<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Democrats or Republicans: does the difference make a difference?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:39:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PJ		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-187710</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-187710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Frankly, elections may not stop them, since Obama has accomplished much of his agenda by Executive Order.  In the Senate, waiting for a vote, is the CLEAR ACT.  This bill is the total giveaway of US sovereignty. The bill doesn&#039;t say it is giving our sovereignty away, but it refers to an executive order signed by Obama, which bypasses congress and enables the takeover of US waterways, the airspace above and surrounding the waterways, and the land and all minerals over to the UN for governance.  This bill takes away congressional oversight by giving appropriation of monies, without having to go through congress EVER AGAIN, which is basically another blank check. Only this time, the money is being given to the UN.  It also creates three new agencies to oversee enactment.  Please study the CLEAR ACT and Obama&#039;s executive order pertaining to the LOST treaty. They go hand in hand to devastate the US.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, elections may not stop them, since Obama has accomplished much of his agenda by Executive Order.  In the Senate, waiting for a vote, is the CLEAR ACT.  This bill is the total giveaway of US sovereignty. The bill doesn&#8217;t say it is giving our sovereignty away, but it refers to an executive order signed by Obama, which bypasses congress and enables the takeover of US waterways, the airspace above and surrounding the waterways, and the land and all minerals over to the UN for governance.  This bill takes away congressional oversight by giving appropriation of monies, without having to go through congress EVER AGAIN, which is basically another blank check. Only this time, the money is being given to the UN.  It also creates three new agencies to oversee enactment.  Please study the CLEAR ACT and Obama&#8217;s executive order pertaining to the LOST treaty. They go hand in hand to devastate the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183917</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183917</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The basic symbolic interactionist proposition at the heart of labeling theory is that the formation of an
individual’s identity is a reflection of others’ definition of him or her. The theory advances the thesis
that individuals who are labeled or dramatically stigmatized as deviant are likely to take on a deviant
self-identity and become more, rather than less, deviant than if they had not been so labeled. … An
ironic, unintended consequence of labeling, therefore, is that the person becomes what the
sanctioning process meant to prevent, even if he or she did not set out that way. RONALD L. AKERS,
Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation, 1994.

&quot;You Fascist!!!!&quot;


life is a corrupting process from the time a child learns to play his mother off against his father in the
politics of when to go to bed; he who fears corruptions fears life. SAUL ALINSKY (1909-1972), Rules
for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Radicals, 1971.


Seductiveness may be characterized as the polar opposite of nurturance, which indicates
hopefulness, the belief that if you are open, trusting, and giving, there is a real chance that instead of
being exploited, your actions will be reciprocated. …It is understandable, therefore, that the seductive
personality will search for and tend to gauge potential partners in terms of their weakness, inferiority,
and vulnerability to being exploited. GERALD ALPER, The Puppeteers: Studies of Obsessive Control,
1994.


&lt;b&gt;The typical citizen drops down to a lower level of mental performance as soon as he enters the
political field. He argues and analyzes in a way he would readily recognize as infantile within the
sphere of his real interests. He becomes a primitive again. JOSEPH A. SCHUMPETER (1883-1950),
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 1950.&lt;/b&gt;

Mass behavior is associated with activist interpretations of democracy and with increasing reliance on force to resolve social conflict. … The breakdown of normal restraints, including internalized
standards of right conduct, and established channels of action … frees the mass to engage in direct,
unmediated efforts to achieve its goals and to lay hands upon the most readily accessible
instruments of action. PHILIP SELZNICK, The Organizational Weapon, 1952.

The result of a narcissistic version of reality is that the expressive powers of adults are reduced.
They cannot play with reality, because reality matters to them only when it in some way promises to mirror intimate needs. RICHARD SENNETT, The Fall of Public Man, 1976.


&lt;b&gt;“Boredom: the desire for desires”&lt;/b&gt; Tolstoy

“Life swings like a pendulum backward and forward between pain and boredom” Schopenhauer


“I&#039;ve got a great ambition to die of exhaustion rather than boredom.” Carlyle... 

&lt;b&gt;“Your true traveller finds boredom rather agreeable than painful. It is the symbol of his liberty - his excessive freedom. He accepts his boredom, when it comes, not merely philosophically, but almost with pleasure.”&lt;/b&gt; Aldous Huxley

“The life of the creative man is lead, directed and controlled by boredom. Avoiding boredom is one of our most important purposes.” Sontag

&lt;b&gt;“Is boredom anything less than the sense of one&#039;s faculties slowly dying?”&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The basic symbolic interactionist proposition at the heart of labeling theory is that the formation of an<br />
individual’s identity is a reflection of others’ definition of him or her. The theory advances the thesis<br />
that individuals who are labeled or dramatically stigmatized as deviant are likely to take on a deviant<br />
self-identity and become more, rather than less, deviant than if they had not been so labeled. … An<br />
ironic, unintended consequence of labeling, therefore, is that the person becomes what the<br />
sanctioning process meant to prevent, even if he or she did not set out that way. RONALD L. AKERS,<br />
Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation, 1994.</p>
<p>&#8220;You Fascist!!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>life is a corrupting process from the time a child learns to play his mother off against his father in the<br />
politics of when to go to bed; he who fears corruptions fears life. SAUL ALINSKY (1909-1972), Rules<br />
for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Radicals, 1971.</p>
<p>Seductiveness may be characterized as the polar opposite of nurturance, which indicates<br />
hopefulness, the belief that if you are open, trusting, and giving, there is a real chance that instead of<br />
being exploited, your actions will be reciprocated. …It is understandable, therefore, that the seductive<br />
personality will search for and tend to gauge potential partners in terms of their weakness, inferiority,<br />
and vulnerability to being exploited. GERALD ALPER, The Puppeteers: Studies of Obsessive Control,<br />
1994.</p>
<p><b>The typical citizen drops down to a lower level of mental performance as soon as he enters the<br />
political field. He argues and analyzes in a way he would readily recognize as infantile within the<br />
sphere of his real interests. He becomes a primitive again. JOSEPH A. SCHUMPETER (1883-1950),<br />
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 1950.</b></p>
<p>Mass behavior is associated with activist interpretations of democracy and with increasing reliance on force to resolve social conflict. … The breakdown of normal restraints, including internalized<br />
standards of right conduct, and established channels of action … frees the mass to engage in direct,<br />
unmediated efforts to achieve its goals and to lay hands upon the most readily accessible<br />
instruments of action. PHILIP SELZNICK, The Organizational Weapon, 1952.</p>
<p>The result of a narcissistic version of reality is that the expressive powers of adults are reduced.<br />
They cannot play with reality, because reality matters to them only when it in some way promises to mirror intimate needs. RICHARD SENNETT, The Fall of Public Man, 1976.</p>
<p><b>“Boredom: the desire for desires”</b> Tolstoy</p>
<p>“Life swings like a pendulum backward and forward between pain and boredom” Schopenhauer</p>
<p>“I&#8217;ve got a great ambition to die of exhaustion rather than boredom.” Carlyle&#8230; </p>
<p><b>“Your true traveller finds boredom rather agreeable than painful. It is the symbol of his liberty &#8211; his excessive freedom. He accepts his boredom, when it comes, not merely philosophically, but almost with pleasure.”</b> Aldous Huxley</p>
<p>“The life of the creative man is lead, directed and controlled by boredom. Avoiding boredom is one of our most important purposes.” Sontag</p>
<p><b>“Is boredom anything less than the sense of one&#8217;s faculties slowly dying?”</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Stripped of ethical rationalizations and philosophical pretensions, a crime is anything that a group in
power chooses to prohibit. FREDA ADLER, Sisters In Crime, 1975.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stripped of ethical rationalizations and philosophical pretensions, a crime is anything that a group in<br />
power chooses to prohibit. FREDA ADLER, Sisters In Crime, 1975.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183910</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They always give advice, want to do everything themselves, find new dangers and never rest until the
other person, confused and discouraged, confides himself to their care. … The neurotic aspires to
make the laws for the others. ALFRED ADLER (1870-1937), “The Function of Neurotic Symptoms,” in
The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler, 1956.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They always give advice, want to do everything themselves, find new dangers and never rest until the<br />
other person, confused and discouraged, confides himself to their care. … The neurotic aspires to<br />
make the laws for the others. ALFRED ADLER (1870-1937), “The Function of Neurotic Symptoms,” in<br />
The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler, 1956.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183909</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183909</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is a well-known fact that those people who want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to
do it….anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be
allowed to do the job. DOUGLAS ADAMS (1952-2001), The Restaurant at the End of the Universe,
1980.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a well-known fact that those people who want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to<br />
do it….anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be<br />
allowed to do the job. DOUGLAS ADAMS (1952-2001), The Restaurant at the End of the Universe,<br />
1980.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baklava		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183899</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baklava]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Scottie, 

Thank you sir. 

I will not see my assets and savings and hard work be flushed down the drain by somebody promoting so-called opportunity and positive ideas of a &#039;cliff&#039;.

Let&#039;s solve the problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scottie, </p>
<p>Thank you sir. </p>
<p>I will not see my assets and savings and hard work be flushed down the drain by somebody promoting so-called opportunity and positive ideas of a &#8216;cliff&#8217;.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s solve the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SteveH		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183877</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;&quot; I win not by chipping at his great bulk, but by helping him along in the direction he wants to travel.&quot;&quot;
Foxmarks

 Judo isn&#039;t practical in real life, just in demonstrations. The UFC is proof of that by being dominated by guys who basically just know how to pound the hell out of some judo master&#039;s head.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221; I win not by chipping at his great bulk, but by helping him along in the direction he wants to travel.&#8221;&#8221;<br />
Foxmarks</p>
<p> Judo isn&#8217;t practical in real life, just in demonstrations. The UFC is proof of that by being dominated by guys who basically just know how to pound the hell out of some judo master&#8217;s head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scottie		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183873</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scottie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Baklava,

&quot;The only people who benefit from the cliff are a few - not families who have had “PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY” over the years.&quot;

Exactly! The world foxmarks is advocating is not a world I want my kids or their kids to have to grow up dealing with.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baklava,</p>
<p>&#8220;The only people who benefit from the cliff are a few &#8211; not families who have had “PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY” over the years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly! The world foxmarks is advocating is not a world I want my kids or their kids to have to grow up dealing with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: IgotBupkis		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183863</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IgotBupkis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Keep in mind, you need &lt;b&gt;FULL&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generally_Accepted_Accounting_Principles_%28United_States%29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GAAP&lt;/a&gt;, not just a &quot;balanced budget&quot; requirement. 

A balanced budget requirement doesn&#039;t mean squat when your budget doesn&#039;t have to be anything but bogus made up numbers and associations.

Example:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;The federal government does not adhere to GAAP -- generally accepted accounting principles. Nor does it use independent accountants. In other words, politicians, not accountants, decide how to keep track of the federal government&#039;s financial affairs.
 But politicians, like the rest of us, tend to follow the path of least resistance in pursuing their self-interests. It is a lot easier to cook the books a little than it is to make hard political choices on taxes and spending.
That&#039;s why a balanced budget amendment would not reduce the deficit; it would result in a lot of cooked books, instead.
 Just consider New York State, whose government in more ways than one is the federal government writ small. Like many states, New York has a constitutional requirement that its expense budget be balanced. But in 1992 Albany found itself $200 million short of that mandate. Did the legislature and the governor raise taxes or cut spending? Certainly not. The state of New York simply sold Attica Prison to itself.
 I am not making this up. The Urban Development Corporation, a state agency established to help redevelop troubled urban areas, borrowed in the bond market, turned the money over to the state, and took title to the prison. The state, in turn, recorded the $200 million its own agency had borrowed as income, proclaimed the budget balanced, and now rents Attica from the UDC.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
 - John Steele Gordon -

&lt;b&gt;Clearly, without GAAP, a balanced budget is effectively worthless when it comes to controlling the chicanery the government can get up to.&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind, you need <b>FULL</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generally_Accepted_Accounting_Principles_%28United_States%29" rel="nofollow">GAAP</a>, not just a &#8220;balanced budget&#8221; requirement. </p>
<p>A balanced budget requirement doesn&#8217;t mean squat when your budget doesn&#8217;t have to be anything but bogus made up numbers and associations.</p>
<p>Example:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;The federal government does not adhere to GAAP &#8212; generally accepted accounting principles. Nor does it use independent accountants. In other words, politicians, not accountants, decide how to keep track of the federal government&#8217;s financial affairs.<br />
 But politicians, like the rest of us, tend to follow the path of least resistance in pursuing their self-interests. It is a lot easier to cook the books a little than it is to make hard political choices on taxes and spending.<br />
That&#8217;s why a balanced budget amendment would not reduce the deficit; it would result in a lot of cooked books, instead.<br />
 Just consider New York State, whose government in more ways than one is the federal government writ small. Like many states, New York has a constitutional requirement that its expense budget be balanced. But in 1992 Albany found itself $200 million short of that mandate. Did the legislature and the governor raise taxes or cut spending? Certainly not. The state of New York simply sold Attica Prison to itself.<br />
 I am not making this up. The Urban Development Corporation, a state agency established to help redevelop troubled urban areas, borrowed in the bond market, turned the money over to the state, and took title to the prison. The state, in turn, recorded the $200 million its own agency had borrowed as income, proclaimed the budget balanced, and now rents Attica from the UDC.&#8221;</i><br />
 &#8211; John Steele Gordon &#8211;</p>
<p><b>Clearly, without GAAP, a balanced budget is effectively worthless when it comes to controlling the chicanery the government can get up to.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: IgotBupkis		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183862</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IgotBupkis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/09/01/democrats-or-republicans-does-the-difference-make-a-difference/#comment-183862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another thing that needs to be considered is that one of the chief reasons for the current problem is that the government is not bound by GAAP.

Almost all the current fiscal issues come from that.

If you want a major way to fix this flaw in the original system, it would be to constitutionally require all government, state, local, and federal  -- to be done using GAAP rules for all accounting practices.

The amount of sheer, inarguable chicanery that would be tossed right out would be a huge benefit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing that needs to be considered is that one of the chief reasons for the current problem is that the government is not bound by GAAP.</p>
<p>Almost all the current fiscal issues come from that.</p>
<p>If you want a major way to fix this flaw in the original system, it would be to constitutionally require all government, state, local, and federal  &#8212; to be done using GAAP rules for all accounting practices.</p>
<p>The amount of sheer, inarguable chicanery that would be tossed right out would be a huge benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
