Comments on: Those “demonic” Obama photos

By: rickl

rickl — Thu, 21 Oct 2010 07:32:07 +0000

Nixon didn’t look totally deranged.

And he wasn’t a Communist.

By: J.L.

J.L. — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:53:34 +0000

No, no, no... Obama isnt Nixon, nor Steve Urkel... He's Tuvok , from Star Trek Voyager

By: Baklava

Baklava — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:26:37 +0000

http://www.infowars.com/will-americans-follow-french-example-of-mass-civil-unrest/

By: Adrian Day

Adrian Day — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:55:58 +0000

I thought of Steve Urkel.

By: nyomythus

nyomythus — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:04:04 +0000

Ha! I thought Nixon too.

By: Beverly

Beverly — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:53:32 +0000

Aw, Jon, I’m not in the mood to extend “fairness” to The Vicious Party.

E-nuff. Gloves off!

By: Tom

Tom — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:30:51 +0000

I beg to differ with Neo, and find her comparison unreasonable. The visual evidence does not persuade me.
Obama=Mugabe.

By: Granny Jan

Granny Jan — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:30:21 +0000

jon, the pictures of Bush were goofy ones. The demonic ones were photoshopped.

The fact that the camera is always on him should make BHO more aware of his facial expressions. He is a deeply angry man and can no longer even hide it very well.

By: Kelly

Kelly — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:29:59 +0000

In the photo montage of Obama, the upper right photo puts me in mind of of how Al Gore looked during his famous melt down speech (THEY PLAYED ON OUR FEARS), minus the drooling.

By: jon baker

jon baker — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:03:57 +0000

In all fairness, if you followed any of us around long enough taking pictures, there would be some strange facial expressions. The other side did this to Bush.