<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Krauthammer: on Obama&#8217;s internationalism	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 02:30:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: 2010 Blast to the Past &#124; Sake White		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-820537</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2010 Blast to the Past &#124; Sake White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 02:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-820537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144951 [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144951" rel="nofollow ugc">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144951</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NeoConScum		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-145155</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoConScum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-145155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Charles the Great, the subject of this thread, had some wonderful things to say tonight on Fox about the Gore-Bull Warmers. He, as usual, made his spot-on points in brief, paradoxical and humorous ways. A fine example of brevity and not one mention of himself. My hat&#039;s to Charles le Grande.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles the Great, the subject of this thread, had some wonderful things to say tonight on Fox about the Gore-Bull Warmers. He, as usual, made his spot-on points in brief, paradoxical and humorous ways. A fine example of brevity and not one mention of himself. My hat&#8217;s to Charles le Grande.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NeoConScum		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-145154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoConScum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-145154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Landlord, whom I like &#038; respect, has expressed her wishes and I shall obey to the limits of my ability to keep my oversensitive gag reflex for BS under restraint.

The inability to clear my Evil Neocon throat in under 8-paragraphs has never been a problem for me. Comprende?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Landlord, whom I like &amp; respect, has expressed her wishes and I shall obey to the limits of my ability to keep my oversensitive gag reflex for BS under restraint.</p>
<p>The inability to clear my Evil Neocon throat in under 8-paragraphs has never been a problem for me. Comprende?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-145067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-145067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Stupidity has no cure

Ignorance is curable

the choice is with the person with the condition

spreading the desease as a means of normalizing reality to hide the desease by making it appear normal. 

is not a cure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupidity has no cure</p>
<p>Ignorance is curable</p>
<p>the choice is with the person with the condition</p>
<p>spreading the desease as a means of normalizing reality to hide the desease by making it appear normal. </p>
<p>is not a cure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-145064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-145064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NeoConScum, 
  ever thought that acting like crazy king george is not a way to go through life making surface judgments. 

if you were smart as your snarky statements make clear you want us to believe. then they would work better if they were not trying to be taller by telling everyoen to get on their knees!!!

its marxian to think that neo and others should oversee reality and control it so it suits you. (this goes for others too). or that we should be homogenized to one set of ideas and limits as set by you and a few. by what right?  by what true need is this the way to go?  who told you that you were so special that you could make demands on others and offer nothing but the repreive of insults if such complies? 

think hard here...  

i dont bellittle you because you cant think.  i belittle you because you wont think and can.  big difference!!!!!!!!!!!

it gets your goat, but not enough to turn off the mechanisms of ignorance and have you stop a second and think beyond what the ignorant say that sounds more comforatable. 

I dont think the common man is a rube and such, and i can give reasons. the change from the 1950s and before when smart people were respected and regarded by the public created a social condition. since i didnt attend years and years of college and didnt have someone restricting my learning, i was out in the world, and i learned to LOVE the common man.

NeoConScum, there is a difference between REAL love and fake love. REAL love means i cant be dishonest to you. i have to be tough to you as i want the bigger picture to work out for you, and if that makes the short term miserable, then so be it. 

what you dont see is that this is not about my long posts and never was. its about the tall poppy.  its about the fact that you were raised to be superior for no reason. that is, you dont achieve in kind to your abilities. most dont even go out and try, giving up before that point. 

IDEOLOGY is about creating a false schema. a short cut of reasoning that those who wont think adopt. in this case, length of post as a means of determining value. is it a valid schema? cant the ideas attempting to justify it, make progress in a debate over the concept that short posts are always valuable, and long ones are just the result of a mental disorder? 

how nice, a mental view of the world that raises ignorance to supremecy, and intelligence, sacrifice, sharing and participation as a mental desease. who then has the mental desease that prevents learning?  the one who has learned, or the one who thinks that the product of learnign is a mental disorder? 

i would not bother with you if you couldnt do it. i dont sit in the park and teach birds politics. they dont understand, and i dont know their language. all you have accomplished with your post is to label yourself a luddite while attempting to put me in the camp of the elite. 

you arent angry at me because i get the girls in real life...  so thats not it. you arent angry at me because my intelligence bring me huge amounts of money... so thats not it.  you arent angry at me because you already know what i am saying and so its a waste of time... so thats not it. 

so why are you pavlovian trained to attack someone else that may have a skill or an ability that you dont have (and you percieve may give them an unequal advantage over you?)

&lt;b&gt;because i am willing to stand on my own, and not be a collectivist.&lt;/b&gt;

your whole set of posts not on the subject of the blog. not on even content of what i said. all just a soviet style rule that all posts should be X size, and that everyone should comply. if they dont, they are going to be punished by the self appointed social police and they will impose proper modes of allowed speech. 

and yet you call your self conservative. and yet you argue agaisnt such behavior.and yet, you do nothing but exibit the borgian mind of conformity to the colllective, rather than celebrate the value in our differnce. was your comment and such based on the &quot;character of my content&quot;?  (couldnt help the reverse pun)...

your abilities in writing say you have more potential ...start using it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NeoConScum,<br />
  ever thought that acting like crazy king george is not a way to go through life making surface judgments. </p>
<p>if you were smart as your snarky statements make clear you want us to believe. then they would work better if they were not trying to be taller by telling everyoen to get on their knees!!!</p>
<p>its marxian to think that neo and others should oversee reality and control it so it suits you. (this goes for others too). or that we should be homogenized to one set of ideas and limits as set by you and a few. by what right?  by what true need is this the way to go?  who told you that you were so special that you could make demands on others and offer nothing but the repreive of insults if such complies? </p>
<p>think hard here&#8230;  </p>
<p>i dont bellittle you because you cant think.  i belittle you because you wont think and can.  big difference!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>it gets your goat, but not enough to turn off the mechanisms of ignorance and have you stop a second and think beyond what the ignorant say that sounds more comforatable. </p>
<p>I dont think the common man is a rube and such, and i can give reasons. the change from the 1950s and before when smart people were respected and regarded by the public created a social condition. since i didnt attend years and years of college and didnt have someone restricting my learning, i was out in the world, and i learned to LOVE the common man.</p>
<p>NeoConScum, there is a difference between REAL love and fake love. REAL love means i cant be dishonest to you. i have to be tough to you as i want the bigger picture to work out for you, and if that makes the short term miserable, then so be it. </p>
<p>what you dont see is that this is not about my long posts and never was. its about the tall poppy.  its about the fact that you were raised to be superior for no reason. that is, you dont achieve in kind to your abilities. most dont even go out and try, giving up before that point. </p>
<p>IDEOLOGY is about creating a false schema. a short cut of reasoning that those who wont think adopt. in this case, length of post as a means of determining value. is it a valid schema? cant the ideas attempting to justify it, make progress in a debate over the concept that short posts are always valuable, and long ones are just the result of a mental disorder? </p>
<p>how nice, a mental view of the world that raises ignorance to supremecy, and intelligence, sacrifice, sharing and participation as a mental desease. who then has the mental desease that prevents learning?  the one who has learned, or the one who thinks that the product of learnign is a mental disorder? </p>
<p>i would not bother with you if you couldnt do it. i dont sit in the park and teach birds politics. they dont understand, and i dont know their language. all you have accomplished with your post is to label yourself a luddite while attempting to put me in the camp of the elite. </p>
<p>you arent angry at me because i get the girls in real life&#8230;  so thats not it. you arent angry at me because my intelligence bring me huge amounts of money&#8230; so thats not it.  you arent angry at me because you already know what i am saying and so its a waste of time&#8230; so thats not it. </p>
<p>so why are you pavlovian trained to attack someone else that may have a skill or an ability that you dont have (and you percieve may give them an unequal advantage over you?)</p>
<p><b>because i am willing to stand on my own, and not be a collectivist.</b></p>
<p>your whole set of posts not on the subject of the blog. not on even content of what i said. all just a soviet style rule that all posts should be X size, and that everyone should comply. if they dont, they are going to be punished by the self appointed social police and they will impose proper modes of allowed speech. </p>
<p>and yet you call your self conservative. and yet you argue agaisnt such behavior.and yet, you do nothing but exibit the borgian mind of conformity to the colllective, rather than celebrate the value in our differnce. was your comment and such based on the &#8220;character of my content&#8221;?  (couldnt help the reverse pun)&#8230;</p>
<p>your abilities in writing say you have more potential &#8230;start using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NeoConScum		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoConScum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My insensitive comments on Compulsive-Obsessive Bi-Polar NEED Disorder &quot;are awaiting moderation.&quot;
I, lowly knuckle dragging rube, apologize to the Landlord and the humble, yet giving Master of Learning &#038; Humility &#038; Massive Amounts of Blog Space.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My insensitive comments on Compulsive-Obsessive Bi-Polar NEED Disorder &#8220;are awaiting moderation.&#8221;<br />
I, lowly knuckle dragging rube, apologize to the Landlord and the humble, yet giving Master of Learning &amp; Humility &amp; Massive Amounts of Blog Space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144918</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[oh.. i leave it to those who would folow the link and watch the whole show to know what the kid says!!! 

its a bigger punchline that detriechs line as he comes out of the bathroom (i think. i havent seen it since the 70s... i can remember things to that detail)

now those that want to know ahve to watch 25 minute episode... 

just like in the posts above, to get to one quote, you had to read the 1300 pages of ONE history book and put up references to mroe than six, and was lambasted that i couldnt reduce 6 history books which each on average over 5 times the size of a entertainment book into 200 words. 

Das Kapitol is FOUR volumes long...

there are nine volumes to gramsci prison notebooks...  (vol 3 is 700 pages)


you guys have been taught to a 5th grade level

these guys wrote when 13th grade level was common and such writings were common in books for the young (like james fenimore coopers leatherstocking)

asking me to summarize them with references is basically asking me to make marx and all that stuff accessible to a 5th grader. 

 lei feng had a little red book, but his other writings could be used in battle. 

want to read lenins collected works? (as i have)
here is VOLUME 38
Lenin - Philosophical Notebooks, Volume 38 of the Collected Works
www.scribd.com/doc/4025775/Lenin-Philosophical-Notebooks-Volume-38-of-the-Collected-Works

660 pages for vol 38...  

mein kampf 694 pages


All of these would be required reading before being able to start debating the subject seriously. 

if you havent read them already in your life, then your not going to read them when i say to, as you have more than 40,000 pages just to get through lenin and then start on stalin. 

40,000 pages and you complain about a couple of long paragraphs. 

on top of that i have read things like 
STALIN AND MARXISM: A RESEARCH NOTE 
in journal Studies in East European Thought

that is journals and things most dont even know exist. 
&lt;i&gt;This article concerns the research done by the author in Stalin&#039;s private library. The notes made in the works of Marx, Engels and Lenin suggest that until the end of his life Stalin felt himself in general agreement with these &quot;classics.&quot; The choice of books and the notes support the thesis that, despite his historical interest and his identification with some of the tsars as powerful rulers, Stalin always continued to consider himself a Marxist, and that he was uninterested in other systems of thought, including those of traditional Russia.
&lt;/i&gt;

its on springerlink if you have access like i do.  

and this stuff isnt even my passion. 

this is reading i have done in passing!!! 

the patriots history of the united states is big

&lt;i&gt;For at least thirty years, high school and college students have been taught to be embarrassed by American history. Required readings have become skewed toward a relentless focus on our countryé‚’s darkest moments, from slavery to McCarthyism. As a result, many history books devote more space to Harriet Tubman than to Abraham Lincoln; more to My Lai than to the American Revolution; more to the internment of Japanese Americans than to the liberation of Europe in World War II.
Now, finally, there is an antidote to this biased approach to our history. Two veteran history professors have written a sweeping, well-researched book that puts the spotlight back on Americaé‚’s role as a beacon of liberty to the rest of the world. 

Schweikart and Allen are careful to tell their story straight, from Columbusé‚’s voyage to the capture of Saddam Hussein. They do not ignore Americaé‚’s mistakes through the years, but they put them back in their proper perspective. And they conclude that Americaé‚’s place as a world leader derived largely from the virtues of our own leadersé‚– the men and women who cleared the wilderness, abolished slavery, and rid the world of fascism and communism.

The authors write in a clear and enjoyable style that makes history a pleasure, not just for students but also for adults who want to learn what their teachers skipped over.

&lt;/i&gt;

its over 1000 pages. 


so i guess all these writiers, including war and peace, and big books like the three volumes of the musketeers...    the iliad...   all that are poor writing as they are waqy too long. 

(heck one of them is a poem!!!)



want to know why they are winning? 

because they read all this and know the deal
and you guys sit around pretending THEY are stupid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh.. i leave it to those who would folow the link and watch the whole show to know what the kid says!!! </p>
<p>its a bigger punchline that detriechs line as he comes out of the bathroom (i think. i havent seen it since the 70s&#8230; i can remember things to that detail)</p>
<p>now those that want to know ahve to watch 25 minute episode&#8230; </p>
<p>just like in the posts above, to get to one quote, you had to read the 1300 pages of ONE history book and put up references to mroe than six, and was lambasted that i couldnt reduce 6 history books which each on average over 5 times the size of a entertainment book into 200 words. </p>
<p>Das Kapitol is FOUR volumes long&#8230;</p>
<p>there are nine volumes to gramsci prison notebooks&#8230;  (vol 3 is 700 pages)</p>
<p>you guys have been taught to a 5th grade level</p>
<p>these guys wrote when 13th grade level was common and such writings were common in books for the young (like james fenimore coopers leatherstocking)</p>
<p>asking me to summarize them with references is basically asking me to make marx and all that stuff accessible to a 5th grader. </p>
<p> lei feng had a little red book, but his other writings could be used in battle. </p>
<p>want to read lenins collected works? (as i have)<br />
here is VOLUME 38<br />
Lenin &#8211; Philosophical Notebooks, Volume 38 of the Collected Works<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/4025775/Lenin-Philosophical-Notebooks-Volume-38-of-the-Collected-Works" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.scribd.com/doc/4025775/Lenin-Philosophical-Notebooks-Volume-38-of-the-Collected-Works</a></p>
<p>660 pages for vol 38&#8230;  </p>
<p>mein kampf 694 pages</p>
<p>All of these would be required reading before being able to start debating the subject seriously. </p>
<p>if you havent read them already in your life, then your not going to read them when i say to, as you have more than 40,000 pages just to get through lenin and then start on stalin. </p>
<p>40,000 pages and you complain about a couple of long paragraphs. </p>
<p>on top of that i have read things like<br />
STALIN AND MARXISM: A RESEARCH NOTE<br />
in journal Studies in East European Thought</p>
<p>that is journals and things most dont even know exist.<br />
<i>This article concerns the research done by the author in Stalin&#8217;s private library. The notes made in the works of Marx, Engels and Lenin suggest that until the end of his life Stalin felt himself in general agreement with these &#8220;classics.&#8221; The choice of books and the notes support the thesis that, despite his historical interest and his identification with some of the tsars as powerful rulers, Stalin always continued to consider himself a Marxist, and that he was uninterested in other systems of thought, including those of traditional Russia.<br />
</i></p>
<p>its on springerlink if you have access like i do.  </p>
<p>and this stuff isnt even my passion. </p>
<p>this is reading i have done in passing!!! </p>
<p>the patriots history of the united states is big</p>
<p><i>For at least thirty years, high school and college students have been taught to be embarrassed by American history. Required readings have become skewed toward a relentless focus on our countryé‚’s darkest moments, from slavery to McCarthyism. As a result, many history books devote more space to Harriet Tubman than to Abraham Lincoln; more to My Lai than to the American Revolution; more to the internment of Japanese Americans than to the liberation of Europe in World War II.<br />
Now, finally, there is an antidote to this biased approach to our history. Two veteran history professors have written a sweeping, well-researched book that puts the spotlight back on Americaé‚’s role as a beacon of liberty to the rest of the world. </p>
<p>Schweikart and Allen are careful to tell their story straight, from Columbusé‚’s voyage to the capture of Saddam Hussein. They do not ignore Americaé‚’s mistakes through the years, but they put them back in their proper perspective. And they conclude that Americaé‚’s place as a world leader derived largely from the virtues of our own leadersé‚– the men and women who cleared the wilderness, abolished slavery, and rid the world of fascism and communism.</p>
<p>The authors write in a clear and enjoyable style that makes history a pleasure, not just for students but also for adults who want to learn what their teachers skipped over.</p>
<p></i></p>
<p>its over 1000 pages. </p>
<p>so i guess all these writiers, including war and peace, and big books like the three volumes of the musketeers&#8230;    the iliad&#8230;   all that are poor writing as they are waqy too long. </p>
<p>(heck one of them is a poem!!!)</p>
<p>want to know why they are winning? </p>
<p>because they read all this and know the deal<br />
and you guys sit around pretending THEY are stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[brevity is good writing when your writing to ENTERTAIN. 

ever notice that magazine articles are short, and short histories over 1000 pages easy. 

would you like your doctor to have this idea of good writing and to have learned from a medical book that cut down all the meat and salient stuff to just the 200 words and that he could skip over the parts he doesnt like? 

so there are different purposes to writing. 
not one purpose. 

if you want to be entertained by history, then skip me and read hux or go to huffingon post, or get a copy of Zinn. 

but i thought the point here was not to entertain but to take our lives seriously. to actually KNOW what was going on!!!   that we thougth what was going on was serious enough to be taken seriously.  

my mistake. 

Didnt know it was a clutch of who cant see past their own desires and then realize that the point to the world is not to be pleasured and entertained by others who want to be pleasured and entertained. 

funny how people can sit and complain of the very behavior that they exhibit. 

want to know why there are studs in kids faces, and tramp stamps, fecundity down, crap on tv and such? 

when ya abused the smart people
(coming out of an era celebrating them)

you gave them mental bang ups
and the left capitailzed on it
and gave them a home
in exchange for enslaving you!!!

i dont get off on shadenfreude
so thats not my thing, but you would be 
very surprised how many at the top levels
harbor deep seated childish things like that. 

Barney Miller - Atomic Bomb

&lt;i&gt;The main character was Capt. Barney Miller, and there was an accompanying cast of characters that dealt with events and people in their own unique ways. My favorite was Detective Sgt. Arthur Dietrich (Steve Landesberg). He was the serious intellectual with a very dry sense of humor that came out at just the right moment.&lt;/i&gt;

remember that character?
A person who could do much more by your standards all, and instead was a cop. 

that is, he didnt want the accolades, and rewards that kept the nihilist hedonists going, he worked for his own rewards!!! 

you know... like america used to promise
[and which is impossible if you guys pound the tall poppies down, and attack the bent nails]

by the way. the abuse of the public heaped upon the fringe is what motivates the fringe to think that a totalitarian state with all under crap is better than a free state where people similar to many here, make their lives crap!!!   at least in the new world, they arent the only ones getting crapped on. 

&lt;i&gt;One episode has always stuck out in my memory where a college student claims to have built a working model of a thermonuclear bomb as part of his Master&#039;s thesis project. All it lacks, per him, is plutonium. 

&lt;b&gt;The bomb squad expert ridiculed the idea of it being any kind of bomb - his decades of experience on the force being his guide. 

All the guys in the office have just finished dismissing the notion, when Dietrich walks in, takes a look at the contraption, and casually asks, &quot;Where did you get the atom bomb?&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

www.hulu.com/embed/ODhUC26MBOFXqY-0rAdSSw

[for accuracies sake, no plutonium in an atom bomb, so the writer didnt know enough about bombs to get the story he loves straight]

you guys will do as well with it as the bomb squad did...   after all, they knew all there was to know about bombs and such...  

however it wasnt how much they knew

it was waht they didnt know

and in this situation, i am not worried about not knowing...  i know my history in the big wordy very detailed way..  sciences and other things too, so i also have tools for devining validity as well. 

enjoy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brevity is good writing when your writing to ENTERTAIN. </p>
<p>ever notice that magazine articles are short, and short histories over 1000 pages easy. </p>
<p>would you like your doctor to have this idea of good writing and to have learned from a medical book that cut down all the meat and salient stuff to just the 200 words and that he could skip over the parts he doesnt like? </p>
<p>so there are different purposes to writing.<br />
not one purpose. </p>
<p>if you want to be entertained by history, then skip me and read hux or go to huffingon post, or get a copy of Zinn. </p>
<p>but i thought the point here was not to entertain but to take our lives seriously. to actually KNOW what was going on!!!   that we thougth what was going on was serious enough to be taken seriously.  </p>
<p>my mistake. </p>
<p>Didnt know it was a clutch of who cant see past their own desires and then realize that the point to the world is not to be pleasured and entertained by others who want to be pleasured and entertained. </p>
<p>funny how people can sit and complain of the very behavior that they exhibit. </p>
<p>want to know why there are studs in kids faces, and tramp stamps, fecundity down, crap on tv and such? </p>
<p>when ya abused the smart people<br />
(coming out of an era celebrating them)</p>
<p>you gave them mental bang ups<br />
and the left capitailzed on it<br />
and gave them a home<br />
in exchange for enslaving you!!!</p>
<p>i dont get off on shadenfreude<br />
so thats not my thing, but you would be<br />
very surprised how many at the top levels<br />
harbor deep seated childish things like that. </p>
<p>Barney Miller &#8211; Atomic Bomb</p>
<p><i>The main character was Capt. Barney Miller, and there was an accompanying cast of characters that dealt with events and people in their own unique ways. My favorite was Detective Sgt. Arthur Dietrich (Steve Landesberg). He was the serious intellectual with a very dry sense of humor that came out at just the right moment.</i></p>
<p>remember that character?<br />
A person who could do much more by your standards all, and instead was a cop. </p>
<p>that is, he didnt want the accolades, and rewards that kept the nihilist hedonists going, he worked for his own rewards!!! </p>
<p>you know&#8230; like america used to promise<br />
[and which is impossible if you guys pound the tall poppies down, and attack the bent nails]</p>
<p>by the way. the abuse of the public heaped upon the fringe is what motivates the fringe to think that a totalitarian state with all under crap is better than a free state where people similar to many here, make their lives crap!!!   at least in the new world, they arent the only ones getting crapped on. </p>
<p><i>One episode has always stuck out in my memory where a college student claims to have built a working model of a thermonuclear bomb as part of his Master&#8217;s thesis project. All it lacks, per him, is plutonium. </p>
<p><b>The bomb squad expert ridiculed the idea of it being any kind of bomb &#8211; his decades of experience on the force being his guide. </p>
<p>All the guys in the office have just finished dismissing the notion, when Dietrich walks in, takes a look at the contraption, and casually asks, &#8220;Where did you get the atom bomb?&#8221;</b></i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hulu.com/embed/ODhUC26MBOFXqY-0rAdSSw" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.hulu.com/embed/ODhUC26MBOFXqY-0rAdSSw</a></p>
<p>[for accuracies sake, no plutonium in an atom bomb, so the writer didnt know enough about bombs to get the story he loves straight]</p>
<p>you guys will do as well with it as the bomb squad did&#8230;   after all, they knew all there was to know about bombs and such&#8230;  </p>
<p>however it wasnt how much they knew</p>
<p>it was waht they didnt know</p>
<p>and in this situation, i am not worried about not knowing&#8230;  i know my history in the big wordy very detailed way..  sciences and other things too, so i also have tools for devining validity as well. </p>
<p>enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144906</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have blogged.. and even had a large fan base
[who tend to follow me around a bit]

i was published at mens news daily and still am if i want to write.  I was read by over 100k a day, and could write what i felt like.  

my phtography is in magazines aroun the world
so i have done that too. 

i went to bronx sciecne. so acheived that kind of thing before i was a teen.  even played lincoln center and carnegie hall before my cousin (he graduated top of his class at juliard). except that his concert was his and i was in an orchestra. 
(not bad for someone who is more than 50% deaf!)

so...  my interest is in teaching people to give them the tools to a better life. 

is it any wonder that i tend to not listen to the rubes in the class who by their actions would deny others an education? 

i have no desire to be another victor david hanson. 
i have already had fame years ago, and who cares?  i hang out with the famous and notable (last year got to speak with rushdie for a while, and despite his poor attitude, is still a better person to talk with than Hux)

i guess you guys can figure out how to get out of a trap designed by some of the smartest people in modern history paid to sit all day and think of how to trick you.  whats more, your going to do it from a position of complete ignorance and fantasy. 

so it should be a good show. 

=[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have blogged.. and even had a large fan base<br />
[who tend to follow me around a bit]</p>
<p>i was published at mens news daily and still am if i want to write.  I was read by over 100k a day, and could write what i felt like.  </p>
<p>my phtography is in magazines aroun the world<br />
so i have done that too. </p>
<p>i went to bronx sciecne. so acheived that kind of thing before i was a teen.  even played lincoln center and carnegie hall before my cousin (he graduated top of his class at juliard). except that his concert was his and i was in an orchestra.<br />
(not bad for someone who is more than 50% deaf!)</p>
<p>so&#8230;  my interest is in teaching people to give them the tools to a better life. </p>
<p>is it any wonder that i tend to not listen to the rubes in the class who by their actions would deny others an education? </p>
<p>i have no desire to be another victor david hanson.<br />
i have already had fame years ago, and who cares?  i hang out with the famous and notable (last year got to speak with rushdie for a while, and despite his poor attitude, is still a better person to talk with than Hux)</p>
<p>i guess you guys can figure out how to get out of a trap designed by some of the smartest people in modern history paid to sit all day and think of how to trick you.  whats more, your going to do it from a position of complete ignorance and fantasy. </p>
<p>so it should be a good show. </p>
<p>=[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JuliB		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144897</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JuliB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/02/08/krauthammer-on-obamas-internationalism/#comment-144897</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t see Guiliani getting the nod.  The pubbies have 2 groups of shock troops - gun owners and pro-life people.  G will alienate the pro-lifers - and the Rs remain the Stupid Party.  Call it single issue if you will, but I could never vote for someone pro-choice, nor could a lot of pro-lifers.  It&#039;s a non-negotiable.

I voted for Bush based on his pro-2A stance and because I thought that his SC choices would be good.  None of the other issues mattered to me -- but I disagreed with him on nearly every other point.  (NB - this was before I reverted to Catholicism.)  

Guns and Life are not &#039;social issues&#039; to me, nor to many others.  They are, IMO, the basis of our American society.  There are many *related* issues I would consider social issues, and I could live with disagreement on them.  One good thing about my perspective - when many conservatives were getting upset about Bush&#039;s policies, I remained calm since I wasn&#039;t overly surprised.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see Guiliani getting the nod.  The pubbies have 2 groups of shock troops &#8211; gun owners and pro-life people.  G will alienate the pro-lifers &#8211; and the Rs remain the Stupid Party.  Call it single issue if you will, but I could never vote for someone pro-choice, nor could a lot of pro-lifers.  It&#8217;s a non-negotiable.</p>
<p>I voted for Bush based on his pro-2A stance and because I thought that his SC choices would be good.  None of the other issues mattered to me &#8212; but I disagreed with him on nearly every other point.  (NB &#8211; this was before I reverted to Catholicism.)  </p>
<p>Guns and Life are not &#8216;social issues&#8217; to me, nor to many others.  They are, IMO, the basis of our American society.  There are many *related* issues I would consider social issues, and I could live with disagreement on them.  One good thing about my perspective &#8211; when many conservatives were getting upset about Bush&#8217;s policies, I remained calm since I wasn&#8217;t overly surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
