<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Krauthammer on Obama on terrorists	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139593</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obama Friends Ayers, Dohrn, and Evans Join Up on Behalf of Hamas

They&#039;ve all been in Egypt agitating on behalf of Hamas terrorists:

Top President Barack Obama funder Jodie Evans and her terrorist sympathizing group Code Pink have provoked a violent crisis in Egypt over an attempt to deliver &quot;humanitarian aid&quot; to Hamas-run Gaza to mark the one-year anniversary of Israel&#039;s response to repeated provocations by Hamas terrorists. Evans was joined in Cairo by Obama pals Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dorhn, both former terrorists with the Weather Underground.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama Friends Ayers, Dohrn, and Evans Join Up on Behalf of Hamas</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve all been in Egypt agitating on behalf of Hamas terrorists:</p>
<p>Top President Barack Obama funder Jodie Evans and her terrorist sympathizing group Code Pink have provoked a violent crisis in Egypt over an attempt to deliver &#8220;humanitarian aid&#8221; to Hamas-run Gaza to mark the one-year anniversary of Israel&#8217;s response to repeated provocations by Hamas terrorists. Evans was joined in Cairo by Obama pals Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dorhn, both former terrorists with the Weather Underground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gcotharn		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139470</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gcotharn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139470</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Tu Quoque &#038; Ad Hominem…Ad Nauseum&quot;

LOL

Ass Vill Id:

Similar to GWB&#039;s forthrightness re national security: GWB actually tried to keep his campaign promises.  In this area, as compared with most politicians, GWB was golden. I think GWB&#039;s unusual (for a politician) forthrightness - in both national security and in keeping campaign promises - was part of what lulled the nation into believing Barack would also be forthright.  The nation either forgot - during the GWB years - that the promises of most politicians are worthless, and that national security needs can easily (Clinton) take a back seat to political necessity; or, as with my son, who voted for the first time, some young voters have never learned what the promises of most politicians are worth.  GWB was unusually trustworthy. Ironically, that lulled the nation&#039;s voters to sleep.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tu Quoque &amp; Ad Hominem…Ad Nauseum&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL</p>
<p>Ass Vill Id:</p>
<p>Similar to GWB&#8217;s forthrightness re national security: GWB actually tried to keep his campaign promises.  In this area, as compared with most politicians, GWB was golden. I think GWB&#8217;s unusual (for a politician) forthrightness &#8211; in both national security and in keeping campaign promises &#8211; was part of what lulled the nation into believing Barack would also be forthright.  The nation either forgot &#8211; during the GWB years &#8211; that the promises of most politicians are worthless, and that national security needs can easily (Clinton) take a back seat to political necessity; or, as with my son, who voted for the first time, some young voters have never learned what the promises of most politicians are worth.  GWB was unusually trustworthy. Ironically, that lulled the nation&#8217;s voters to sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Assistant Village Idiot		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139459</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Assistant Village Idiot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[More seriously.

Your reference to Bush&#039;s previous credibility is an important point.  History will give a clearer verdict whether W made a right or wrong choice there.  But there was no sense that he was making the choice to try Reid in civil courts as a &lt;i&gt;purely&lt;/i&gt; political choice.

I do not have that confidence with Obama.  Results might vindicate the choice and it all work out just find.  But I can&#039;t shake the impression that the politics are the dominant part of all Obama&#039;s decisions.  He doesn&#039;t have enough credibility in the bank to draw on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More seriously.</p>
<p>Your reference to Bush&#8217;s previous credibility is an important point.  History will give a clearer verdict whether W made a right or wrong choice there.  But there was no sense that he was making the choice to try Reid in civil courts as a <i>purely</i> political choice.</p>
<p>I do not have that confidence with Obama.  Results might vindicate the choice and it all work out just find.  But I can&#8217;t shake the impression that the politics are the dominant part of all Obama&#8217;s decisions.  He doesn&#8217;t have enough credibility in the bank to draw on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Assistant Village Idiot		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Assistant Village Idiot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re going to try Harry Reid in civil court? O-KAY!!

Oops.  Sorry.  Never mind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re going to try Harry Reid in civil court? O-KAY!!</p>
<p>Oops.  Sorry.  Never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: expat		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139447</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[expat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Frontpage has a good interview with VDH. I especially liked the message he says we should be sending to potential jihadis.

http://frontpagemag.com/2009/12/31/obama%E2%80%99s-tortured-rendezvous-with-reality-by-jamie-glazov/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frontpage has a good interview with VDH. I especially liked the message he says we should be sending to potential jihadis.</p>
<p><a href="http://frontpagemag.com/2009/12/31/obama%E2%80%99s-tortured-rendezvous-with-reality-by-jamie-glazov/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://frontpagemag.com/2009/12/31/obama%E2%80%99s-tortured-rendezvous-with-reality-by-jamie-glazov/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NeoConScum		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139438</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoConScum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139438</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Several times recently the behavior and reactions of the Obamites simply leave me speechless and searching--in vain--for descriptives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several times recently the behavior and reactions of the Obamites simply leave me speechless and searching&#8211;in vain&#8211;for descriptives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Sullivan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139434</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[gcotharn cited this:

&quot;... ordered staff to begin researching similar breakdowns – if any – from the Bush Administration.&quot;

Does that mean there might be a new cabinet department in the future?

The Department of Scapegoating?

The Department of Reverse Responsibilty?

The Department of Patsies, Pawns and Finks ?

I can see their latin motto now:

Tu Quoque &#038; Ad Hominem...Ad Nauseum]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gcotharn cited this:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; ordered staff to begin researching similar breakdowns – if any – from the Bush Administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does that mean there might be a new cabinet department in the future?</p>
<p>The Department of Scapegoating?</p>
<p>The Department of Reverse Responsibilty?</p>
<p>The Department of Patsies, Pawns and Finks ?</p>
<p>I can see their latin motto now:</p>
<p>Tu Quoque &amp; Ad Hominem&#8230;Ad Nauseum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Perfected democrat		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perfected democrat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;... Reid seemed like small potatoes then...&quot;

Only by pure luck, imagine if he had been successful... It&#039;s one of the problems, and not a highly complex one at that, with the Democrats that should be personal for every American; unfortunately most still don&#039;t think any further than their self-limited exposure to the MSM; or the recent Obamahellcare legislation wouldn&#039;t have been railroaded through.  Some people have learned a lot, but human civilization on this planet isn&#039;t generally anymore sophisticated than 1933...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; Reid seemed like small potatoes then&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Only by pure luck, imagine if he had been successful&#8230; It&#8217;s one of the problems, and not a highly complex one at that, with the Democrats that should be personal for every American; unfortunately most still don&#8217;t think any further than their self-limited exposure to the MSM; or the recent Obamahellcare legislation wouldn&#8217;t have been railroaded through.  Some people have learned a lot, but human civilization on this planet isn&#8217;t generally anymore sophisticated than 1933&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obama supporters can turn on a dime- I thought everything Bush did was horrible? How can it be cited as an example of good policy? It&#039;s almost as if their only arguments are ad hominem (&quot;Hypocrisy!&quot;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama supporters can turn on a dime- I thought everything Bush did was horrible? How can it be cited as an example of good policy? It&#8217;s almost as if their only arguments are ad hominem (&#8220;Hypocrisy!&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139402</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2010/01/02/krauthammer-on-obama-on-terrorists/#comment-139402</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[gcotharn: Hmm...sounds like the Shoe Bomber talking point in defense of Obama&#039;s inept handling of the Christmas Bomber came straight from the White House.

In any event, I&#039;m sure tired of all the &quot;What about Bush?&quot; responses to criticisms of Obama. 

Ever since he took office I notice that his supporters usually defend Obama on the basis of his high poll numbers (though not since the summer when his polls began tanking), blaming Bush, or ad hominems against the critics, but rarely on the merits of Obama himself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gcotharn: Hmm&#8230;sounds like the Shoe Bomber talking point in defense of Obama&#8217;s inept handling of the Christmas Bomber came straight from the White House.</p>
<p>In any event, I&#8217;m sure tired of all the &#8220;What about Bush?&#8221; responses to criticisms of Obama. </p>
<p>Ever since he took office I notice that his supporters usually defend Obama on the basis of his high poll numbers (though not since the summer when his polls began tanking), blaming Bush, or ad hominems against the critics, but rarely on the merits of Obama himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
