<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What&#8217;s the next Congress to do with HCR?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ritchie Emmons		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/#comment-193404</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ritchie Emmons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/#comment-193404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s not forget that HCR was passed using the underhanded &quot;Reconciliation&quot; process. Quite frankly, I think it&#039;s perfectly legitimate to repeal the law in the same manner. No need to require 60 votes in the Senate.

If I were the Rs, I&#039;d try to defund everything in the bill except for any provisions that may be politically dangerous to defund (if there are any). All this for a build up for repeal after the 2012 elections. 

The cherry on top would be that Obama would be so profoundly repudiated. A very humiliating blow for someone that has as much self-regard as he has.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget that HCR was passed using the underhanded &#8220;Reconciliation&#8221; process. Quite frankly, I think it&#8217;s perfectly legitimate to repeal the law in the same manner. No need to require 60 votes in the Senate.</p>
<p>If I were the Rs, I&#8217;d try to defund everything in the bill except for any provisions that may be politically dangerous to defund (if there are any). All this for a build up for repeal after the 2012 elections. </p>
<p>The cherry on top would be that Obama would be so profoundly repudiated. A very humiliating blow for someone that has as much self-regard as he has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob From Virginia		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/#comment-193403</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob From Virginia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/#comment-193403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Frankly in today&#039;s economy the 26 year old child is not unusual.  we have one who is a Phd student and cannot afford her insurance.  

the rest of HCR as far as I know is intended to do as much damage to the US as possible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly in today&#8217;s economy the 26 year old child is not unusual.  we have one who is a Phd student and cannot afford her insurance.  </p>
<p>the rest of HCR as far as I know is intended to do as much damage to the US as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barb the Evil Genius		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/#comment-193349</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barb the Evil Genius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/#comment-193349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When I remarked on my blog how ridiculous parents keeping kids on their insurance until age 26 was, I had one mom come crying to me how her daughter has ad asthma since she was 9, and since she was diagnosed so young, she will never, ever, ever, be able to afford insurance on her own because the pre-existing thing means she can&#039;t afford or even get insurance. But then you&#039;re just a big meanie for arguing with them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I remarked on my blog how ridiculous parents keeping kids on their insurance until age 26 was, I had one mom come crying to me how her daughter has ad asthma since she was 9, and since she was diagnosed so young, she will never, ever, ever, be able to afford insurance on her own because the pre-existing thing means she can&#8217;t afford or even get insurance. But then you&#8217;re just a big meanie for arguing with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nolanimrod		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/#comment-193334</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nolanimrod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/10/18/whats-the-next-congress-to-do-with-hcr/#comment-193334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First we must define our terms. What I called &lt;em&gt;Insurance&lt;/em&gt; they now call &lt;em&gt;Catastrophic Coverage&lt;/em&gt; and act like it&#039;s insufficient.

And let&#039;s stop pretending we&#039;re talking about &lt;em&gt;Insurance&lt;/em&gt; for &lt;em&gt;Pre-existing Conditions&lt;/em&gt;. When the probability is 1.0 that ain&#039;t insurance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First we must define our terms. What I called <em>Insurance</em> they now call <em>Catastrophic Coverage</em> and act like it&#8217;s insufficient.</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s stop pretending we&#8217;re talking about <em>Insurance</em> for <em>Pre-existing Conditions</em>. When the probability is 1.0 that ain&#8217;t insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
