<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mona Charen on Obama&#8217;s narcissism	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: betsybounds		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126988</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[betsybounds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126988</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Artfldgr:

I&#039;m with Tom, here.  Don&#039;t be discouraged.  I get a lot of value from reading your posts.  Although I don&#039;t find much in the way of comfort, still I tend to share your views.  I hope we&#039;re wrong, but no one has persuaded me of that so far.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artfldgr:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Tom, here.  Don&#8217;t be discouraged.  I get a lot of value from reading your posts.  Although I don&#8217;t find much in the way of comfort, still I tend to share your views.  I hope we&#8217;re wrong, but no one has persuaded me of that so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Artfldgr:
Relax, man. Keep your eye on the Obonga ball. We are with you! You are among friends here. United we stand, and all that. I get your posts, though the typos generated by your hurry do put some rocks on my path.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artfldgr:<br />
Relax, man. Keep your eye on the Obonga ball. We are with you! You are among friends here. United we stand, and all that. I get your posts, though the typos generated by your hurry do put some rocks on my path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew M		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126972</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When I heard an audio clip of the school children singing the songs about Obama, it dawned on me that what some people who were so disgusted with Bush were anxious for was a fuhrer.  (BTW, WTF was the &quot;mmm mmm mmm&quot; chorus?  Was the song about a person or food?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I heard an audio clip of the school children singing the songs about Obama, it dawned on me that what some people who were so disgusted with Bush were anxious for was a fuhrer.  (BTW, WTF was the &#8220;mmm mmm mmm&#8221; chorus?  Was the song about a person or food?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: E		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126964</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Neo wrote:

&quot;E: Oh, he’s doing things that are very useful.

The question is: useful to whom?&quot;

Oh, I know, I know. Maybe Victor Davis Hanson was right when he wrote that Obama is acting more like a university president than anything else. It explains the worthless speechifying, which is noteable only for the inverse ratio between its high ideals and its  practical content.

I have never been a conspiracy theorist.  I&#039;m completely unmoved by the birth certificate kerfuffle. But I will say this: if Barack Obama had been a Marxist mole, deeply planted by some nefarious outfit to be activated at the perfect, opportune moment to enact a program designed to bring about the end of our way of life, how would he behave any differently?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neo wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;E: Oh, he’s doing things that are very useful.</p>
<p>The question is: useful to whom?&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, I know, I know. Maybe Victor Davis Hanson was right when he wrote that Obama is acting more like a university president than anything else. It explains the worthless speechifying, which is noteable only for the inverse ratio between its high ideals and its  practical content.</p>
<p>I have never been a conspiracy theorist.  I&#8217;m completely unmoved by the birth certificate kerfuffle. But I will say this: if Barack Obama had been a Marxist mole, deeply planted by some nefarious outfit to be activated at the perfect, opportune moment to enact a program designed to bring about the end of our way of life, how would he behave any differently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gringo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gringo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Huxley: Bryan won his first nomination largely on his oratorical skills, as shown in his &quot;Cross of Gold&quot; speech. Bryan did not operate with a teleprompter. 

One other comparison: Harding was rumored to be of mixed blood.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huxley: Bryan won his first nomination largely on his oratorical skills, as shown in his &#8220;Cross of Gold&#8221; speech. Bryan did not operate with a teleprompter. </p>
<p>One other comparison: Harding was rumored to be of mixed blood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126956</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gringo: I give Harding the nod over Obama because Harding served as Lt Gov of Ohio for two years and completed six years in the US Senate.

IMO one has to go back to the William Jennings Bryan, the populist, progressive nitwit, who received the Democratic presidential nomination in 1896 with only four years experience in the US House of Representatives.

But sure, Obama, Harding, and Bryan -- all fine dangerously inexperienced hacks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gringo: I give Harding the nod over Obama because Harding served as Lt Gov of Ohio for two years and completed six years in the US Senate.</p>
<p>IMO one has to go back to the William Jennings Bryan, the populist, progressive nitwit, who received the Democratic presidential nomination in 1896 with only four years experience in the US House of Representatives.</p>
<p>But sure, Obama, Harding, and Bryan &#8212; all fine dangerously inexperienced hacks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JuneauDraig		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126952</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JuneauDraig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve also been wondering if Obama shouldn&#039;t have been running for UN Secretary General. His campaign speech in Germany last year strongly reinforces that consideration.

I have to admit serious trepidation, though, were he ever to attain that seemingly feckless post. With his buddy-buddy overtures to the likes of Ahmedinajad, Chavez, Castro, and Zelaya--tempered with his obvious anti-Americanism--what coalitions could he build for his &quot;New World Order&quot; that would put teeth (or should I say fangs) back into the UN?

I would be afraid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also been wondering if Obama shouldn&#8217;t have been running for UN Secretary General. His campaign speech in Germany last year strongly reinforces that consideration.</p>
<p>I have to admit serious trepidation, though, were he ever to attain that seemingly feckless post. With his buddy-buddy overtures to the likes of Ahmedinajad, Chavez, Castro, and Zelaya&#8211;tempered with his obvious anti-Americanism&#8211;what coalitions could he build for his &#8220;New World Order&#8221; that would put teeth (or should I say fangs) back into the UN?</p>
<p>I would be afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[oh. and to put in other terms what you did. 

you used collectivst tactics to ridicule me to bring me back in line with how you want the group to be. you want them to follow your reasoning, and you dont want them to listen to me at all.  that way, your status remains. 

however, if they do read the stuff i put up from the past...  they will learn facts you dont like. facts that make your points not so clear any more. facts that makes the one PRETENDING to be reasonable, someone not to listen to as they dont have all the facts, and they trhow them out, and they do so to control the message others get. 

if you werent doing this, and you didnt internalize these methods, then you would rationally talk about these prior texts. 

but you havent read them. and thats a problem to maintaining your status as a man whose reasonableness comes from logic and reason. 

but logic and reason with holes in it like swiss cheese, that does not address all of whats there. is not logic and reason, its just another form of propaganda where you control the message and what people think. 

i want them tocome to their own concljusions based on ALL of the facts. 

you have remarkably internalixed the methodology where the ignorant can appear smarter than the smart and knowlegeable, as long as they have an ignorant audience. 

once that is the situiation, the last thing anyone in a good place needs there is real facts!!! 

no differnt than the 50 or so years missing from the DNC history covering the hayes elections.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh. and to put in other terms what you did. </p>
<p>you used collectivst tactics to ridicule me to bring me back in line with how you want the group to be. you want them to follow your reasoning, and you dont want them to listen to me at all.  that way, your status remains. </p>
<p>however, if they do read the stuff i put up from the past&#8230;  they will learn facts you dont like. facts that make your points not so clear any more. facts that makes the one PRETENDING to be reasonable, someone not to listen to as they dont have all the facts, and they trhow them out, and they do so to control the message others get. </p>
<p>if you werent doing this, and you didnt internalize these methods, then you would rationally talk about these prior texts. </p>
<p>but you havent read them. and thats a problem to maintaining your status as a man whose reasonableness comes from logic and reason. </p>
<p>but logic and reason with holes in it like swiss cheese, that does not address all of whats there. is not logic and reason, its just another form of propaganda where you control the message and what people think. </p>
<p>i want them tocome to their own concljusions based on ALL of the facts. </p>
<p>you have remarkably internalixed the methodology where the ignorant can appear smarter than the smart and knowlegeable, as long as they have an ignorant audience. </p>
<p>once that is the situiation, the last thing anyone in a good place needs there is real facts!!! </p>
<p>no differnt than the 50 or so years missing from the DNC history covering the hayes elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gringo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126950</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gringo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Huxley:
&lt;i&gt;I believe Obama is on his way to the worst presidency since Warren Harding.&lt;/i&gt;

Before the election, I constructed an experience metric of US Senators who became President. Here was Obama&#039;s experience applied to the metric: US Senate experience,  no House of Representative experience, no Vice President experience,  no Cabinet experience, no military experience, no experience as Governor.

There was only one other President who fit Obama&#039;s experience metric. That would be President Warren Harding.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huxley:<br />
<i>I believe Obama is on his way to the worst presidency since Warren Harding.</i></p>
<p>Before the election, I constructed an experience metric of US Senators who became President. Here was Obama&#8217;s experience applied to the metric: US Senate experience,  no House of Representative experience, no Vice President experience,  no Cabinet experience, no military experience, no experience as Governor.</p>
<p>There was only one other President who fit Obama&#8217;s experience metric. That would be President Warren Harding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126949</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/09/25/mona-charen-on-obamas-narcissism/#comment-126949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obama&#039;s links to Russian ideololgy 

this is just off the cuff. 
please give me the list of associations to cthulu...

1. parents met learning russian
2. uncle was key to overthrow kenya free state and created a communist one with assistance from russia
3. daughter has a russian name, sascha. its alexander, after alexander pushkin. the man whom russians say embodies them. 
4. other daughter is named malia, after an american author who biographied pushkin
5. likes to redistribute wealth
6. loves unions 
7. hates our allies
8. loves our communist enemies
9. has run up the budget to more than all other budgets before them combined. 
10. has printed money to more than 3 times the money in print before he came to office. that is our monetary supply has increased more than 400 percent in 2 years. wait till that hits
11. has favored russia by unilateral disarmament
12. has favored russia by trying to reset relations as if they have never had a pass
13. His biography (now admitted) was written by ayers a stalinist whose organization wanted the extermination of 25 million americans, planted bombs, killed people and commited bank robbery to fund the black socialists


so huxley, waht are obamas associations to cthulu? 

i guess its a shutout.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s links to Russian ideololgy </p>
<p>this is just off the cuff.<br />
please give me the list of associations to cthulu&#8230;</p>
<p>1. parents met learning russian<br />
2. uncle was key to overthrow kenya free state and created a communist one with assistance from russia<br />
3. daughter has a russian name, sascha. its alexander, after alexander pushkin. the man whom russians say embodies them.<br />
4. other daughter is named malia, after an american author who biographied pushkin<br />
5. likes to redistribute wealth<br />
6. loves unions<br />
7. hates our allies<br />
8. loves our communist enemies<br />
9. has run up the budget to more than all other budgets before them combined.<br />
10. has printed money to more than 3 times the money in print before he came to office. that is our monetary supply has increased more than 400 percent in 2 years. wait till that hits<br />
11. has favored russia by unilateral disarmament<br />
12. has favored russia by trying to reset relations as if they have never had a pass<br />
13. His biography (now admitted) was written by ayers a stalinist whose organization wanted the extermination of 25 million americans, planted bombs, killed people and commited bank robbery to fund the black socialists</p>
<p>so huxley, waht are obamas associations to cthulu? </p>
<p>i guess its a shutout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
