In 2007, I was a low-information typical woman democratic voter. I bought what the LSM peddles. Then I became interested in the primaries and checked out BO who I instantly (yes instantly) marked as an NPD. I know NPD because my dad was one and I spent several years studying it in order to fend him off. Right away I could see the implications of an NPD president and it scared the **** out of me. It was then that both my political awakening and political involvement began. Never would have believed I would end up within 2 years shunning LSM, studying up on conservatism, and sending monetary support to republican candidates.

Now, as to democratic dirty tricks. Is it morally impure to know and understand what those tricks are? How will you stop them if you refuse to know what they are doing, with whom and how? What will that get you? Whipped, that’s where.

On the other hand, it is a separate thing to say that DuJan is encouraging his readers to employ the same tricks. As a hillbuzz reader I disagree. He is hardly advocating, for example, vote fraud. He is much more interested in busting vote fraud by raising awareness that these things do go on and need to be documented. The Left is constantly doing the elephant in the living room dysfunctional family trick of pressuring people to disbelieve in reality.

But if I go to a dem survey and fill it out in a misleading fashion, or if I join OFA and claim to make calls, or claim to have certain ‘organizing’ successes or find other ways to actively undermine them, well, so sorry. I always admired Odysseus’s wits. One could split hairs over how he handled the Cyclops and whether it was morally pure – all the way until monster lunchtime. By monster lunchtime you will be on the menu and on his timetable and your chance to act will have passed.

. . . and woke up with MR HYDE!

I know how he feels. I had the same sickening feeling when I realized in 2001, even before the Muslim massacres, that the Demos, my then-party, were willing to burn down the nation’s trust in our election system to the ground, all to one of their guys into the White House.

That enraged me. It didn’t make me a Republican, though. That took a few more shocks: seeing their Quisling behavior after Sept. 11th, seeing them sheath the Racism sword for only a month, tops, before drawing it again, and so forth and so on.

I realized I didn’t have any idea who I’d been sleeping with. Here I thought they were good guys who were taking care of the little fellow, protecting our animal friends, and ensuring that the fanatical Puritans didn’t recriminalize abortion.

I suspect that this fellow won’t be a conservative, but he may be marooned between the boats.

🙂

And yes, as someone who was a liberal until the 2008 Presidential primaries and has now ONLY voted for Republicans since then, political conversion is possible. Do they still view Hillary with rose colored glasses? Yes, but even that may change. They say that in a race between Palin and Hillary they would go with Palin.

As far as being “catty” yes, they can be sometimes. That would describe a number of gay men I know and like-and no, I don’t know them personally. That would make them like some women I know-and even some men. There ought to be a masculine equivalent to “catty”.