i am familiar with wiskys place..

here is another similar place, you may be surprised…

Guys,

I finally found it! I found the essay I was looking for-yes! This is good stuff, stuff that needs to be shared with my readers. Enjoy…

markymarksthoughts.blogspot.com/2009/03/artfldgr-on-sexual-harassment-laws.html

Marky has several articles of mine from mens news daily when i was there, and when i was doing more journalism work..

[still waters run deep and one thing you cant do with me is make any assumptions… ]

i have a large fan base that follows me from site to site while i am there… HI GUYS!!!!!!

they are usually silent but write me letters.. 🙂

12 March 2009
Artfldgr on Feminists’ Reaction to Seduction Book
Guys,

Though he often made long posts (many of which were too long to read due to my busy schedule), Art had lots of good things to say. Here, he talks about feminists’ panning a seduction book, why these books are popular, the rise of players, and how courtship broke down, thanks to the feminists demonization of men. Here’s the deep, profound message that Art shared with us back in September of 2005, which is why I’m posting it here. Enjoy!

markymarksthoughts.blogspot.com/2009/03/artfldgr-on-feminists-reaction-to.html

i also have articles on energy, phyics, biology, philosophy, sensors, design, adn more…

if you see the movie ADAM

you are looking at a person with aspergers
i have a lot of the best qualities without the more serious negatives. i am no regimented, i am not disliking of change, i am not literal, i understand jokes. etc.. i am not a victim, and can be very social.

what negs i do have is inability to negotiate with a VC in a competitive contract, so i cant get my work backed.

i am completely isolated from the world who has put me in solitary confinment for being different. by the way, the most verbal about tolerance are the most intolerant.

people envy my abilities, but they would never pay the price to ahve them… when you see ADAM, note how his life is one big empty thing.

then note, that in that he knows the world better than the other people!!!!!

i wouldnt trade if for the world. but being disenfranchised from research or engineering (wrong sex, race, and orientation), means that i am underpaid for my skills, warehoused, and victimized.

which is why i do all this stuff…
its like leonardo da vinci, einstein, etc..

you guys only got to hear of me and my writing because i move to where i can be most useful

not where i am the most popular, i care not as i dont need people, i could live in a lighthouse or go to mars and not have another person around for a year and not mentally go down like regular people. also, there is no place for me in a socialist state of equals.

I also stopped with the feminist stuff after they decided that they couldnt win the debate given who they were debating, and so they decided to find where i lived…

[and thats why i dont have my own site, my own blog, etc… its scary to have strangers angry at you show up where you live at night to suppress you with the implied implications]

if you look around, you can find all kinds of stuff i have written under artfldgr…

always known for being long
always known for triple periods…

now if i could only do something with the technology, the art, the drawings paintings, etc…

but alas… today the work of a person like ramanujan goes in teh garbage, and the rest of the world jumps on you if you try to connect. if you dont try, your in solitary confinement, if you do try, your an arrogant tall poppy that needs to be cut down.

be lucky if a bus hits me… 🙂

same outcome…

Neo is right, good candidates not only will fare better during the campaign mudbath, but hopefully will perform well enough once in office to hold the seat until such time as they may move to an even more prominent stage. Rubio and Nikki Haley were excellent candidates who were able to weather all that the degenerate Democrats could throw at them. And Ron Johnson of Wisconsin may turn out to be a bright star in the party, even though he was overlooked in most of the national media coverage.

Now is the time, for better or for worse, when we can longer worry about how it sounds, for what Whiskey is saying is, from my beta-male wonky poly sci perspective, essentially true.

This is why from the first days of Rubio’s campaign to win the GOP nomination I thought he was the only one who could defeat Obama. (and even he would have trouble, since in the weird world of identity politics, black trumps hispanic, and Cubans are not considered “real” hispanics).

But anyway, the upshot of Whiskey’s analysis concerns Republican women, and the sad truth is that, as Shelby Steele once said of Obama, they “cannot win.” There are some exceptions which would be interesting to get a better understanding of – Kelly Ayotte, as noted, and of course Michelle Bachmann. Ayotte is especially interesting because she won a Senate seat, not a House seat or a governorship (like Nikki Haley). Chances are it’s just a fluke, an exception to the rule. Ayotte also managed to escape the national spotlight, largely flying her campaign under the radar. That was probably the most important factor.

The whole thing is another double-bind placed on conservatives by the leftist narrative. They say, “You have no blacks;” Republicans then nominate blacks; and then they lose to white liberals almost every time. Then the left says, “See, you have no blacks…”

They do the same thing with women (it’s a big thing in poly sci departments to study the reasons for the “underrepresentation” of women in politics, and especially conservative politics). “You have so few women…;” Republicans nominate a bunch of women; they lose to white male liberals; and then it’s back to, “See, you have no women…”

It’s infuriating. We need to take Whiskey’s advice and get the YNWAM (Young Non-White Alpha Male) presence in the party front and center – and, see… just listen to how terrible that sounds, exactly like the left, identity politics, etc. But if that is the reality, then we have to call it as it is.

Fortunately the problem seems to be cabined in national offices – the Presidency and the Senate. Unfortunately, these are the toughest places to make real changes in voter habits.

rickl, I think it is probably cattiness. Women are often groupies, and if they see a woman who is outside the group, they gang up on her. Maybe it is some kind of survival instinct?

Check out Whiskey’s article, and feel free to leave your own comment there, if you’re so inclined.

I think Artfldgr might find it interesting, too.

One of the bad things about cultural feminism is that it produces a society where women never question their own motives. If women are always automatically good, then what point is there to thinking critically about why women do certain things.

For fun I sometimes take cooking classes, and recently one of my female classmates complained that the kitchen was poorly laid out, saying “this must have been designed by a man.” Excuse me??? Like women are never capable of designing crappy things?

It is not that much fun to be one of the only women on earth that actually thinks about this stuff, as you can well imagine I am sure.

If you couldn’t see from day one that Christine O’Donnell was a flawed candidate, then you don’t get it either.

Of course she was a flawed candidate. Can you name a flawless candidate? Harry Reid? Nancy Pelosi? Barney Frank? Joe Biden? Charles Rangel? Chuck Schumer?

I can go on in that vein for hours. But they are all multi-term winners who can apparently stay in elected office as long as they want or until they die, whichever comes first.

Someone this AM said that they actually did better than than they had any reason to expect. The numbers given were something like 113 TeaParty candidates that won out of 139 (not sure of this number) that were Tea Party endorsed.

If that’s a true statement, it’s pretty good success.

(6) The emergence of Republican women and minorities is one of the many pleasures of this election.

I agree wholeheartedly. I’m not the only one who has noticed the rise of many excellent conservative women candidates. As a man, I’m overjoyed and I’m proud to support them.

But they didn’t do so well last night. I left the following comment at Belmont Club after another commenter pointed out that O’Donnell did very poorly among women voters:

46. peterike
Women even voted against O’Donnell 61/36 (accd to exit polls). Irksome.

I call it disgusting.

The 19th Amendment continues to be problematic for me. I’d support repeal, but then superb candidates like Palin, Bachmann, and Haley, as well as decent candidates like O’Donnell and Angle probably wouldn’t be in the running. And there have been many, many women doing grunt work on the ground in the Tea Party movement.

Why do so many women voters vote against good women candidates? Cattiness? I don’t get it. I’m at a loss.

Whereupon another commenter directed me to ex-Belmont Club commenter Whiskey’s extensive analysis, at his own blog:

The Election Results: Go Hunk, Avoid Women

Read the whole thing. I hate to say it, but I think he pretty much nails it. If he’s right, it does not bode well for our future.