<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Noonan on Obama and Afghanistan	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Poole		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136688</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe that President Obama will resign the Office of the President of the United States in 2011.

He has a thin skin. He does not take setbacks with grace. He has experienced little adversity in his life and few, if any, emotional crises.

If the American people should elect enough Republicans to  take back the House and remove the power of the Democrats to override filibusters, then the power of the President will be greatly diminished.  

If the President is unable or unwilling to give up his agenda, then he will find himself marginalized.  Republicans would be happy to deadlock the Congress if they can&#039;t get enough Democrats to join in scuttling the programs of the far left of the Democratic party.

In such as situation, I believe that the President would rather resign the office than remain and face continual  humiliation from the Congress when they politely ignore his leadership.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that President Obama will resign the Office of the President of the United States in 2011.</p>
<p>He has a thin skin. He does not take setbacks with grace. He has experienced little adversity in his life and few, if any, emotional crises.</p>
<p>If the American people should elect enough Republicans to  take back the House and remove the power of the Democrats to override filibusters, then the power of the President will be greatly diminished.  </p>
<p>If the President is unable or unwilling to give up his agenda, then he will find himself marginalized.  Republicans would be happy to deadlock the Congress if they can&#8217;t get enough Democrats to join in scuttling the programs of the far left of the Democratic party.</p>
<p>In such as situation, I believe that the President would rather resign the office than remain and face continual  humiliation from the Congress when they politely ignore his leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Mc.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136342</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Mc.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136342</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Quoting Noonan: &quot;That said, it appears we&#039;re seeing some things we&#039;ve not seen before. The president of the United States gave a war speech, and the next day the nation didn&#039;t seem to rally around him. This is not the way it&#039;s gone in the past. Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, George W. Bush–when they addressed the nation about the wars they led, they received immediate support.&quot;

The nation did not rally around Obama on this because he is not a serious man. He is toying with our troops and our war capacities and our very nation so that he can consolidate more power. Everyone feels this in their guts and knows it in their heads. 

The nation will never rally around Obama on anything. He has evil in mind for America, and not good. This is a known fact by this time, and there is no evidence to refute it save &#039;words&#039;.

In short, since Obama is not an AMERICAN President, therefore Americans could not support him if they wanted to.

The only people who support him are the anti-American fellow citizens we live with. They hold all the reigns of power and are a major chunk of the population.

We are in a war. It is far more serious than the Afghan War (which is hugely serious). The war is FOR America. The war is IN America. America is currently losing that war, and losing badly. 

The war is for &#039;all the marbles&#039; as they say. It is not pretend so that there might be a do-over. Rather, it is do or die.

Until there is clarity on this issue, America has zero chance of winning. We will be defeated and &#039;America&#039; (that great beautiful, free and freeing and spirited and imaginative and prosperous thing) will end. It will be over and done, and the default position of peoples over 99% of history will recur - that is, Tyranny.

It is us or them. It has ever been thus. When I think of the good men of my father&#039;s generation, and all those great good men and women of eras past who fought and died for our freedom - and then to think we will lose it without a fight to a bully from Chicago and the likes of Pelosi, Emmanuel, and Reid, et al.....

That&#039;s a Hang Your Head in Shame moment for everyone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting Noonan: &#8220;That said, it appears we&#8217;re seeing some things we&#8217;ve not seen before. The president of the United States gave a war speech, and the next day the nation didn&#8217;t seem to rally around him. This is not the way it&#8217;s gone in the past. Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, George W. Bush–when they addressed the nation about the wars they led, they received immediate support.&#8221;</p>
<p>The nation did not rally around Obama on this because he is not a serious man. He is toying with our troops and our war capacities and our very nation so that he can consolidate more power. Everyone feels this in their guts and knows it in their heads. </p>
<p>The nation will never rally around Obama on anything. He has evil in mind for America, and not good. This is a known fact by this time, and there is no evidence to refute it save &#8216;words&#8217;.</p>
<p>In short, since Obama is not an AMERICAN President, therefore Americans could not support him if they wanted to.</p>
<p>The only people who support him are the anti-American fellow citizens we live with. They hold all the reigns of power and are a major chunk of the population.</p>
<p>We are in a war. It is far more serious than the Afghan War (which is hugely serious). The war is FOR America. The war is IN America. America is currently losing that war, and losing badly. </p>
<p>The war is for &#8216;all the marbles&#8217; as they say. It is not pretend so that there might be a do-over. Rather, it is do or die.</p>
<p>Until there is clarity on this issue, America has zero chance of winning. We will be defeated and &#8216;America&#8217; (that great beautiful, free and freeing and spirited and imaginative and prosperous thing) will end. It will be over and done, and the default position of peoples over 99% of history will recur &#8211; that is, Tyranny.</p>
<p>It is us or them. It has ever been thus. When I think of the good men of my father&#8217;s generation, and all those great good men and women of eras past who fought and died for our freedom &#8211; and then to think we will lose it without a fight to a bully from Chicago and the likes of Pelosi, Emmanuel, and Reid, et al&#8230;..</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a Hang Your Head in Shame moment for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: br549		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[br549]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know he&#039;s getting harped on a lot, but I still can&#039;t help but wonder if this blog is Mitsu&#039;s &quot;assignment&quot;.

I have read and read, but have yet to see him conclusively, hands down, win a point. You&#039;d think he&#039;d have some sort of complex ny now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know he&#8217;s getting harped on a lot, but I still can&#8217;t help but wonder if this blog is Mitsu&#8217;s &#8220;assignment&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have read and read, but have yet to see him conclusively, hands down, win a point. You&#8217;d think he&#8217;d have some sort of complex ny now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Oblio		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oblio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m afraid that Mitsu is stuck in a time warp where it is always October 2008 and the &lt;i&gt;bien pensant&lt;/i&gt; can project any kind of fantasy on the Sphinx of Hyde Park.  In his own mind, I&#039;m sure he believes that he means well; but his separation from reality is almost complete.  What is about to happen will leave him stunned and disoriented.  Poor fellow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid that Mitsu is stuck in a time warp where it is always October 2008 and the <i>bien pensant</i> can project any kind of fantasy on the Sphinx of Hyde Park.  In his own mind, I&#8217;m sure he believes that he means well; but his separation from reality is almost complete.  What is about to happen will leave him stunned and disoriented.  Poor fellow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baklava		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136292</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baklava]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136292</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Mitsu,

When you come back in 2 - 3 months, I can predict that you will say that you haven&#039;t read posts by Neo and CAN&#039;T understand where we come from

You will be negligent and will once again FAIL to read links and see that the sources you are reading are WRONG.

See?

We read your sources. We know what they say. FOr once read the stuff we submit to you.

But - at least I&#039;m on record here and I can point to this post for you when you come back without doing due diligence.

What a failure you are.

Baklava]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mitsu,</p>
<p>When you come back in 2 &#8211; 3 months, I can predict that you will say that you haven&#8217;t read posts by Neo and CAN&#8217;T understand where we come from</p>
<p>You will be negligent and will once again FAIL to read links and see that the sources you are reading are WRONG.</p>
<p>See?</p>
<p>We read your sources. We know what they say. FOr once read the stuff we submit to you.</p>
<p>But &#8211; at least I&#8217;m on record here and I can point to this post for you when you come back without doing due diligence.</p>
<p>What a failure you are.</p>
<p>Baklava</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sweetpea		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136290</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sweetpea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Neo,

Noonan is a RINO or a thinker in name only and needs to be allowed to fade out like the NYT.  They need to be disdained.

Thank you for blogging and pondering.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Neo,</p>
<p>Noonan is a RINO or a thinker in name only and needs to be allowed to fade out like the NYT.  They need to be disdained.</p>
<p>Thank you for blogging and pondering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: will		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136223</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the clarification Neo!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification Neo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: G6loq		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G6loq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with you Neoneocon, factcheck is correct here. I looked up the siding with Islam mahself in the book.

Fun to check on the checkers though ... amusing what you find.

Cheers!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Neoneocon, factcheck is correct here. I looked up the siding with Islam mahself in the book.</p>
<p>Fun to check on the checkers though &#8230; amusing what you find.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: betsybounds		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[betsybounds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well if she has any sense she reads you.

I don&#039;t know.  There&#039;s this pattern of, &quot;Obama speaks, Noonan goes gooey and rambles.&quot;  He nearly always disarms her.  She might have a couple of gentle suggestions.  But mainly she feels--not thinks--that no one could have, or ever has, said anything very different.  Not even to soldiers, not even to warriors. A little heavy on the &quot;I&quot; content, is all.  

And, as ever, the message from Our Lady is:  Be nice.  Remember to be nice.  (HT: Garrison Keillor.)

Maybe she&#039;s applying for a gig.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if she has any sense she reads you.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know.  There&#8217;s this pattern of, &#8220;Obama speaks, Noonan goes gooey and rambles.&#8221;  He nearly always disarms her.  She might have a couple of gentle suggestions.  But mainly she feels&#8211;not thinks&#8211;that no one could have, or ever has, said anything very different.  Not even to soldiers, not even to warriors. A little heavy on the &#8220;I&#8221; content, is all.  </p>
<p>And, as ever, the message from Our Lady is:  Be nice.  Remember to be nice.  (HT: Garrison Keillor.)</p>
<p>Maybe she&#8217;s applying for a gig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/12/04/noonan-on-obama-and-afghanistan/#comment-136190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know about Fact Check, G6loq, but in this case I think their facts are correct.  Those quotes are either in the book or they&#039;re not.  If you can find a reputable source that says they are, give us a link.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know about Fact Check, G6loq, but in this case I think their facts are correct.  Those quotes are either in the book or they&#8217;re not.  If you can find a reputable source that says they are, give us a link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
