Comments on: Sensing a tremor in the liberal force field

By: Steve G

Steve G — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 01:51:06 +0000

Occam’s Beard,
Hilary can’t slug it out with the Dope as she is intent on proving herself the loyal supporter of his agenda. She and Bill must rely on surrogates, like “disenchanted” liberals and the MSM, to make the case that they were right when they pointed out his lack of experience. He has to be induced to step aside. Only then can she step in by acclamation to the role of presidential candidate in 2012. Stranger things have happened and are continuing to happen. Timing is everything on this one!

By: Occam's Beard

Occam's Beard — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:11:12 +0000

There is nothing here of interest to conservatives, at least as yet.

I dunno, Steve. If Barry and Hillary decide to slug it out, who wins?

America, methinks.

By: Steve G

Steve G — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:54:41 +0000

Could this possibly be the Clintons at work, not only blessing a liberal take down of Obama (and opening a possible 2012 run by Hilary if Obama is deemed too unpopular to run again) but giving a pass to the MSM to unsheathe their daggers and, while stabbing the Dope in the back, giving Hilary a boost in the polls?

There is nothing here of interest to conservatives, at least as yet.

By: Wm Lawrence

Wm Lawrence — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:11:00 +0000

If we are forced to get serious about “redistributing” wealth then I vote we start with these hypocritical morons. Surely the contents of Barbra’s bank account will go further in bulking up the treasury and bribing Barry’s voters than mine…

If we’re going to have wealth redistribution let’s have REAL wealth redistribution starting with George Soros and working down through the Kennedys, Kerrys etc. and on to Hollyweird…

And if we are forced into a revolution let’s make it a french revolution. Wonder if old George would like a hair cut…?

By: Occam's Beard

Occam's Beard — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 02:48:47 +0000

Maybe Brolin and Babs were “blown away” because the speakers obviously ditched their blind-faith in Lord Obama.

I think the dominant motivation was to appear avant-garde, even at the cost of looking fickle and/or reactionary. Never underestimate the shallowness of performers. (Or perhaps I should say, never overstimate the profundity of performers. Their prime directive is to appear chic. All other considerations dwindle into insignificance.)

By: Occam's Beard

Occam's Beard — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 02:40:32 +0000

Artfldgr, no probs. In fact, it’s funny and telling that my parody was on its face indistinguishable from a serious liberal position. /g

OT: I placed a hold at the local library on Stanton Evans’s book re McCarthy and blacklisting, and found I was seventh on the list. Good sign, methinks!

By: Artfldgr

Artfldgr — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:49:53 +0000

Sorry occam..
i seldom look to who wrote what…
i am a content person. 🙂

sad part is that many would think that your logic that is fine, would stand up in the illogical world of liberal areas of law they have modified…

By: ethos

ethos — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:26:48 +0000

I dunno. Babs is a communist. She’s been a communist all her life. Maybe her romantic notion of communism just won’t materialize, and she’s finally waking up?

Maybe Brolin and Babs were “blown away” because the speakers obviously ditched their blind-faith in Lord Obama. Scary!

I’m having a hard time beleiving Streisand is no longer a bubble-dwelling elite communist.

By: Occam's Beard

Occam's Beard — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:12:26 +0000

Artfldgr, this:

we need to redirect more healthcare resources from women to men to close the egregious gap in longevity. Men have suffered from second-class healthcare status long enough.

was a joke, you know, for to laugh. It was a parody of liberal argumentation and faux concern. I understand the oppressor/oppressed dialectic; I was satirizing it. Sorry that wasn't clear.

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:16:23 +0000

LondonTrader: Yes, I’m aware of Ferguson and his work in general. The point I was trying to make (and perhaps did not make clear) was not about Ferguson but about the fact that he was invited there to speak at all, and the positive reactions of the liberal crowd to his message.