site in the 1850&#039;s and began service as degree-granting, four-year liberal arts college in 1911. Became coeducational in 1974.
    * 1848: Philadelphia School of Design for Women (now Moore College of Art and Design): It is the first and only art school which is a women&#039;s college
    * 1848: Chowan Baptist Female Institute; it is now the coeducational school Chowan University
    * 1848: Drexel University College of Medicine: It is now, after several changes including becoming co-ed, Drexel University&#039;s College of Medicine


have to stop now... i reached the end of the colleges that were created for women... 

which dont exist.. 



and from higher learning
WOMEN AND THE ACADEMY
beatl.barnard.columbia.edu/learn/timelines/women.htm


and here is waht they teach the girls were teh colleges opportunitie for women 

notice that the place is columbia, home of the TEACHERS college and franfurt school of social engineering. 

1636 to l830s -- Several dozen colleges founded, none with provisions for training women; similar pattern in Europe

1833 -- Oberlin College opened and shortly thereafter began enrolling women, becoming the1st co-educational college in United States

1836 -- Mary Lyon opened Mount Holyoke Female Seminary to prepare young women for the foreign missions; school not designated a college until 1880s

1836 -- Georgia Female College chartered

1839 -- Georgia Female College opened as a women’s college


hey! columbias and teachers college list is smaller than mine...  

you think that if they use their list to teach the women mibht actually believe that they werent allowed?  

of course.. 

i always wondered how my grandmother was able to be a researcher as i sat in school being told she couldnt have the education she did.. 


do you know Margaret Cavendish? 
why not? 

she was like ADA... on the political right and aristocracy as the left socialists paint the spectrum

&lt;b&gt;
Women who wanted to work in science lived in Germany, but came from a different background. There, the tradition of female participation in craft production enabled some women to become involved in observational science, especially astronomy. Between 1650 and 1710, women made up 14% of all German astronomers&lt;/b&gt;

thats more than later... but thenagain, the measure of normal is the plight of a baby boom mother!!!! who wanted to give up these thigns for family... 

which is why if you compare numbers before the boom and during the boom and after, you learn the lie is founded on a big decline of women participation as the century turned... 

and the socialists siezed upon this as a social crisis, and the big money guys and their children joined the lets adminsitrate everyones life party!!! 

so if you get the details, you will find that more women went to college late 1800s and early 1900s than went druing the 40s through the 60s.. [they were doing other things they wanted until someone confinced them what they wanted was to be state mules for tax largess]

&lt;i&gt;Marie Curie, the first woman to win a Nobel prize in 1903 (physics), went on to become a double Nobel prize winner in 1911 (chemistry), both for her work on radiation.

Lise Meitner played a major role in the discovery of nuclear fission. As head of the physics section at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin she collaborated closely with the head of chemistry Otto Hahn on atomic physics until forced to flee Berlin in 1938. In 1939, in collaboration with her nephew Otto Frisch, Meitner derived the theoretical explanation for an experiment performed by Hahn and Fritz Strassman in Berlin, thereby demonstrating the occurrence of nuclear fission.

The Erlangen program attempted to identify invariants under a group of transformations. On July 16, 1918, before a scientific organization in Gé¶ttingen, Felix Klein read a paper written by Emmy Noether, because she was not allowed to present the paper before the scientific organization herself. In particular, in what is referred to in physics as Noether&#039;s theorem, this paper identified the conditions under which the Poincaré group of transformations (what is now called a gauge group) for general relativity defines conservation laws. Noether&#039;s papers made the requirements for the conservation laws precise. Moreover, among mathematicians Noether is best known for her fundamental contributions to abstract algebra, where the adjective noetherian is nowadays commonly used on many sorts of objects.

Inge Lehmann, a Danish seismologist, first suggested that the inside the Earth&#039;s molten core there may be a solid inner core in 1936.

Women such as Margaret Fountaine continued to contribute detailed observations and illustrations in botany, entomology, and related observational fields.&lt;/i&gt;



&lt;b&gt;so tell me now i dont know!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;/b&gt;






 
College Freshmen In US And China: Chinese Students Know More Science Facts But Neither Group Especially Skilled In Reasoning
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090129140840.htm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and if your blind you wont see this deconstruction reconstruction to place gays as the secret superior beings who provided us everything that is good!!! </p>
<p>like:<br />
Elton John: &#8216;Jesus was a compassionate, super-intelligent gay man&#8217;</p>
<p>here is a site page that tries to give both side of the current deconstructino and reformation of christ in terms of secular reformatino of history and goals&#8230;. </p>
<p>AS WAS DONE TO THE CHURCH IN THE SOVIET UNION<br />
<a href="http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jegay.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jegay.htm</a></p>
<p>Was Lincoln Gay?<br />
THE INTIMATE WORLD OF<br />
ABRAHAM LINCOLN<br />
By C. A. Tripp.<br />
Edited by Lewis Gannett.<br />
query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9f05e5d61439f93aa35752c0a9639c8b63</p>
<p>by the way&#8230;  the whole of the reconstruction takes a bizarre turn as you type in masculine people at random. </p>
<p>i just tried chesty puller<br />
<i>Lieutenant General Lewis Burwell &#8220;Chesty&#8221; Puller (June 26, 1898 — October 11, 1971) was an officer in the United States Marine Corps. Puller is the most decorated U.S. Marine in history, and the only Marine to receive five Navy Crosses.</i></p>
<p>and waht did i get? a person named cha cha who wants to know if he was gay&#8230; why? because the more they can make taht way, the more the lgbt can claim dadt as an issue. </p>
<p>not only that, but when a real conflict happens, the women in military will insure that the one that can hold out longest will win, as a long war will need children (as known in history)</p>
<p>if you want you can read about the process of ligitimizing through social engineering things as an arbitrary thing&#8230; </p>
<p>how about the other side&#8230; social engineering a false dialogue as to womens chauvanism being valid to get more of them to give their lives to science (and as ayn rand said, give up their responsiblity to themselves and family for a stranger and a lie). </p>
<p>you can read the feminists trying to credit Mileva as the math behind einstein&#8230; </p>
<p>while compeltely ignoring the obituary he wrote for emmy noether crediting her! </p>
<p>why? </p>
<p>because the mileva story follows the social engineered answer which they feel will enduce a certain believe which grants them power as long as its beleived, not refuted, and the innocents clubs follow it as if it was real </p>
<p>they went so far as to make a film &#8220;einsteins life&#8221;<br />
becasue we learn more about a false reality we belive is real through TV (as the frankfurt schoolw as so quick to latch on to and send people to hollywood)</p>
<p><i>In 2003 the prestigious Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in the United States broadcast the documentary “Einstein’s Wife”, with extensive website material to accompany the programme. The documentary purports to provide viewers with the facts about the supposed contributions that Einstein’s first wife Mileva MariÄ‡ made to his work. Before I discuss the documentary itself, it is worth noting that the blurb on the DVD box indicates that reliable information is unlikely to be a feature of the programme:</p>
<p><b>“MariÄ‡, a brilliant mathematician, collaborated with [Einstein] on three famous works: Brownian Motion, Special Relativity Theory and Photoelectric Effect, which won the Nobel Prize for physics in 1921.”</b></i></p>
<p>so another example of pushing down the inconvenient truth, teaching a lie, and estabilshing a new truth at a new level which if believed changes the natural direction of the subject under social engineered control (which is deemed to be more efficient than OVERT slavery &#8211; as the slaves never realize their condition and so cant rebel having no ideas).  </p>
<p><i>The contention that MariÄ‡ was a brilliant mathematician is erroneous. Although she consistently achieved high grades in mathematics at school, this is not the case for her diploma course at Zurich Polytechnic. On the contrary, in the final diploma exam in 1900 her grade in the maths component was less than half that of any of the other four candidates, and it was largely due to this poor result that she failed the exam</i></p>
<p>another example of a women in college when they were not allowed&#8230; </p>
<p>the TRUTH is that they DID underperform the men.. </p>
<p>which is why today we keep the performig men out of academia so that we can fix the numbers!!! </p>
<p>you can read how a white, jewish, or chinese student has to get a higher score to beat out a lower scored woman, or race candidate&#8230; </p>
<p>that is, the equal people get in on a score 100 points or more less than the less equal people. </p>
<p><i>The contention that MariÄ‡ was a brilliant mathematician is erroneous. Although she consistently achieved high grades in mathematics at school, this is not the case for her diploma course at Zurich Polytechnic. On the contrary, in the final diploma exam in 1900 her grade in the maths component was less than half that of any of the other four candidates, and it was largely due to this poor result that she failed the exam</i></p>
<p>again&#8230; lets raise up the mediocre as great<br />
and where do we erase the great?</p>
<p>Emmy Noether<br />
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Noether</p>
<p><b>Amalie Emmy Noether, German pronunciation: [Ëˆné¸ËtÉ], (23 March 1882 — 14 April 1935) was an influential German mathematician known for her groundbreaking contributions to abstract algebra and theoretical physics. Described by David Hilbert, Albert Einstein and others as the most important woman in the history of mathematics,[1][2] she revolutionized the theories of rings, fields, and algebras. In physics, Noether&#8217;s theorem explains the fundamental connection between symmetry and conservation laws.[3]</b></p>
<p>so why dont we know her? </p>
<p>for the same reason we dont know ADA and someone like you believes that turing did things he didnt. the TIMELINE shows it to be impossible. </p>
<p><i>She was born to a Jewish family in the Bavarian town of Erlangen; her father was the mathematician Max Noether. Emmy originally planned to teach French and English after passing the required examinations, but instead studied mathematics at the University of Erlangen, where her father lectured. After completing her dissertation in 1907 under the supervision of Paul Gordan, she worked at the Mathematical Institute of Erlangen without pay for seven years. In 1915 she was invited by David Hilbert and Felix Klein to join the mathematics department at the University of Gé¶ttingen, a world-renowned center of mathematical research. The philosophical faculty objected, however, and she spent four years lecturing under Hilbert&#8217;s name. Her habilitation was approved in 1919, allowing her to obtain the rank of privatdozent.</i></p>
<p>for a time that was said not to allow women to be educated, i sure find the very few who all were educated and by great universities and such!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>how to resolve this quandry?<br />
either the progressive feminsits are lying to their constituency for personal gain, muich to the ruin of their constituency&#8230; </p>
<p>or, the right are even more devious, and were able to anticipate their assault, and plant all these false women and histories to be foudn and so confound the truth of femnism, progressivism, and the soviet, i mean American way!!! </p>
<p>so far every one of them were in college and with degrees and msot before the soviet revolution of 1917!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p><b>Noether remained a leading member of the Gé¶ttingen mathematics department until 1933; her students were sometimes called the &#8220;Noether boys&#8221;. In 1924, Dutch mathematician B. L. van der Waerden joined her circle and soon became the leading expositor of Noether&#8217;s ideas: her work was the foundation for the second volume of his influential 1931 textbook, Moderne Algebra. By the time of her plenary address at the 1932 International Congress of Mathematicians in Zé¼rich, her algebraic acumen was recognized around the world. The following year, Germany&#8217;s Nazi government dismissed Jews from university positions, and Noether moved to the United States to take up a position at Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania. In 1935 she underwent surgery for an ovarian cyst and, despite signs of a recovery, died four days later at the age of 53.</b></p>
<p>colleges here, colleges there&#8230; taught great men..<br />
made herself.. was Jewish&#8230; and so on.. </p>
<p>anyone see a trend that i do? </p>
<p>you wont see it if you dont knwo the history as it really is, but know it as they tell it to you in lies, and half truths. </p>
<p>type this phrase into google<br />
women were not allowed to go to college</p>
<p>6,790,000 results </p>
<p>Early College Women:<br />
Determined to be Educated<br />
<a href="http://www.northnet.org/stlawrenceaauw/college.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.northnet.org/stlawrenceaauw/college.htm</a>  </p>
<p>When the Women&#8217;s Rights Convention was held in 1848 in Seneca Falls, NY, one of the complaints documented in the Declaration of Sentiments was that &#8220;The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation&#8217;s on the part of man toward women, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. &#8230;He had denied her the facilities of a thorough education, all colleges being closed against her.&#8221; One of outcomes of the convention was a demand for higher education. </p>
<p>want to laugh?<br />
<b>The conveners of the Convention were justified in their complaint. Women did not have access to higher education before 1848. While a few women might attend a female seminary or academy, they were not allowed into colleges and universities. </b></p>
<p>the conveners of the convention went to college!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;a girl could study and learn, but she could not do all this and retain uninjured health, and a future secure from neuralgia, uterine disease, hysteria, and other derangements of the nervous system,&#8221; according to Dr. Edward Clark in his widely respected Sex and Education published in 1873.</p>
<p>but do the research.. </p>
<p>you will find that its mostly a careflly constructed lie based on half truths. </p>
<p>like a card house it only stands if you dont dig into it to see how they made it. </p>
<p>if you do, it falls apart, or you see the glue</p>
<p>return to the link i put up before</p>
<p>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women%27s_colleges_in_the_United_States</p>
<p>1742: Bethlehem Female Seminary: Founded in Germantown and later moved to Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. It received its collegiate charter in 1863 and in 1913, it became the Moravian Seminary and College for Women. In 1954, it merged with the male institution Moravian College and Theological Seminary and became the coeducational school, Moravian College [2] </p>
<p><b>1772: Little Girls&#8217; School (now Salem College): Originally established as a primary school, it later became an academy (high school) and finally a college. It is the oldest female educational establishment that is still a women&#8217;s college, and the oldest female institution in the Southern United States.</b></p>
<p>i thought they also claim that the southerners are dumb and hate women, and blacks? </p>
<p><b>Women did not have access to higher education before 1848</b></p>
<p>    * 1787: Young Ladies&#8217; Academy of Philadelphia [2]<br />
    * 1792: Litchfield Female Academy: Founded in Litchfield, Connecticut; it closed in 1833.<br />
    * 1814: Louisburg Female Academy (now Louisburg College): Founded in North Carolina; Louisburg Female College, founded in 1857. Later merged with Franklin Male Academy<br />
    * 1814: Troy Female Seminary: It became the Emma Willard School in 1895<br />
    * 1818: Elizabeth Female Academy: First female educational institution in Mississippi; it closed in 1843<br />
    * 1821: Clinton Female Seminary: Georgia. Forerunner to Wesleyan College [3]<br />
    * 1822: Athens Female Academy, now Athens State University. Athens, Alabama<br />
    * 1823: Hartford Female Seminary: It closed towards the later half of the 19th century<br />
    * 1827: The Linden Wood School for Girls (now Lindenwood University): Founded in St. Charles, Missouri; it became coeducational in 1969.<br />
    * 1828: Ipswich Female Seminary: It closed in 1878</p>
<p>all womens colleges and all before the meeting in ny claiming otherwise.. </p>
<p>and thats the US&#8230; it was only born less than 100 years bfore that, and had no socialism in its state and taxes to pay for women who could not pay themselves </p>
<p>AND THATS THE KEY as they are projecting todays new socialist normal to the past (as the do with morals to other things) and so the claim of no school leaves out NO STATE SCHOOLS under the control of a benificient state who gives things to special groups!!</p>
<p><b>Women did not have access to higher education before 1848</b></p>
<p>    * 1831: LaGrange Female Academy (now LaGrange College): Founded in LaGrange, Georgia, it became LaGrange Female College in 1851, and coeducational in 1953<br />
    * 1833: Columbia Female Academy (now Stephens College): Originally established as an academy (high school), it later became a college. It is the second oldest female educational establishment that is still a women&#8217;s college<br />
    * 1834: Wheaton Female Seminary (now Wheaton College, Massachusetts): Founded with the help of Mary Lyon; Wheaton became a college in 1912 and coeducational in 1987<br />
    * 1835: Livingston Female Academy and State Normal College (now University of West Alabama); It became coeducational in the 1950s<br />
    * 1836: Washington Female Seminary: closed in 1948<br />
    * 1836: Wesleyan College: Chartered as the Georgia Female College on December 23, 1836, Wesleyan is the world&#8217;s oldest women&#8217;s college. Still a women&#8217;s college<br />
    * 1837: Mount Holyoke Female Seminary (now Mount Holyoke College): It is the oldest (and first) of the Seven Sisters<br />
    * 1838: Judson Female Institute (Judson College (Alabama)): Founded in Marion, Alabama, it became Judson College in 1903 and later Judson College<br />
    * 1839: Farmville Female Seminary Association (now Longwood University): Founded in Farmville, Virginia; it became coeducational in 1976.</p>
<p><b>Women did not have access to higher education before 1848</b></p>
<p>havent even reached 1848 yet..<br />
its kind of turning out to be a manufactured history to suuport a manufactured truth, that then raises peoples false conciousness to move for them. </p>
<p>    * 1840: Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College<br />
    * 1841: Academy of the Sacred Heart (now Manhattanville College)<br />
    * 1842: Fulton Female Academy (now Synodical College): Founded in Fulton, Missouri, it closed in 1928<br />
    * 1842:Valley Union Seminary (now Hollins University): Established in Roanoke, Virginia as a coeducational school, it became a school for women in 1852, and was renamed Hollins Institute in 1855, Hollins College in 1911, and Hollins University in 1998<br />
    * 1842: Augusta Female Seminary (now Mary Baldwin College): Founded in Staunton, Virginia, it became the Mary Baldwin Seminary in 1895, and the Mary Baldwin College in 1923<br />
    * 1844: Saint Mary&#8217;s College (Indiana): Founded by the Sisters of the Holy Cross<br />
    * 1845: Limestone Springs Female High School: (now Limestone College) Founded in Gaffney, South Carolina, it began accepting a few male students in the 1920s (who did not live on campus) and became fully coeducational in the late 1960s<br />
    * 1846: Greensboro Female College: Charted in 1838 in Greensboro, North Carolina; it is now the coeducational school Greensboro College<br />
    * 1846: Illinois Conference Female Academy: It is now the coeducational school, MacMurray College<br />
    * 1847: Kentucky Female Orphan School (now Midway College): The school&#8217;s day program on its main campus remains all-female to this day. However, it offers coeducational programs on evenings and weekends at several satellite locations around Kentucky, as well as online. It will open a coeducational pharmacy school at a separate campus in 2011.<br />
    * 1847: Academy of Mount Saint Vincent: (now College of Mount Saint Vincent). Founded by the Sisters of Charity of New York; moved from Manhattan to current Riverdale, Bronx site in the 1850&#8217;s and began service as degree-granting, four-year liberal arts college in 1911. Became coeducational in 1974.<br />
    * 1848: Philadelphia School of Design for Women (now Moore College of Art and Design): It is the first and only art school which is a women&#8217;s college<br />
    * 1848: Chowan Baptist Female Institute; it is now the coeducational school Chowan University<br />
    * 1848: Drexel University College of Medicine: It is now, after several changes including becoming co-ed, Drexel University&#8217;s College of Medicine</p>
<p>have to stop now&#8230; i reached the end of the colleges that were created for women&#8230; </p>
<p>which dont exist.. </p>
<p>and from higher learning<br />
WOMEN AND THE ACADEMY<br />
beatl.barnard.columbia.edu/learn/timelines/women.htm</p>
<p>and here is waht they teach the girls were teh colleges opportunitie for women </p>
<p>notice that the place is columbia, home of the TEACHERS college and franfurt school of social engineering. </p>
<p>1636 to l830s &#8212; Several dozen colleges founded, none with provisions for training women; similar pattern in Europe</p>
<p>1833 &#8212; Oberlin College opened and shortly thereafter began enrolling women, becoming the1st co-educational college in United States</p>
<p>1836 &#8212; Mary Lyon opened Mount Holyoke Female Seminary to prepare young women for the foreign missions; school not designated a college until 1880s</p>
<p>1836 &#8212; Georgia Female College chartered</p>
<p>1839 &#8212; Georgia Female College opened as a women’s college</p>
<p>hey! columbias and teachers college list is smaller than mine&#8230;  </p>
<p>you think that if they use their list to teach the women mibht actually believe that they werent allowed?  </p>
<p>of course.. </p>
<p>i always wondered how my grandmother was able to be a researcher as i sat in school being told she couldnt have the education she did.. </p>
<p>do you know Margaret Cavendish?<br />
why not? </p>
<p>she was like ADA&#8230; on the political right and aristocracy as the left socialists paint the spectrum</p>
<p><b><br />
Women who wanted to work in science lived in Germany, but came from a different background. There, the tradition of female participation in craft production enabled some women to become involved in observational science, especially astronomy. Between 1650 and 1710, women made up 14% of all German astronomers</b></p>
<p>thats more than later&#8230; but thenagain, the measure of normal is the plight of a baby boom mother!!!! who wanted to give up these thigns for family&#8230; </p>
<p>which is why if you compare numbers before the boom and during the boom and after, you learn the lie is founded on a big decline of women participation as the century turned&#8230; </p>
<p>and the socialists siezed upon this as a social crisis, and the big money guys and their children joined the lets adminsitrate everyones life party!!! </p>
<p>so if you get the details, you will find that more women went to college late 1800s and early 1900s than went druing the 40s through the 60s.. [they were doing other things they wanted until someone confinced them what they wanted was to be state mules for tax largess]</p>
<p><i>Marie Curie, the first woman to win a Nobel prize in 1903 (physics), went on to become a double Nobel prize winner in 1911 (chemistry), both for her work on radiation.</p>
<p>Lise Meitner played a major role in the discovery of nuclear fission. As head of the physics section at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin she collaborated closely with the head of chemistry Otto Hahn on atomic physics until forced to flee Berlin in 1938. In 1939, in collaboration with her nephew Otto Frisch, Meitner derived the theoretical explanation for an experiment performed by Hahn and Fritz Strassman in Berlin, thereby demonstrating the occurrence of nuclear fission.</p>
<p>The Erlangen program attempted to identify invariants under a group of transformations. On July 16, 1918, before a scientific organization in Gé¶ttingen, Felix Klein read a paper written by Emmy Noether, because she was not allowed to present the paper before the scientific organization herself. In particular, in what is referred to in physics as Noether&#8217;s theorem, this paper identified the conditions under which the Poincaré group of transformations (what is now called a gauge group) for general relativity defines conservation laws. Noether&#8217;s papers made the requirements for the conservation laws precise. Moreover, among mathematicians Noether is best known for her fundamental contributions to abstract algebra, where the adjective noetherian is nowadays commonly used on many sorts of objects.</p>
<p>Inge Lehmann, a Danish seismologist, first suggested that the inside the Earth&#8217;s molten core there may be a solid inner core in 1936.</p>
<p>Women such as Margaret Fountaine continued to contribute detailed observations and illustrations in botany, entomology, and related observational fields.</i></p>
<p><b>so tell me now i dont know!!!!!!!!!!!</b></p>
<p>College Freshmen In US And China: Chinese Students Know More Science Facts But Neither Group Especially Skilled In Reasoning<br />
<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090129140840.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090129140840.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226917</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226917</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[david foster... 

i have been a computer scientist since high school at bronx sciecne on their mainframe... that was in the 70s..  back then turings work was less than 30 years old... as was the machine he worked on. 

&lt;i&gt;.Turing developed the theoretical superstructure of computer science, which was done without benefit of any actual computers to run programs on. &lt;/i&gt;

no.. your wrong on this,. and i tried to show you and hint at it. RATHER than read, look, check, you decide to plow on.. (and someone else decided to key in their chant with an i dont know when i DO know)

i pointed out that there is a decidedly progressive movment to sublimate heterosexuals or christians, and uplift gays and islam (and secularists)

so back years ago, we had it described who did what first... but since babage never built his infernce engine, the progressives decided to denude him of his place... 

and since ada lovelace was not a feminist, like emmy noether, they erased her contribution too. 

did you decide to scratch deeper than progressive hostoricist rewriting of history. 

OR

did you decide to keep saying the same thing your progressive teachers taught you? 

NOW PAY ATTENTION SON.. 

when was alan turing born? 
&lt;b&gt;Born, 23 June 1912&lt;/b&gt;

yes? easy fact.. yes? 


Ada Lovelace
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelace#First_.22computer_program.22
First &quot;computer program&quot;

now.. pay attention to the BOLDED PARTS... 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;b&gt;In 1842&lt;/b&gt; Charles Babbage was invited to give a seminar at the University of Turin about his analytical engine. Luigi Menabrea, a young Italian engineer, and future prime minister of Italy, wrote up Babbage&#039;s lecture in French, and this transcript was subsequently published in the Bibliothé¨que Universelle de Gené¨ve in October 1842.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

alan turing born 1912, babbage speech and the source of what a computer is, 1842... 

do you see a slight disparity here? 

dissonance anyone? 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Babbage asked the &lt;b&gt;Countess of Lovelace&lt;/b&gt; to translate Menabrea&#039;s paper into English, subsequently requesting that she augment the notes she had added to the translation. 

Lady Lovelace spent most of a year doing this. &lt;b&gt;These notes, which are more extensive than Menabrea&#039;s paper, were then published in The Ladies&#039; Diary and Taylor&#039;s Scientific Memoirs under the initialism &quot;AAL&quot;.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;

so we see the progressive lie as to education as well, and the progressive lie as to participation, and the progressive lie as to whether a gay man was the source, or a educated aristocratic woman of the right? 

see how this plays out... ADA was an aristocrat. educated and competent BEFORE progressivism (or rather while it was being concieved across the ocean). 

to ligitimize it, they rewrite the history... 

so women were not educated is the belief
but the truth was the people who had money did educate women and the first schools for them, like radcliffe (est 1879) were started way before the progressives social games (which even pre date marx)

see Timeline of women&#039;s colleges in the United States
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women%27s_colleges_in_the_United_States

the european ones predate them..  

but what you will find is that they are erased as this history is the history of the positivism of the christian church... so like palin with her religion, they dont exist or count. and like many soviet people, are being erased for bieng on he losing side of progressive history.
[edited for length by n-n]&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>david foster&#8230; </p>
<p>i have been a computer scientist since high school at bronx sciecne on their mainframe&#8230; that was in the 70s..  back then turings work was less than 30 years old&#8230; as was the machine he worked on. </p>
<p><i>.Turing developed the theoretical superstructure of computer science, which was done without benefit of any actual computers to run programs on. </i></p>
<p>no.. your wrong on this,. and i tried to show you and hint at it. RATHER than read, look, check, you decide to plow on.. (and someone else decided to key in their chant with an i dont know when i DO know)</p>
<p>i pointed out that there is a decidedly progressive movment to sublimate heterosexuals or christians, and uplift gays and islam (and secularists)</p>
<p>so back years ago, we had it described who did what first&#8230; but since babage never built his infernce engine, the progressives decided to denude him of his place&#8230; </p>
<p>and since ada lovelace was not a feminist, like emmy noether, they erased her contribution too. </p>
<p>did you decide to scratch deeper than progressive hostoricist rewriting of history. </p>
<p>OR</p>
<p>did you decide to keep saying the same thing your progressive teachers taught you? </p>
<p>NOW PAY ATTENTION SON.. </p>
<p>when was alan turing born?<br />
<b>Born, 23 June 1912</b></p>
<p>yes? easy fact.. yes? </p>
<p>Ada Lovelace<br />
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelace#First_.22computer_program.22<br />
First &#8220;computer program&#8221;</p>
<p>now.. pay attention to the BOLDED PARTS&#8230; </p>
<blockquote><p>
<b>In 1842</b> Charles Babbage was invited to give a seminar at the University of Turin about his analytical engine. Luigi Menabrea, a young Italian engineer, and future prime minister of Italy, wrote up Babbage&#8217;s lecture in French, and this transcript was subsequently published in the Bibliothé¨que Universelle de Gené¨ve in October 1842.
</p></blockquote>
<p>alan turing born 1912, babbage speech and the source of what a computer is, 1842&#8230; </p>
<p>do you see a slight disparity here? </p>
<p>dissonance anyone? </p>
<blockquote><p>
Babbage asked the <b>Countess of Lovelace</b> to translate Menabrea&#8217;s paper into English, subsequently requesting that she augment the notes she had added to the translation. </p>
<p>Lady Lovelace spent most of a year doing this. <b>These notes, which are more extensive than Menabrea&#8217;s paper, were then published in The Ladies&#8217; Diary and Taylor&#8217;s Scientific Memoirs under the initialism &#8220;AAL&#8221;.</b>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>so we see the progressive lie as to education as well, and the progressive lie as to participation, and the progressive lie as to whether a gay man was the source, or a educated aristocratic woman of the right? </p>
<p>see how this plays out&#8230; ADA was an aristocrat. educated and competent BEFORE progressivism (or rather while it was being concieved across the ocean). </p>
<p>to ligitimize it, they rewrite the history&#8230; </p>
<p>so women were not educated is the belief<br />
but the truth was the people who had money did educate women and the first schools for them, like radcliffe (est 1879) were started way before the progressives social games (which even pre date marx)</p>
<p>see Timeline of women&#8217;s colleges in the United States<br />
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women%27s_colleges_in_the_United_States</p>
<p>the european ones predate them..  </p>
<p>but what you will find is that they are erased as this history is the history of the positivism of the christian church&#8230; so like palin with her religion, they dont exist or count. and like many soviet people, are being erased for bieng on he losing side of progressive history.<br />
[edited for length by n-n]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: T		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226916</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226916</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hugh Downs?

If I remember correctly Hugh Downs never hosted jeopardy, that was Art Fleming.

Don Pardo, on the other hand, served as the off screen voice for virtually every game show ever telecast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh Downs?</p>
<p>If I remember correctly Hugh Downs never hosted jeopardy, that was Art Fleming.</p>
<p>Don Pardo, on the other hand, served as the off screen voice for virtually every game show ever telecast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LAG		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226904</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LAG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is doing until it’s too late.&quot; (Seymour Cray) 

And it seems I missed this earlier, &quot;engineers from the University of Southampton have developed what they say is the world’s first control system for programing satellites to think for themselves&quot;

http://www.gizmag.com/sysbrain-allows-satellites-to-act-autonomously/17899/

Combined with Watson, you can see where this leads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is doing until it’s too late.&#8221; (Seymour Cray) </p>
<p>And it seems I missed this earlier, &#8220;engineers from the University of Southampton have developed what they say is the world’s first control system for programing satellites to think for themselves&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gizmag.com/sysbrain-allows-satellites-to-act-autonomously/17899/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.gizmag.com/sysbrain-allows-satellites-to-act-autonomously/17899/</a></p>
<p>Combined with Watson, you can see where this leads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SteveH		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226876</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Given boundless time, which 13 billion years arguably amounts to, it seems almost inconcievable that we are the lone pioneers in creating animated intelligence. I&#039;d be neither hurt or offended to discover we are indeed products of such technological experiments before us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given boundless time, which 13 billion years arguably amounts to, it seems almost inconcievable that we are the lone pioneers in creating animated intelligence. I&#8217;d be neither hurt or offended to discover we are indeed products of such technological experiments before us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Casca		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I miss Hugh Downs and Don Pardo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss Hugh Downs and Don Pardo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Smith		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226826</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2011/02/17/watson-and-jeopardy-computer-vs-people/#comment-226826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Art, wouldn&#039;t it have been easier to say, &quot;I don&#039;t know&quot; and move on?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art, wouldn&#8217;t it have been easier to say, &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; and move on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
