<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Obama the great bamboozler	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:49:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: House of Eratosthenes		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176247</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[House of Eratosthenes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Neo-Neocon: One of the most perverse things about Obama is that, when he’s trying to get tough with the opposition, what he says about them is often the best clue to what he’s actually doing, or planning to do. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Neo-Neocon: One of the most perverse things about Obama is that, when he’s trying to get tough with the opposition, what he says about them is often the best clue to what he’s actually doing, or planning to do. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Don Rodrigo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Rodrigo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On Malcolm X:

The great tragedy of his life was that he was murdered when he started to mature and become conciliatory. He was killed to deliberately freeze him in time. The Malcolm X that African Americans celebrate is not the man he was becoming, but the man he was rejecting. That African Americans are tolerant or even admiring of the chief architect of his murder -- Louis Farrakhan -- while celebrating the false Malcolm X is an indictment of the African American community as an aggregate. Maybe someday they will feel the sting of shame and deign to join the greater American community.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Malcolm X:</p>
<p>The great tragedy of his life was that he was murdered when he started to mature and become conciliatory. He was killed to deliberately freeze him in time. The Malcolm X that African Americans celebrate is not the man he was becoming, but the man he was rejecting. That African Americans are tolerant or even admiring of the chief architect of his murder &#8212; Louis Farrakhan &#8212; while celebrating the false Malcolm X is an indictment of the African American community as an aggregate. Maybe someday they will feel the sting of shame and deign to join the greater American community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoffrey Britain		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176045</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey Britain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have to step away from this thread for a few hours, I&#039;ll return to check on any response but I&#039;ve said what I have to say and see nothing to be gained in engaging in what is certain to devolve into argument. 

I do wish Artfldgr well and appreciate his view, I simply disagree with some of his conclusions and object to the issues mentioned above.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to step away from this thread for a few hours, I&#8217;ll return to check on any response but I&#8217;ve said what I have to say and see nothing to be gained in engaging in what is certain to devolve into argument. </p>
<p>I do wish Artfldgr well and appreciate his view, I simply disagree with some of his conclusions and object to the issues mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoffrey Britain		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176043</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey Britain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;you want to be here to hear GB make up stuff?&quot;

Please substantiate your claim that I make &#039;stuff&#039; up. 

&quot;Seems to me that this pig doesn’t like to be taught to sing, and so the pig is being very pissed at the situation calling upon him to do what he cant do (so he goes to annoy me).&quot;
 
Labeling me a &#039;pig&#039;, even metaphorically is crossing the line. When have I ever called you, any name?

&quot;Why are you here at all GB? To be a Hux?&quot;
 
Disagreement as to view is my right is it not? Your implied denial of it and your attempt to categorize me as a “Hux&#039; is quite revealing.

&quot;I have a very good idea GB…&quot;
 
No, you don&#039;t and labeling me a Hux reveals that your emotions and ego are interfering with an objective evaluation.

&quot;Why don’t you take one of those posts you don’t like, and then show me how to do it sine your so superior. Or are you a critic? You know, one of those people who spend their time in armchair critiques of others to prevent others from looking too closely at you and all that you lack?  Go ahead smarty…&quot;
 
I&#039;m not the one claiming to be superior, you are and, attempting to paint me with the brush that applies to you is ironically, exactly what neo&#039;s post concerns. Falsely labeling a response to your denigration of Daniel and my comments as being a &#039;critic&#039; is disingenuous. 

Look at me all you want and being human, of course I &#039;lack&#039; certain qualities, as do you. I&#039;m not the one however, whose nose gets out of joint when criticized. In my experience, you always do and clearly illustrate someone who can dish it out but can&#039;t take it.

&quot;I CHALLENGE you. I challenge you to put up or shut up!!!!&quot;

I just did. Or do you require meeting at dawn with single shot pistols, to satisfy your &#039;honor&#039;?

&quot;Yes. Which if I was asking for advice in such a situation with someone I actually have access to and have a relationship with that might be great. But given we are talking about POTUS… your answer is freaking inane for everyone but senators, representatives, cabinet members, Gibbs, the press corps, and assorted on camera talking heads!!!&quot;
 
I was talking about just those people and how they might respond to Obama&#039;s disingenuous. Which anyone reading the post and comments would understand. Falsely assigning me a claim to what I would personally do in such a situation is transparently disingenuous. Which makes your response the inane one. 

As for showing my &#039;chops&#039;... just making a comment isn&#039;t a reliable indicator of a desire to show off but your assuming it does, says much about you.

&quot;Let me first show you something as to how you think and how I think.. 
Your self focused ego assumes I have a self focused ego…&quot;

A &#039;self-focused ego&#039; is not my problem Artfldgr but clearly it is yours, as your own words confirm it for the fair-minded reader.

&quot;So you see what I am saying is “failure to appreciate”
When what I am saying is “failure to understand”&quot;

When someone uses semantics as rebuttal they reveal an inability to respond.

&quot;The funny part is you don’t get that your problem is that I don’t want to be loved, appreciated, feared, or anything along those puerile ego reasons.&quot;

Of course you do, ego frequently crops up in your missives and only self denial prevents you from acknowledging it, otherwise your frequent &#039;put downs&#039; of others, when they&#039;ve done nothing to offend and, your intimations that only you KNOW what&#039;s really going on... would stand out as self-evident beacons for the need for self-analysis.

&quot;I want people to understand the history so that they can make better choices and be more effective in their lives, and what I get is an adult who acts like a 14 year old smart ass who thinks it’s great to prevent others from learning, and to foul up his own edification with ego games.&quot;
 
All I did was object to a put down and illustrate through sarcasm, the underlying implications of your derogatory comments toward Daniel and I, when we weren&#039;t even addressing you. 

Claiming my motivation to be that of a &#039;14 yr old smartass&#039; who seeks to prevent others from learning (from the great fount of acumen that you are) and. who does so out of ego games is ludicrous to anyone familiar with my and your comments. I applaud any effort to offer insight, historical or otherwise, to expose and counter the negatives the left is attempting, it&#039;s your insistence that only your view has value wherein our disagreement lies.

&quot;You don’t get that if I lie to you, you will appreciate me more&quot;

You keep telling yourself that garbage and you&#039;ll never learn from others, only from the readings which align with your beliefs and their filters.

&quot;On some level I am [would be] lying abut my feelings, frustration, and my inability to get you to understand the history you don’t know.&quot;
 
I&#039;ve never asked you to lie nor would I, I don&#039;t even need you to be polite, I do object to your being needlessly derisive of others comments. Is that really so much to ask? 

If it is, then you&#039;re the one with the ego problem, not I.

I&#039;m quite willing to learn history I don&#039;t know, I &lt;i&gt;am&lt;/i&gt; unwilling to unthinkingly accept your conclusions as to the relevance and connections of that history to our present circumstances.

&quot;I have no hang ups, grudges, childhood bs to get over…&quot;
 
Everyone has issues  Artfldgr and, such a claim reveals a remarkable degree of self-denial.

&quot;I must have been mistaken…I thought you didn’t want to be stung by the hornets&quot;

Warn us all you want and believe it or not it will be and is appreciated. I&#039;ve never claimed you had nothing of value to contribute or even that it might not be of great value. 

My only problem with you Artfldgr is your frequent and condescending air when putting down others views, categorizing them as unsophisticated ignorance which, whether they are or not is uncalled for and counter-productive. There&#039;s no need to be insulting to people who are often sympathetic to your views... is there?

&quot;But some people have to play with the hornets nest to learn I am assuming that your one of them…&quot; 

We all have our lessons to learn, which includes you. Do you have any idea what they might be? Or is a man with &quot;no issues&quot; above all that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;you want to be here to hear GB make up stuff?&#8221;</p>
<p>Please substantiate your claim that I make &#8216;stuff&#8217; up. </p>
<p>&#8220;Seems to me that this pig doesn’t like to be taught to sing, and so the pig is being very pissed at the situation calling upon him to do what he cant do (so he goes to annoy me).&#8221;</p>
<p>Labeling me a &#8216;pig&#8217;, even metaphorically is crossing the line. When have I ever called you, any name?</p>
<p>&#8220;Why are you here at all GB? To be a Hux?&#8221;</p>
<p>Disagreement as to view is my right is it not? Your implied denial of it and your attempt to categorize me as a “Hux&#8217; is quite revealing.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have a very good idea GB…&#8221;</p>
<p>No, you don&#8217;t and labeling me a Hux reveals that your emotions and ego are interfering with an objective evaluation.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why don’t you take one of those posts you don’t like, and then show me how to do it sine your so superior. Or are you a critic? You know, one of those people who spend their time in armchair critiques of others to prevent others from looking too closely at you and all that you lack?  Go ahead smarty…&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the one claiming to be superior, you are and, attempting to paint me with the brush that applies to you is ironically, exactly what neo&#8217;s post concerns. Falsely labeling a response to your denigration of Daniel and my comments as being a &#8216;critic&#8217; is disingenuous. </p>
<p>Look at me all you want and being human, of course I &#8216;lack&#8217; certain qualities, as do you. I&#8217;m not the one however, whose nose gets out of joint when criticized. In my experience, you always do and clearly illustrate someone who can dish it out but can&#8217;t take it.</p>
<p>&#8220;I CHALLENGE you. I challenge you to put up or shut up!!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>I just did. Or do you require meeting at dawn with single shot pistols, to satisfy your &#8216;honor&#8217;?</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes. Which if I was asking for advice in such a situation with someone I actually have access to and have a relationship with that might be great. But given we are talking about POTUS… your answer is freaking inane for everyone but senators, representatives, cabinet members, Gibbs, the press corps, and assorted on camera talking heads!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>I was talking about just those people and how they might respond to Obama&#8217;s disingenuous. Which anyone reading the post and comments would understand. Falsely assigning me a claim to what I would personally do in such a situation is transparently disingenuous. Which makes your response the inane one. </p>
<p>As for showing my &#8216;chops&#8217;&#8230; just making a comment isn&#8217;t a reliable indicator of a desire to show off but your assuming it does, says much about you.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let me first show you something as to how you think and how I think..<br />
Your self focused ego assumes I have a self focused ego…&#8221;</p>
<p>A &#8216;self-focused ego&#8217; is not my problem Artfldgr but clearly it is yours, as your own words confirm it for the fair-minded reader.</p>
<p>&#8220;So you see what I am saying is “failure to appreciate”<br />
When what I am saying is “failure to understand”&#8221;</p>
<p>When someone uses semantics as rebuttal they reveal an inability to respond.</p>
<p>&#8220;The funny part is you don’t get that your problem is that I don’t want to be loved, appreciated, feared, or anything along those puerile ego reasons.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course you do, ego frequently crops up in your missives and only self denial prevents you from acknowledging it, otherwise your frequent &#8216;put downs&#8217; of others, when they&#8217;ve done nothing to offend and, your intimations that only you KNOW what&#8217;s really going on&#8230; would stand out as self-evident beacons for the need for self-analysis.</p>
<p>&#8220;I want people to understand the history so that they can make better choices and be more effective in their lives, and what I get is an adult who acts like a 14 year old smart ass who thinks it’s great to prevent others from learning, and to foul up his own edification with ego games.&#8221;</p>
<p>All I did was object to a put down and illustrate through sarcasm, the underlying implications of your derogatory comments toward Daniel and I, when we weren&#8217;t even addressing you. </p>
<p>Claiming my motivation to be that of a &#8217;14 yr old smartass&#8217; who seeks to prevent others from learning (from the great fount of acumen that you are) and. who does so out of ego games is ludicrous to anyone familiar with my and your comments. I applaud any effort to offer insight, historical or otherwise, to expose and counter the negatives the left is attempting, it&#8217;s your insistence that only your view has value wherein our disagreement lies.</p>
<p>&#8220;You don’t get that if I lie to you, you will appreciate me more&#8221;</p>
<p>You keep telling yourself that garbage and you&#8217;ll never learn from others, only from the readings which align with your beliefs and their filters.</p>
<p>&#8220;On some level I am [would be] lying abut my feelings, frustration, and my inability to get you to understand the history you don’t know.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never asked you to lie nor would I, I don&#8217;t even need you to be polite, I do object to your being needlessly derisive of others comments. Is that really so much to ask? </p>
<p>If it is, then you&#8217;re the one with the ego problem, not I.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite willing to learn history I don&#8217;t know, I <i>am</i> unwilling to unthinkingly accept your conclusions as to the relevance and connections of that history to our present circumstances.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have no hang ups, grudges, childhood bs to get over…&#8221;</p>
<p>Everyone has issues  Artfldgr and, such a claim reveals a remarkable degree of self-denial.</p>
<p>&#8220;I must have been mistaken…I thought you didn’t want to be stung by the hornets&#8221;</p>
<p>Warn us all you want and believe it or not it will be and is appreciated. I&#8217;ve never claimed you had nothing of value to contribute or even that it might not be of great value. </p>
<p>My only problem with you Artfldgr is your frequent and condescending air when putting down others views, categorizing them as unsophisticated ignorance which, whether they are or not is uncalled for and counter-productive. There&#8217;s no need to be insulting to people who are often sympathetic to your views&#8230; is there?</p>
<p>&#8220;But some people have to play with the hornets nest to learn I am assuming that your one of them…&#8221; </p>
<p>We all have our lessons to learn, which includes you. Do you have any idea what they might be? Or is a man with &#8220;no issues&#8221; above all that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Great Bamboozler - Transterrestrial Musings		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Great Bamboozler - Transterrestrial Musings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] thoughts on the president&#8217;s latest bit of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] thoughts on the president&#8217;s latest bit of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JohnC		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176028</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[time = thing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>time = thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JohnC		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176027</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Daniel in Brookline: Your and Geoffrey B&#039;s observations regarding Artfldgr&#039;s attitude and posts have been raised countless times by many over the past 2 to 3 years. I for one refuse to do the editing and organizing that he refuses to do. To hell with that. Of course, the trend is that after the emergence of a slew of complaints he&#039;ll tone down things and clean up his posts a little. But, within a few days he&#039;ll be back to his usual stuff. 

He lost me as a reader a long time ago. It&#039;s just very easy to scroll over his too long, disorganized, unedited rambles. And, I&#039;m not missing a time by doing so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel in Brookline: Your and Geoffrey B&#8217;s observations regarding Artfldgr&#8217;s attitude and posts have been raised countless times by many over the past 2 to 3 years. I for one refuse to do the editing and organizing that he refuses to do. To hell with that. Of course, the trend is that after the emergence of a slew of complaints he&#8217;ll tone down things and clean up his posts a little. But, within a few days he&#8217;ll be back to his usual stuff. </p>
<p>He lost me as a reader a long time ago. It&#8217;s just very easy to scroll over his too long, disorganized, unedited rambles. And, I&#8217;m not missing a time by doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel in Brookline		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176017</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel in Brookline]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Artfldgr, you mean well; that&#039;s clear.  But your condescension -- Geoffrey Britain was quite right -- does not gain you readers.  Nor do your attempts to insult people into action -- when you yourself cannot be bothered to proofread your own spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization.

(Normally we don&#039;t raise that issue; you&#039;ve explained before that this is very difficult for you.  But your calls to arms ring very hollow indeed, when it&#039;s clear that we are doing proofreading work that you&#039;re not.)

There&#039;s no question in my mind that you have a powerful (and important) message to deliver.  But that message will fall on deaf ears if it is rambling, unproofread, and insulting to boot.  (Neoneocon has occasionally done you the favor of condensing your messages, and has probably gotten you more readers thereby.  But she shouldn&#039;t have to do this for you.)

You can insist on writing the way you like to write, and bemoan the fact the hardly anybody listens to you.  Or you can take the trouble to organize your thoughts and your words, express them simply (and uncondescendingly)... and then have people spend more time discussing your ideas, rather than the way you chose to express them.  It&#039;s your call.

respectfully,
Daniel in Brookline]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artfldgr, you mean well; that&#8217;s clear.  But your condescension &#8212; Geoffrey Britain was quite right &#8212; does not gain you readers.  Nor do your attempts to insult people into action &#8212; when you yourself cannot be bothered to proofread your own spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization.</p>
<p>(Normally we don&#8217;t raise that issue; you&#8217;ve explained before that this is very difficult for you.  But your calls to arms ring very hollow indeed, when it&#8217;s clear that we are doing proofreading work that you&#8217;re not.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question in my mind that you have a powerful (and important) message to deliver.  But that message will fall on deaf ears if it is rambling, unproofread, and insulting to boot.  (Neoneocon has occasionally done you the favor of condensing your messages, and has probably gotten you more readers thereby.  But she shouldn&#8217;t have to do this for you.)</p>
<p>You can insist on writing the way you like to write, and bemoan the fact the hardly anybody listens to you.  Or you can take the trouble to organize your thoughts and your words, express them simply (and uncondescendingly)&#8230; and then have people spend more time discussing your ideas, rather than the way you chose to express them.  It&#8217;s your call.</p>
<p>respectfully,<br />
Daniel in Brookline</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SteveH		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176013</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;&quot;I am surprised, after reading 53 comments, that no one has remarked on how much Baraq speech resembles Jeremiah Wright’s.&quot;&quot;
Tom

 I&#039;ve noticed in radio interviews and such of Obama from a few years ago that his speech pattern sounded quite diferently. Theres definitely an evolution into a more wavering cadence that smacks of a black evangelical.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;I am surprised, after reading 53 comments, that no one has remarked on how much Baraq speech resembles Jeremiah Wright’s.&#8221;&#8221;<br />
Tom</p>
<p> I&#8217;ve noticed in radio interviews and such of Obama from a few years ago that his speech pattern sounded quite diferently. Theres definitely an evolution into a more wavering cadence that smacks of a black evangelical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: willis		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176003</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[willis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/08/04/obama-the-great-bamboozler/#comment-176003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Why you can’t even get drugs in Harlem without the White Man’s permission!

You can’t get prostitution in Harlem without the White Man’s permission!

You can’t get gambling in Harlem without the White Man’s permission!&quot;

When you can&#039;t even get a good education without studying with a passion.
When you can&#039;t raise successful children without setting an example of morality, integrity, dedication.
When you can&#039;t clean up your community without supporting the drug dealers, prostitutes, etc by not buying their wares.

I&#039;m waiting for that speech from the President.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why you can’t even get drugs in Harlem without the White Man’s permission!</p>
<p>You can’t get prostitution in Harlem without the White Man’s permission!</p>
<p>You can’t get gambling in Harlem without the White Man’s permission!&#8221;</p>
<p>When you can&#8217;t even get a good education without studying with a passion.<br />
When you can&#8217;t raise successful children without setting an example of morality, integrity, dedication.<br />
When you can&#8217;t clean up your community without supporting the drug dealers, prostitutes, etc by not buying their wares.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting for that speech from the President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
