http://crockettlives.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/from-here-to-grandiosity/

Bob Mack runs a good Blog and I commend him.

Humayun, the son of Babar, was even more degenerate and cruel than his father. After repeated battles, Humayum captured his elder brother Kamran and subjected the latter to brutal torture. A detailed account is left by Humayun’s servant Jauhar and is quoted by Smith (p.20), which says, ” .. (Humayun) had little concerns for his brother’s sufferings .. One of the men was sitting on Kamran’s knees. He was pulled out of the tent and a lancet was thrust into his eyes .. Some lemon juice and salt was put into his eyes .. After sometime he was put on horseback.” One can imagine the cruelty and torture that Humayun was capable of inflicting on others when he subjected to his own brother to such atrocities. Humayun was also a slave to opium habit, engaged in excessive alcohol consumption and a lecherous degenarate when it came to women (Shelat, p.27). He is also known to have married a 14 year old Hamida Begum by force. The cruelties perpetrated by of Akbar’s descendants (Jehangir, Shahjahan, Aurangzeb, etc.) are not entirely different from those of his ancestors. Having brought up in the company and under the guidance of a lineage of drug addicts, drunkards and sadists, it is rather anamalous that Akbar held such a gentle and noble character. Even assuming that he fancied nobility, it is amazing that Akbar let his comtemporaries and Generals, like Peer Mohammad, loot and rape the helpless citizenry that he was ruling! It would however be interesting to observe the incidents in Akbar’s reign and evaluate his character.
http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/modern/akbar_ppg.html

‘No Indian can deny the importance of efforts put in by Sat Guru Ram Singh Ji seventy five years back in achieving freedom for the motherland. Congress merely followed the path shown by him and attained independence.’ – India’s first Prime Minister, 1947.
http://www.panjabilok.net/punjabi-millennium/namdhari-sikhs-pioneers.php

Acknowledging Sat Guru Ram Singh Ji’s contribution and achievement in the freedom movement Dr Rajendera Prasad India’s first President wrote:

‘ In fact it is a historical truth that the non-co-operation and Swadishi movement started by Sat Guru Ram Singh Ji shook the very foundations of the British rule in India. Guru Ram Singh considered political freedom a part of religion. The principles of boycott and non-co-operation which Mahatma Gandhi introduced so vigorously in our freedom movement were expounded by Guru Ram Singh Ji for the Namdharis.’

Needless to say Gandhi’s experiment with Islam failed. The results were disastrous for both Hindus and Muslims. In the first place since the movement understood nothing about the dynamics of Turkish politics and nationalism it was bound to fail — the time of Sultans was over. In 1922 there was violence and Gandhi withdrew his support for the movement. Now let us take a look at the consequences of support to this Islamic movement:-
http://islamicterrorism.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/why-gandhis-experiment-with-islam-failed/

A blatant falsehood , Sir! I’m pretty sure he knows about curry. And, umm… elephants and… stuff?

See Tammy Bruce’s blog for details and the visitor log that Michelle and Barrack Hussein signed. 🙂

Certainly there is no chance of that approach to teaching in the U.S. Not while the public schools and the universities are owned and operated by the Left. Outright indoctrination is the only thing you’ll get from those people.