Thank you! Your formatting, and use of paragraph breaks, really does make a huge difference.

respectfully,
Daniel in Brookline

despots are a product of the modern state, they are administrators, not warriors.

he has exactly what it is to be a dictator.
including a large cadre of administrators and functionaries to make his court work his way over the rules they were hired for.

hitler took power when?
how long before Gleichschaltung

war comes next, which is why the other states are guearing up. to them, we are going to be a hitler with the military of the US… so even on the outside chance he succeeds what comes next?

and do remember, you need to borrow to pay for war, and we are broke. no money, no bullets, no country.

the progressives plans were started in an era were we were isolated by a large ocean and lack of technology.

now, that isnt so,and their plans and things have not changed. NONE of them say anything about maintaining a miltary to hold off outsiders while the state collapses and you reform it.

they think that these others are just going to sit there and let it all happen.

THANKS!!

never claimed to have perfect knowledge..
and i do appreciate correction when valid

For others
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Peace/jerutime.html

638 was the END of byzantine Christians
and the start of the first Muslim period.

Sorry, the only way Obama will ever be a dictator will be the day he stuffs the front of his jockey shorts with mashed potatoes. Hell, almost two years into his Presidency Firefox is still giving that red mis-spelled word squiggly underline to his name.M

well, amoral people are not generally competent. being amoral makes up for it…

one has to understand collective leadership pretending to mimic and appear as something else.

for instance, every main candidate in the last election was a progressive and a CFR member.

this is collective leadership. they are all friends, and they just let you decide which of the friends in the group will run things.

not much different than the African tribe that selects strangers to judge their altercations and such. in this way, the stranger isnt even swayed by understanding any issues or such. somehwhere out there is a documentary in which this happned during filming and he was to select after a story theater of things, who gets the goat.

they dont care which of the 10 of them takes the drivers seat this turn… they all share in the spoils regardless.

Sorry, the only way Obama will ever be a dictator will be the day he stuffs the front of his jockey shorts with mashed potatoes. Hell, almost two years into his Presidency Firefox is still giving that red mis-spelled word squiggly underline to his name.

The Hussites were Protestants. A few of them are still around.

Rather than get too detailed I would like to mention one particular item. In 638 the Moslems did not take Jerusalem from the Jews but from the Byzantines.

The last Jewish controlled state before Israel was in Yemen in the 500s. It was destroyed by the Ethiopians acting with Byzantine support well before the rise of Islam.

Guess which Neo Neoconski is into obscure Jewish history?

I’m not sure what you mean about how soft President Obama is acting.

It’s just acknowledging the fact that a dictator has a choice between the bare iron hand, or the velvet glove. That many focus on trivialities as their deterministic point. In this way, they never see what it is. By definition that would be now not to grok something.

He can seize power, and if he is soft, as in Aldous Huxley in brave new world, we might not realize he is a dictator. We will just think he is a bureaucrat or an administrator who is just doing their organizational job.

Hollywood never transmits actual functional knowledge and tends to start all stories at a point that hides the real how. Others just bury it all in hard facts and leave out all abstractions.

Of course this is what I am battling against. And ignorant is ignorant; there is no polite way to put it. However those that are ignorant should realize that if I felt I was really superior to their ability, I would say stupid not ignorant.

Stupid is a condition that one can’t cure. The slight difference means a very big thing, even if the people offended don’t get it!

To call one stupid is to say they don’t even have the capacity to learn even if presented with the information, and to actually stand above them in taunt. To call one ignorant is to say you haven’t learned, and it assumes the capacity to learn what is being said. It only suggests a lack of experience, something that can easily be cured. ESPECIALLY if the person pointing it out gives you a reference to it and expects you to climb up and join them as an equal in knowledge.

One can’t belay another from below
[I am referring to where the anchor is, not the person]

Like taking penicillin, you can either accept you have syphilis and take it, or pretend you don’t have it, get pissed off at the person suggesting you have it and storm out.

The only one that suffers the outcome is you.

To really realize that they carefully selected the information that most know without questioning it. Is to realize that your knowledge may have big holes in it.

If you go ask the man on the street about jack boots and dictators and you will most likely never get someone to tell you the real deal. They ALSO will not tell you they don’t know, they will just make up something.

It takes a certain amount of moral honor and real understanding to admit not knowing, taking the lesser position, and then allowing one to be lifted to a state of equal knowing and standing (rather than spit on them)

And guess what? To know as much as I do, you have to do that an awful lot.
People are vain and you can pick their brains easily from the lower place

If you cant accept the truth, then your going to have to live with this form of mental syphilis which causes craters just like the real one, and causes mental dysfunction (in terms of your life and your goals, not theirs).

I will let you in on a big secret…

Totalitarian despots are not military men; they are not warriors or even anywhere near them. They may know the knowledge of such, but they are not such. They are not emotional passionate people, except to whom they perform for by spooning their information into mouths made accustomed by the ease of such (which forces them to turn away from the harder truth).

What they are is cold clinical administrators….

Philip Dru Administrator : a Story of Tomorrow 1920 – 1935 by House
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/6711

Philip Dru tell the story of a military and political genius who took over a wealthy disordered quarrelsome nation and led it into an era of superhuman contentment by persuading the people to make him their supreme autocrat. This vision was not very different from Woodrow Wilson’s view of how things worked best politically.

They applied Dru’s methods to the problem of reaching their goals.

And the tools do not define who is using them (other than some tools are only used by certain kinds not certain specifics)… this is important since when you describe a famous thing from history that used that tool, people associate that as part of it as a defining quality. And so the false argument is that they argue over whether a screwdriver (nationalization) is an indicator.

They alighted on and focused on their goals, from being friends and close associates of certain people whose free thinking and other ideas gave them licentious license and so, tempted them to make the world that way. It also brought them the great success that they think they have, but great temporary success is not really what they wanted.

In the year 2010, the student and the statesman saw many indications
that the social, financial and industrial troubles that had vexed the
United States of America for so long a time were about to culminate in
civil war.

The laborer in the cities, the producer on the farm, the merchant, the
professional man and all save organized capital and its satellites, saw
a gloomy and hopeless future.

Why not the people and something else? because if you read these older texts you find that later on they experimented and tried things, and so… the young impressionable student molded by the statesman’s control of education are the ones in line together creating a feedback loop.

To quote some other post.
Wilson lacked the STRUCTURE to enforce his desires. Totalitarian plans without STRUCTURE (without effective administrative control – subverting if not destroying all alternative centres of power) are just day dreams in the end.
It has taken the Progressives (non-Marxist, such as Wilson, and Marxist) more than a century to build the structure they need.
They have been plotting global socialism and executing it for centuries…
And if you don’t think that’s possible, let me clue you in on another project that has been going on for millennia.
Starting with the Death of Muhammad (A.D. 632)
633, they acquired Mesopotamia
635 Damascus
638 they take Jerusalem from the Jews
645 they take Alexandria
649 they take cypress
673 they attack Constantinople
693 Whole of Christian North Africa conquered
711 they invade Spain
721 Saragossa falls
732 then Poitiers
734 then Avignon
743 then Lyons
813 then they sacked the Port of Rome
826 they war with Crete till 961
837 Naples was then sacked
838 then Marseilles
842-859 its Sicily
846 Rome was sacked again.
870 the island of Malta
Just 223 more year till the first response to all this…
878 Syracuse falls taking almost a year and committing genocide (word not invented yet)
889 then Toulon (North Italy)
902 they sacked and destroyed Thessaly, in Central Greece
935 Genoa was attacked
976 Fresh expeditions into Italy
1010 Cosenza (Southern Italy) fell
1015 Sardinia
In 1017, Mujahid bin ‘Abd Allah (Muslim ruler in Sardinia) sent the Pope a message saying he would attack in the Spring. Rather than waiting, the Pope took the battle to him and when Benedict arrived in Sardinia he found Mujahid crucifying Christians. Mujahid fled.
From this point on, the continuous altercations had the term crusade
First Crusade 1095-1099
Siege of Jerusalem in 1099
Crusade of 1101
Norwegian Crusade 1107-1110
Second Crusade 1147—1149
Third Crusade 1187—1192
Fourth Crusade 1202—1204
Albigensian Crusade
Children’s Crusade
Fifth Crusade 1217—1221
Sixth Crusade 1228—1229
Seventh Crusade 1248—1254
Eighth Crusade 1270
Ninth Crusade 1271—1272
Northern Crusades
Swedish Crusades
Wendish Crusade
Stedinger Crusade
Aragonese Crusade
Alexandrian Crusade
Mahdian Crusade
Crusades in the Balkans
Crusade against the Tatars
Hussite Crusade

The whole thing, we are taught ended, with the siege on Vienna
That is in 1683 they bypassed the very strong French, and went after Vienna
[The French let them. the poles pushed them out, and France grabbed lands!]

The date? September 11, 1683

The latest Crusade attack? September 11, 2001

Yes, some struggles have been going on for a long long time
What makes anyone think that if they have been doing it since 632, and its 2010, the game is no longer valid?

Even worse, what makes people think that the people who beat them back, also have not been playing similar long term games to take control of the new country America.

To think that they have ONLY been working for 200 years and that’s irrelevant
Is to ignore that Islam has been working since 632, and have not stopped either